Plenty of challenges continue to face successful providers of hosted or premises-based VoIP services. In its most recent survey of IP communications demand in the small and medium business market, Savatar Research found some “good and bad news and some that is disturbing,” says John Macario, Savatar president.
“We were expecting a bump in the market, based on the last three years of work, or at least a growth rate consistent with the past,” he says. “The bad news is that adoption is flat.” There’s not a lot of growth, he says. SME adoption is stalled at about 17 percent.
“There’s increasing frustration among SMEs,” who apparently haven’t yet gotten the message about benefits, which are clear enough based on feedback from executives who have purchased and use IP communications products and services.
It isn’t that SMEs are buying legacy phone systems. They just are not moving. They’re “just sitting on what they’ve got.” And that’s true both for premises phone systems and hosted offerings, Macario says.
All of which suggests many service providers who don’t know how to serve the market, he notes.
Macario says there is some evidence that buying might even have slowed over the last year. For those who have purchased IP communications products or services, “more than 70 percent purchased more than one year ago,” Macario says. “Only 12 percent have purchased between six months to a year ago.”
“About 15 percent have bought last six months,” he says.
The good news is that “the buyers are insanely happy,” Macario notes. About three quarters of respondents say they have gotten economic benefit while 75 percent say the systems are much easier to manage.
About 84 percent say the quality of their IP systems is as good or better than their old systems. The same percentage say the IP systems are as good or more reliable than the old systems.
As you would expect, 82 percent say the IP feature set is far better. Astoundingly, 95 percent say they would recommend or highly recommend the service or system they now use.
They “really are enthusiastic,” Macario says. Among the most-used IP features is the auto attendant capability. For many SMEs, this is the first system that allows them to do so. Half of respondents say they use it. About a third use group-oriented features or informal call center capabilities as well.
About a third use find me/follow me or simultaneous ring, he adds. About a quarter use click-to-dial and the ability to integrate with Microsoft Office applications. “People are starting to explore the feature set and figure out what else they can do,” says Macario.
But it is wireless services of various types that seem to be top of mind and growing in importance. Wireless related services also seem to have huge potential for inducing churn.
Of those who have deployed some sort of IP communications capability, about 71 percent are very or somewhat interested in FMC as a desktop replacement service, if the pricing is acceptable. About 83 percent would be interested in using it as an add-on or replacement for at least some desk devices.
Asked what else they would consider buying from the same vendor who sold the IP communications service or system, about 40 percent indicated wireless was on the list. About one third would buy Web collaboration tools like WebEx or Live Meeting services.
Demand seems to be just as high even for respondents who have not bought any IP communications service or capability. About 75 percent of those who haven’t yet bought are somewhat or very interested in fixed-mobile solutions.
Some 70 percent said somewhat or very likely to switch from their wireline service to an FMC offering and 70 percent said they would switch from their current mobile provider to get the capabilities.
About 71 percent of respondents who haven’t yet bought an IP solution would be interested in mobile desktop replacement as well.
Respondents say they would be willing to consider replacing at least some desktop phones if doing do saves about 20 percent from their total communications bill.
About 35 percent of respondents say they now pay for employee use of mobiles, picking up between 76 and 100 percent of the cost of the service.
Traditional telcos also are getting more traction and mindshare in the business VoIP space, it appears. For two years, traditional phone companies have got a really low share where it comes to SME executive perception about “who” provides business VoIP servicers, says Macario.
This year, telcos moved seven points higher. About 24 percent of respondents now view telcos as providers of business VoIP. Interestingly, 29 percent said cable companies come to mind as providers of business VoIP.
Non-traditional providers fare best at smaller firms. As firm size goes up, telcos do better. In the 50 to 99 employee segment, only 20 percent say non-traditional telcos are logical providers. And note: the cable gets 22 percent of the votes in that segment category.
That might be surprising for CLEC and other executives who think cable will not get traction in the SME space. “When a CLEC or a pureplay provider knocks at the door, they want to know who they are,” says Macario. “Cable has a brand. That helps.”
Cable already has surprising share at the lower end of the broadband access market. In the one-to-four-employees segment, “about half use cable modems,” says Macario.
“Once you get up to five to 19 employees, then 11 percent have T1s,” he notes. “DSL share is 47 percent, 25 percent T1 at slightly larger firms.”
Overall, says Macario, service providers, in a broad sense, aren’t doing a good job of communicating the benefit of making a switch to IP communications.
