AOL has the worse ranking among companies with "poor customer service," according to MSN Money's second annual Customer Service Hall of Shame, a ranking of companies with the worst customer service, based on a nationwide survey commissioned by MSN Money and conducted by Zogby International.
Comcast was said to have poor customer service by 42 percent of respondents. Sprint, Qwest, Time Warner CAble and Cox Communications also are on the list of "10 worst" performers.
. .
About 47 percent of people who had an opinion of AOL's customer service said it was "poor." MSN Money writer Karen Aho notes that communications companies and banks that provide complex and at times highly technical products are on the list precisely because those products are so complex.
Still, one has to note that AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile are not on the list. Without excusing poor performance, consumer customer service is a tough job, hard to do well. As someone who once worked for a system integrator, I can attest that questions sometimes came in that I wasn't sure who was responsible for handling.
I don't think I'd claim we ever did a great job of it. It's tough, dogged work.
In fact, it can be unpleasant work. My wife occasionally gets calls from angry consumers who have a right to be angry, and all she can do is direct them to a department that probably was responsible for the unresponsive behavior in the first place. She knows the service "sucks." But large organizations that really don't care tend not to fix those sorts of problems.
In fairness, all big companies struggle with customer service, for good reasons. It's hard to do well, especially when the average size of any single account isn't large enough to devote as much support as one probably should provide.
Still, one notes that some names did not appear on the list. As tough as it is, customer service is better at some companies than at others. As a personal aside, I'm not sure I can agree with poll respondents who say Qwest customer service is poor. That hasn't been my personal experience at all.
In fairness, though, my contact with Qwest is as a business customer, and business customers get better service.
For the survey, conducted online in March, Zogby asked more than 7,000 people across the country to rate their customer experiences with 140 leading companies in 14 industries, including airlines, hotels, insurance companies and big-box stores such as Wal-Mart. Respondents could answer "excellent," "good," "fair," "poor," "not familiar" or "not sure."
The companies in the Hall of Shame were ranked by the percentage of people familiar with a company who answered "poor."
Thursday, May 29, 2008
The Customer Service Hall of Shame
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Directv-Dish Merger Fails
Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
5 comments:
I will agree that a company not being on this list doesn't mean it doesn't rank but that number for Comcast is a little high. But not that surprising, either. My Cavalier service wasn't mentioned, for example, but I personally have had minor issues that were resolved within a business day. I would like to think they actually have good customer service and this is the real reason why. But this Comcast thing has gotten out of hand. I'm glad it's not just me anymore angrily barking in the dark.
I agree about Cavalier. From what I can tell, they do a pretty darn good job.
We are seeing that the poor customer service, whether it’s a video posted to YouTube about
a person, or a company is bad for the developing a business as the success of business is
totally dependent upon the customer satisfaction. Some of them simply seem so absurd and
unbelievable that they are funny unless you are on the receiving end or even the company
who ultimately may loose customers because of a poor experience. In stark contrast to the
companies at the top of the list who are giving much more satisfaction to the customer.
They understand the value of their customers and cater to them over shareholders.
Some of the companies on this list have had a bad reputation for service for years and it appears little progress is being made as evidenced by the fact that their names continue to show up on these kinds of lists. If they are taking steps to improve service it is going to be a long road to recovery. Thanks for sharing.
Post a Comment