Friday, December 10, 2010
IP Backbone Traffic: Volume Up 54%, Price-Per-Bit Down, 25% Per Year
The companies that run the world's IP backbone networks are used to two trends: Traffic grows every year and the price-per-gigabit declines every year. IP transit prices, one of the best ways to quantify the cost of using global backbone networks, have declined by 25 percent per year, on a cost-per-bit basis, in major hub cities since 2007.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Directv-Dish Merger Fails
Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
2 comments:
What are the bit-prices?
Price depends on which specific route. TeleGeography says median prices in the second quarter of 2010 were $10 per megabit per second, per month, in New York and London, but more than $50 per megabit per second, per month, in Sao Paulo. Hong Kong was maybe $30 per megabit per second of capacity, per month.
Those are median prices, so half were higher, half were lower.
Post a Comment