An analysis of consumer benefits or costs from usage-based telecom service pricing suggests that regulatory oversight may not improve well-being even in the presence of clear anti-competitive conduct by broadband providers, the Phoenix Center for for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy
Studies argues.
Oversight is something regulators and politicians like to say they are conducting. But it won't help, in terms of consumer benefits, the Phoenix Center analysis suggests.
In fact, such practices as charging over-the-top video service providers a fee to reach consumers, though considered an outrage by some policy advocates, actually helps end users.
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Usage-Based Pricing is Not "Anti-Consumer"

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most People Probably Pay Less for Home Broadband Than We Think
It always is difficult to ascertain what “most” consumers actually are paying for home broadband service, partly because people choose a ran...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment