Google has gotten so big — it booked $50 billion in annual revenue in 2012 — that it needs to find new markets in the billions of dollars to continue moving the sales needle. Small markets just won't do.
AT&T, Verizon, Cisco Systems and Comcast have the same problem. As big as they are, new markets and revenue streams smaller than $1 billion annually just aren't worth pursuing.
If you want to know why specialty providers often thrive in most big markets, that is the reason. There is a threshold below which it simply makes no sense for a large supplier to compete, and those markets are left for other suppliers.
Of course, there often comes a time when a former specialty market becomes so lucrative that the big fish have to jump in. Those are key transition points, as the former specialty players typically cannot compete, or simply are bought out.
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Google, Like AT&T or Comcast, Needs Big New Markets
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes, Follow the Data. Even if it Does Not Fit Your Agenda
When people argue we need to “follow the science” that should be true in all cases, not only in cases where the data fits one’s political pr...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment