Google has gotten so big — it booked $50 billion in annual revenue in 2012 — that it needs to find new markets in the billions of dollars to continue moving the sales needle. Small markets just won't do.
AT&T, Verizon, Cisco Systems and Comcast have the same problem. As big as they are, new markets and revenue streams smaller than $1 billion annually just aren't worth pursuing.
If you want to know why specialty providers often thrive in most big markets, that is the reason. There is a threshold below which it simply makes no sense for a large supplier to compete, and those markets are left for other suppliers.
Of course, there often comes a time when a former specialty market becomes so lucrative that the big fish have to jump in. Those are key transition points, as the former specialty players typically cannot compete, or simply are bought out.
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Google, Like AT&T or Comcast, Needs Big New Markets

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Outcomes, Not Intent, Will Drive Antitrust Against Meta, Alphabet
As U.S. regulators examine potential antitrust actions against Alphabet (Google) and Meta (Facebook) under the Clayton and Sherman Acts, the...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment