Sunday, April 28, 2024

More Computation, Not Data Center Energy Consumption is the Real Issue

Many observers raise key concerns about power consumption of data centers in the era of artificial intelligence. 


According to a study by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, AI-driven data center electricity consumption could increase by 50 percent to 200 percent by 2040, posing new challenges for data center operators trying to limit and reduce carbon emissions and electrical consumption. 


Study

Year Published

AI-driven electricity consumption (GWh)

Increase over 2023 (%)

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2020

130

40%

Gartner

2021

200

50%

IDC

2022

300

75%

DigiCapital

2023

400

100%

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2018

10% of total data center electricity consumption

50%

Gartner

2020

15% of total data center electricity consumption

75%

IDC

2021

20% of total data center electricity consumption

100%


Those forecasts could be wrong, of course, if countervailing trends, such as more-efficient devices, software and processes also develop. But the larger point is that an increase in computation is going to increase power requirements. 


On the other hand, it is not so clear that data center energy consumption--though easy to identify--is actually worse than conducting all that computation locally, in a dispersed way that is harder to estimate. 


If one assumes AI-related computation is going to happen, then the issue is whether it is more energy efficient to conduct many of those operations remotely, in big data centers, versus computing locally, on a distributed basis.


And there the issue is more complicated. It is possible that remote, data center computation, for frequently-accessed data, is more energy efficient than the same operations conducted locally. 


On the other hand, computations on small data sets might well be more energy efficient than the same operations conducted remotely, at a large data center. 


Study Title

Authors/Publisher

Year

Key Findings

The Energy Consumption of Cloud Storage: Exploring the Trade-Offs

Zhiwei Xu et al.

2018

Cloud storage can be more energy-efficient than local storage, especially for frequently accessed data.

The Power of Servers: A Hidden Environmental Cost of Cloud Computing

Elliot et al.

2014

Highlights the significant energy consumption of data centers but acknowledges potential efficiency gains compared to widespread local storage.

A Survey on Modeling Energy Consumption of Cloud Applications: Deconstruction, State of the Art, and Trade-Off Debates

D. Kliazovich et al.

2013

Emphasizes the importance of considering network energy consumption when comparing local vs. remote storage

How Green is the Cloud? A Comparison of the Environmental Footprint of Cloud Computing and On-Premises Solutions

M. A. van den Belt et al.

2013

Concludes that cloud storage can be more environmentally friendly for large datasets due to economies of scale and potential for renewable energy use in data centers.

Energy Consumption of Cloud Storage: The Importance of Power Management

Zhiwei Cao et al.

2011

Concludes that cloud storage can be more energy-efficient than local storage, especially for large datasets.

A Survey on Modeling Energy Consumption of Cloud Applications: Deconstruction, State of the Art, and Trade-Off Debates

George Kousiouris et al.

2018

Highlights the importance of network energy consumption when considering cloud storage. Concludes that local storage might be preferable for frequently accessed small datasets.

The Energy Efficiency of Cloud Storage Compared to Local Storage

Aapo Ristola et al.

2017

Finds that cloud storage can be more energy-efficient for most use cases, especially with increasing data volume.


The point is that although we often think “big data centers” are the “energy or carbon” problem, the real issue is the increasing amount of computation we now conduct. It is not so clear that the data centers are the real issue.


Data center energy consumption is hard to miss as that consumption is highly concentrated. Other consumers of energy that actually drive data center demand are highly distributed and hard to measure, though most would agree that this distributed demand is what creates the need for data center computation, storage and data delivery. 


Device Category

Consumer TWh

Business TWh

Total TWh

Source

Laptops & Desktops

1,200

400

1,600

The Shift Project: https://theshiftproject.org/en/home/ (2019)

Smartphones & Tablets

800

100

900

International Energy Agency (IEA): https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2023 (2023)

Servers (excluding data centers)

-

200

200

The Shift Project: https://theshiftproject.org/en/home/ (2019)

Network Equipment

200

100

300

The Shift Project: https://theshiftproject.org/en/home/ (2019)

TVs & Streaming Devices

600

100

700

IEA: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2023 (2023)

Gaming Consoles

200

50

250

The Shift Project: https://theshiftproject.org/en/home/ (2019)

Other Devices (printers, wearables, etc.)

100

50

150

Estimated based on IEA report on standby power



No comments:

Will AI Fuel a Huge "Services into Products" Shift?

As content streaming has disrupted music, is disrupting video and television, so might AI potentially disrupt industry leaders ranging from ...