From a resource standpoint, it's more expensive. So why do it? People like it. That doesn't mean there is no revenue-related reason to do it. To the extent that it glues users to Google for search, it is worth it. If other revenue opportunities arise later, that's good. But right now, it might be more a cool feature than an immediate driver of revenue.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Google Instant is about User Experience, Not Revenue, At This Point
Jonathan Rosenberg , SVP Product Management at Google, says that “from a revenue standpoint impact, Google Instant has been minimal.”
Labels:
Google Instant

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft Capex is 3.5% of Global Total
In one sense, capital investment in data centers and artificial intelligence by Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft represents only about 3...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment