The meetings are part of talks aimed at finding a compromise on Internet regulation that would satisfy both the FCC's desire for preventing abuses (blocking or unfairly discriminating against legal content), and the industry's desire to retain ability to create new products that might well include enhanced quality of service features.
Many policy advocates have suggested must include a ban on network management techniques that give priority to any bits, at any time. Service providers have argued that would prevent them from creating new features and managing networks at times of peak demand.
Policy advocates have maintained that any prioritization is undesirable, keeping the Internet access business on a "best effort" basis. Service providers have argued that such prioritization, when not conducted for the purpose of discriminating against business competitors, is a typical traffic management process, and furthermore would preclude development of services end users might want, such as "video-optimized, gaming-optimized, voice-optimized or conferencing-optimized services."
In the past, such sharp disagreements typically have been resolved in ways that are not as far-reaching as policy advocates want, nor as benign as service providers might want, but which nevertheless are workable. There is little reason to doubt that such a compromise will fail to be reached this time as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment