Sometimes conventional wisdom can be quite wrong. Consider the notion that artificial intelligence will disproportionately disrupt jobs in some industries such as agriculture, hospitality and construction.
At least for the moment, these are some of the areas in which observers expect to see relatively lesser impact from wider use of AI, often in the form of robotic processes.
And at least for the present, the actual service provided by a human is preferable to that provided by a robot. In many other cases robots cannot cost effectively handle complicated or relatively non-routine use cases that humans can manage easily.
In fact, jobs such as data entry; transportation; customer service and manufacturing; for example, are considered more likely to be affected by applied AI.
Other jobs in agriculture; hospitality and construction are viewed as less disrupted by AI, often because the jobs hinge on either human dexterity and customization; fine motor skills, human interaction, empathy and personalized service.