The fact that AT&T has asked the Federal Communications for a definite date to shut down the public switched telephone network is, like most regulatory filings made in Washington, D.C., more complicated than it might appear.
Virtually all telecom service provider executives believe IP voice is the future, whether in the mobile or fixed domains. But the economics of the transition are complicated, at least for an incumbent provider.
Attackers, such as cable companies or independent VoIP providers, have no installed base of customers to cannibalize. Incumbents most certainly do, and that makes all the difference in perspective.
A Verizon executive recently noted that, “at this point in time, the business case does not support a technology-led migration off of the PSTN with the combination of land line loss, the economy, competing priorities and competitive dynamics.”
The key phrase is "technology led." Cable digital voice, Skype and Vonage build on VoIP: the technology directly supports the business case.
For an incumbent telecom provider, the technology in some cases harms the business case. To the extent that VoIP services largely replace an existing service with no incremental revenue, added investment is not met by added revenue. To the extent that VoIP services are priced lower than the voice services they replace, the business case is negative.
Under such circumstances it is rational to harvest PSTN voice as long as possible, despite market share losses. At some point, the logic reverses, however. As the fixed costs of the old PSTN are shared over a smaller base of customers, it will at some point be advantageous to switch to IP voice, strictly on the basis of operating cost savings.
That point has not yet been reached, but it is inevitable. The issue right now is what regulatory regime will apply to incumbents as that transition occurs. And one might argue that is the real point of the AT&T request for the FCC to specify a firm timetable for shutting down the PSTN.
The replacement of PSTN technology with IP telephony also creates an opportunity for new rules about carrier obligations that directly affect the costs of providing such service. That is why the AT&T request also argues that legacy rules must be altered as the transition is made.
Those rules are arcane and of little visible consequence for the typical consumer user of fixed voice. But they have enormous impact on the voice business case, as viewed from an incumbent perspective. Basically, all the rules that govern how networks compensate each other for terminating traffic are the heart of the matter.
So incumbent sunsetting of the PSTN will not be "technology led." The institutional and business frameworks remain the key issue.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Incumbent Telco VoIP Transition is Not Technology-Led
Labels:
broadband,
consumer VoIP,
regulation,
VoIP
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Friday, January 1, 2010
Broadband Stimulus Won't Change Much, Firm Says
Some observers seem to have believed the "broadband stimulus" program, as helpful as it will be for some organizations and service providers, would somehow "fix" a "broadband" adoption problem in the rural and some other "underserved" areas of the country. It appears reality is setting in.
"The bottom line is that the stimulus money is going to change any of the access issues," says Robert Rosenberg, Insight Research Corp. president. "It is far to few dollars to make any impact."
But "access" is only part of the "problem." In fact, Insight Research says, there are four different kinds of households that must be considered when looking at broadband "adoption" and "availability," which are quite different issues.
There are households "unable to buy" broadband service, at least from a terrestrial provider (most analysts seem to forget that there are two national providers of satellite broadband). There are households that can buy broadband, but choose to buy dial-up service.
There are households that do not own computers and households that own computers but do not use the Internet.
"I don't want to over-play the 'I can't buy it' issue, says Rosenberge. "Yes there is some of that, but it is also the issue of 'no computers' or 'dial up is fine for me,'" he says.
Insight says 60 million U.S. homes buy broadband access service, while 12.6 million homes buy dial-up access, for a total of 72.6 milliion Internet access buyers.
Insight Research says that if one adds up the households without any broadband service at all, plus dial-up households, perhaps 58 million households, or 49 percent of all U.S. households, potentially are candidates for broadband service and have not yet bought it.
Insight Research estimates that at least 12 million rural and non-urban market households do not have access to any broadband service (terrestrial) due to the lack of supporting terrestrial infrastructure. Given a minimum cost of $1,500 per household, it is easy to see that the price tag for expanding broadband access to 12 million new households could exceed $18 billion.
By definition, the funding available under the broadband stimulus program is just a bit over $7 billion, and that includes funding for middle-mile projects, computing centers and other projects that do not directly add new broadband access capability. In fact, only a theoretical $6.4 billion actually is available for infrastructure.
Insight Research projects that non-governmental funding will provide the majority of the
growth in broadband penetration for the next five years.
With an estimated 40 million households still lacking broadband access by year-end 2014, the $6.4
billion in government funding would allow for an investment of $164 per household to provide broadband access to these non-broadband households.
The availability of such a small investment amount per household casts serious doubt that any significant expansion of broadband access will result from this government action, Insight Research says.
At the current estimate of $1,500 per household, at least $60 billion would be needed to deploy universal broadband access across the United States for 40 million households.
The broadband stimulus will not change much, it appears.
"The bottom line is that the stimulus money is going to change any of the access issues," says Robert Rosenberg, Insight Research Corp. president. "It is far to few dollars to make any impact."
But "access" is only part of the "problem." In fact, Insight Research says, there are four different kinds of households that must be considered when looking at broadband "adoption" and "availability," which are quite different issues.
There are households "unable to buy" broadband service, at least from a terrestrial provider (most analysts seem to forget that there are two national providers of satellite broadband). There are households that can buy broadband, but choose to buy dial-up service.
There are households that do not own computers and households that own computers but do not use the Internet.
"I don't want to over-play the 'I can't buy it' issue, says Rosenberge. "Yes there is some of that, but it is also the issue of 'no computers' or 'dial up is fine for me,'" he says.
Insight says 60 million U.S. homes buy broadband access service, while 12.6 million homes buy dial-up access, for a total of 72.6 milliion Internet access buyers.
Insight Research says that if one adds up the households without any broadband service at all, plus dial-up households, perhaps 58 million households, or 49 percent of all U.S. households, potentially are candidates for broadband service and have not yet bought it.
Insight Research estimates that at least 12 million rural and non-urban market households do not have access to any broadband service (terrestrial) due to the lack of supporting terrestrial infrastructure. Given a minimum cost of $1,500 per household, it is easy to see that the price tag for expanding broadband access to 12 million new households could exceed $18 billion.
By definition, the funding available under the broadband stimulus program is just a bit over $7 billion, and that includes funding for middle-mile projects, computing centers and other projects that do not directly add new broadband access capability. In fact, only a theoretical $6.4 billion actually is available for infrastructure.
Insight Research projects that non-governmental funding will provide the majority of the
growth in broadband penetration for the next five years.
With an estimated 40 million households still lacking broadband access by year-end 2014, the $6.4
billion in government funding would allow for an investment of $164 per household to provide broadband access to these non-broadband households.
The availability of such a small investment amount per household casts serious doubt that any significant expansion of broadband access will result from this government action, Insight Research says.
At the current estimate of $1,500 per household, at least $60 billion would be needed to deploy universal broadband access across the United States for 40 million households.
The broadband stimulus will not change much, it appears.
Labels:
broadband,
broadband stimulus
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Amazon Sells More Kindle Books than Physical, On Christmas Day At Least
In a milestone of sorts, on Christmas day, Amazon sold more Kindle books than physical titles, the company says.
.
But Kindle content sales have a problem akin to YouTube's similar problem. The device and application are popular, and getting more traction. But the company loses money on new releases and makes only a modest amount on older titles, thus losing an estimated $1 per Kindle book sale.
The old adage about losing money on a sale, but making it up in volume does, in this case, have a logic to it. If Amazon can make its appliance and service popular enough, if it starts to drive huge volumes, then content owners will have more incentives to cut Amazon better deals on wholesale access to titles.
Over time, that should allow Amazon to improve its margins. So the big issue, long term, is whether much-lower wholesale prices will drive incremental sales volume high enough to create a big new business. Some observers speculate that at retail prices are cut to $2.99 or $3.99 per copy, sales volume should soar.
Smaller gross sale amounts, but much-higher volume, could create a more-attractive business case for Amazon and its partners.
.
But Kindle content sales have a problem akin to YouTube's similar problem. The device and application are popular, and getting more traction. But the company loses money on new releases and makes only a modest amount on older titles, thus losing an estimated $1 per Kindle book sale.
The old adage about losing money on a sale, but making it up in volume does, in this case, have a logic to it. If Amazon can make its appliance and service popular enough, if it starts to drive huge volumes, then content owners will have more incentives to cut Amazon better deals on wholesale access to titles.
Over time, that should allow Amazon to improve its margins. So the big issue, long term, is whether much-lower wholesale prices will drive incremental sales volume high enough to create a big new business. Some observers speculate that at retail prices are cut to $2.99 or $3.99 per copy, sales volume should soar.
Smaller gross sale amounts, but much-higher volume, could create a more-attractive business case for Amazon and its partners.
Labels:
Amazon,
ebook reader,
Kindle
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Small Businesses Challenged by Social Networking
As often is true in the communications business, tools that large enterprises find useful and helpful are not necesarily so helpful or useful for small businesses. Social networks likely fall into that category.
A survey of small business executives by Citibank, for example, found owners and managers giving short shrift to social networks as a help for their businesses.
The survey of 500 small business executives across the United States by Citibank / GfK Roper found 76 percent of respondents saying they have not found social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn to be helpful in generating business leads or for expanding their business during the last year, while 86 percent say they have not used social networking sites to get business advice or information.
The survey found that general search engine sites such as Google and Yahoo! trump small business-focused sites and the WSJ.com as destinations for small business owners to seek business advice or information. 61 percent of respondents say they rely on these search engine sites.
"Our survey suggests that small business owners are still feeling their way into social media, particularly when it comes to using these tools to grow their businesses," says Maria Veltre, Citibank EVP. "While social media can provide additional channels to network and help grow a business, many small businesses may not have the manpower or the time required take advantage of them."
That's a lesson even some mid-sized companies already have encountered. It isn't that social networking takes much capital or imposes much operating cost. What it does require is time. So the typical pattern is that a firm launches a social networking effort of some sort with time borrowed from executives and professionals who are very busy and scarcely have time to tackle the other issues on their agendas.
Over time the effort dwindles. That's one reason few small businesses have made sustained and vigorous social networking efforts.
One trend confirmed in other studies is that small businesses are making greater use of Web sites to support their business operations, marketing and sales.
About 42 percent of small business owners and managers reported that in the past year they have made greater use of their company's Web site to generate business leads and sales, though.
Among companies with 20 to 99 employees the percentage rises with 57 percent saying they have made greater use of their Web site.
Survey respondents are also using email marketing (28 percent) and online advertising (25 percent) to generate business leads and sales.
But the evidence on how well social networking works for lead generation is contradictory, so far.
A recent survey by Ad-ology found lead generation is the biggest benefit of social networking for U.S. small businesses, cited by one-half of respondents as being the case. Social networks were also considered a good way to keep up with the industry and monitor online chatter about the business.
Small businesses rated Facebook the most beneficial social networking site, with 33 percent of respondents reporting it was at least somewhat helpful. It was also the social network most likely to be used. Use of LinkedIn was less common, but the business-oriented site was claimed as beneficial by 21 percent of small businesses, compared with 19 percent that said the same of Twitter.
The biggest roadblock, however, was the perception that “our customers do not use social networks,” which 31 percent of respondents said they believed.
And as has been the case noted above, nearly 50 percent complained that they did not have the time or staff available to do a good job with social network marketing.
A survey of small business executives by Citibank, for example, found owners and managers giving short shrift to social networks as a help for their businesses.
The survey of 500 small business executives across the United States by Citibank / GfK Roper found 76 percent of respondents saying they have not found social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn to be helpful in generating business leads or for expanding their business during the last year, while 86 percent say they have not used social networking sites to get business advice or information.
The survey found that general search engine sites such as Google and Yahoo! trump small business-focused sites and the WSJ.com as destinations for small business owners to seek business advice or information. 61 percent of respondents say they rely on these search engine sites.
"Our survey suggests that small business owners are still feeling their way into social media, particularly when it comes to using these tools to grow their businesses," says Maria Veltre, Citibank EVP. "While social media can provide additional channels to network and help grow a business, many small businesses may not have the manpower or the time required take advantage of them."
That's a lesson even some mid-sized companies already have encountered. It isn't that social networking takes much capital or imposes much operating cost. What it does require is time. So the typical pattern is that a firm launches a social networking effort of some sort with time borrowed from executives and professionals who are very busy and scarcely have time to tackle the other issues on their agendas.
Over time the effort dwindles. That's one reason few small businesses have made sustained and vigorous social networking efforts.
One trend confirmed in other studies is that small businesses are making greater use of Web sites to support their business operations, marketing and sales.
About 42 percent of small business owners and managers reported that in the past year they have made greater use of their company's Web site to generate business leads and sales, though.
Among companies with 20 to 99 employees the percentage rises with 57 percent saying they have made greater use of their Web site.
Survey respondents are also using email marketing (28 percent) and online advertising (25 percent) to generate business leads and sales.
But the evidence on how well social networking works for lead generation is contradictory, so far.
A recent survey by Ad-ology found lead generation is the biggest benefit of social networking for U.S. small businesses, cited by one-half of respondents as being the case. Social networks were also considered a good way to keep up with the industry and monitor online chatter about the business.
Small businesses rated Facebook the most beneficial social networking site, with 33 percent of respondents reporting it was at least somewhat helpful. It was also the social network most likely to be used. Use of LinkedIn was less common, but the business-oriented site was claimed as beneficial by 21 percent of small businesses, compared with 19 percent that said the same of Twitter.
The biggest roadblock, however, was the perception that “our customers do not use social networks,” which 31 percent of respondents said they believed.
And as has been the case noted above, nearly 50 percent complained that they did not have the time or staff available to do a good job with social network marketing.
Labels:
marketing,
small business,
social networking
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Vonage World Mobile Launches
Users of the iPhone, BlackBerry and iPod touch can subscribe to Vonage World Mobile, a new global calling feature available for "Vonage Mobile," Vonage's mobile calling application. Vonage World Mobile provides customers with unlimited mobile international calls to over 60 countries for one flat monthly rate when calling from their mobile device.
The service works on cellular or Wi-Fi (iPhone), just Wi-Fi for the touch and only using mobile spectrum for the BlackBerry.
Current Vonage World residential customers will receive a 40 percent per month discount on their home service when they buy Vonage World Mobile.
Vonage World Mobile costs $24.99/month and is available as a free download at www.vonage.com and the iTunes App Store.
The service works on cellular or Wi-Fi (iPhone), just Wi-Fi for the touch and only using mobile spectrum for the BlackBerry.
Current Vonage World residential customers will receive a 40 percent per month discount on their home service when they buy Vonage World Mobile.
Vonage World Mobile costs $24.99/month and is available as a free download at www.vonage.com and the iTunes App Store.
Labels:
mobile VoIP,
VoIP,
Vonage
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Mobile Terminations Now Exceed Fixed
Mobile subscribers have become a powerful force in the international voice market. In 2008, mobile-originated international traffic grew 19 percent, and accounted for 36 percent of total international traffic, up from 32 percent in 2007, according to TeleGeography.
Mobile terminated traffic grew 18 percent in 2008 and accounted for 48 percent of international traffic terminated in 2008. TeleGeography projects that mobile terminated traffic will exceed traffic terminated on fixed lines in 2009.
If you want to know why Sprint is selling "no incremental cost" calling to any domestic U.S. mobile, that is one of the reasons.
That would be a first. Up to this point, more calls have been terminated on fixed phone lines. To be sure, more calls still are originated on fixed lines than mobiles, but even that gap is narrowing.
Mobile phone subscriptions overtook fixed lines in 2002, TeleGeography notes. By 2008, there were four billion
active mobile accounts globally, accounting for 77 percent of global phone lines. In recent years, growth has shifted to developing countries. Mobile subscriber growth in Africa has led the world in recent years, growing 35 percent in 2008 after having increased 39 percent in 2007.
While growth rates in Africa are tremendous, the subscriber base remains very small—mobile penetration in Africa is still only 39 percent.
Still, India gained 112 million new mobile subscribers in 2008, a net increase that exceeds the total number of mobile subscribers in Germany, says TeleGeography.
China gained 89 million mobile subscribers in 2008, and Brazil, Indonesia and Vietnam all gained more than 30 million mobile subscribers. Conversely, mobile subscription growth in more mature markets has slowed.
Mobile terminated traffic grew 18 percent in 2008 and accounted for 48 percent of international traffic terminated in 2008. TeleGeography projects that mobile terminated traffic will exceed traffic terminated on fixed lines in 2009.
If you want to know why Sprint is selling "no incremental cost" calling to any domestic U.S. mobile, that is one of the reasons.
That would be a first. Up to this point, more calls have been terminated on fixed phone lines. To be sure, more calls still are originated on fixed lines than mobiles, but even that gap is narrowing.
Mobile phone subscriptions overtook fixed lines in 2002, TeleGeography notes. By 2008, there were four billion
active mobile accounts globally, accounting for 77 percent of global phone lines. In recent years, growth has shifted to developing countries. Mobile subscriber growth in Africa has led the world in recent years, growing 35 percent in 2008 after having increased 39 percent in 2007.
While growth rates in Africa are tremendous, the subscriber base remains very small—mobile penetration in Africa is still only 39 percent.
Still, India gained 112 million new mobile subscribers in 2008, a net increase that exceeds the total number of mobile subscribers in Germany, says TeleGeography.
China gained 89 million mobile subscribers in 2008, and Brazil, Indonesia and Vietnam all gained more than 30 million mobile subscribers. Conversely, mobile subscription growth in more mature markets has slowed.
Labels:
long distance,
mobile,
Sprint,
voice
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Good News for VoIP, Bad News for Wired Telecom Providers
"VoIP" was the "industry of the decade," according to IBISWorld, which says the industry earned that accolade because of its 1,655 percent growth rate between 2000 and 2009. IBISWorld notes that VoIP, as a new industry, only began to earn any revenue in 2002, so it is starting from a "zero" base.
Wireless telecommunications ranked eighth for industries of the 2000 to 2009 period, posting revenue growth of 183 percent.
IBISWorld also predicts VoIP will show the most revenue growth in the coming decade as well, growing 150 percent between 2010 and 2019.
The bad news for the 2010 to 2019 period is that wired telecommunicatons carriers will show negative 52 percent revenue growth. Telecommunications resellers likewise will show negative 26 percent revenue growth over that same period.
Wireless telecommunications ranked eighth for industries of the 2000 to 2009 period, posting revenue growth of 183 percent.
IBISWorld also predicts VoIP will show the most revenue growth in the coming decade as well, growing 150 percent between 2010 and 2019.
The bad news for the 2010 to 2019 period is that wired telecommunicatons carriers will show negative 52 percent revenue growth. Telecommunications resellers likewise will show negative 26 percent revenue growth over that same period.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Directv-Dish Merger Fails
Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...