Friday, April 16, 2010

User Choice or Imposed Limits: What is Best Way to Manage Bandwidth?

Should the internet treat all data equally, regardless of whether it is part of a multi-gigabyte video file or a short email? Gareth Morgan asks the question in an article at New Scientist.com, after interviewing Johan Pouwelse, a peer-to-peer researcher at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands.
Though many will reflexively object, Morgan says one way to deal with demands placed on the network by very-active users is to bill for consumption of bandwidth, not for access at certain speeds. That charging principle would allow people to alter their own behavior, rather than imposing fixed limits to use.
Nearly two years ago, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) censured network operator Comcast for trying to impose restrictions on "bandwidth hogs" who use BitTorrent and other file-sharing software. These systems eat up huge amounts of data capacity, and so can degrade the service to other customers, he says.
But the key problem remains unresolved: when large numbers of customers want to access the internet simultaneously, how can traffic be managed in a way that prevents those who are transferring huge multimedia files clogging up the network?
Pouwelse suggests that a different kind of charging tariff could help. Instead of charging customers on the basis of download speeds, network operators should charge users and content providers according to how much data they download or upload. "They could do that without interfering with traffic, in an entirely net neutral way," he says.
This proposal would be opposed by internet giants such as Google and Facebook, who generate large volumes of web traffic and so could face higher charges. But with high-speed broadband stimulating an ever-growing appetite for bandwidth, some way must be found to fairly share out the internet's limited resources.
Bandwidth hogs eat away at principle of net neutrality - tech - 16 April 2010 - New Scientist

GPS Using Augmented Reality

Augmented reality adds a layer of information to images viewed by a smartphone camera. So it was only a matter of time before some people figured out that if an iPhone can be mounted properly on the dashboard of a car, the right AR software can be used to enhance the normal GPS navigation functions the native GPS feature of the phone would provide.

As an aside, I notice that Microsoft-powered smartphones now offer a navigation service, but it requires a monthly recurring fee. Since that feature can be used for no incremental cost on an Android phone, I don't see that remaining a viable long-term competitive alternative.

People in competing firms often gnash their teeth when Google disrupts an existing business by giving away something valuable "for free." And that is what Google is doing by giving away turn-by-turn navigation services without requiring users to buy a monthly recurring subscription. Garmin obviously cannot be happy about that.

On the other hand, Google apparently had to spend quite some time and money creating richer data for its service, primarily because creation of a turn-by-turn navigation feature apparently cannot be created simply by importing satellite data, but also requires actual recording of the positions of vehicles as they drive around.

It's not as though Google is simply licensing software or database services from a third party; it had to create new data to enable the feature.

Lots of AR applications add metadata of questionable value. But features related to travel and transportation seem to be exceptions. It often is quite useful to be able to ascertain where the nearest subway station is, or whether the road sign you just read actually goes to the place you want to go, even though that information was not on the road sign.

FCC Has National Broadband Authority, Say 2 Former FCC Commissioners

Former FCC chairmen Reed Hundt (D) and Michael Powell (R) say that, contrary to much speculation, the Federal Communications Commission continues to have the authority it requires to set in motion the "National Broadband Plan."

Both Powell and Hundt agreed that the FCC still has jurisdiction on the Broadband Plan and net neutrality and that there isn’t “Armageddon” because of the DC Circuit ruling on the Comcast complaint.

Powell pointed out that Title II reclassification would have a “destabilizing nature” to the industry because it would change decades-long policy and that it would frustrate investments made under the current regulatory environment (for example the $23 billion investment Verizon made on their “FiOS” service).

The argument that the FCC now "lacks jurisdiction," though incorrect, is being used to advance the notion of wider and more-disruptive changes in the basic regulatory framework governing broadband access services.

Post Tech - The Full Video: Ex-FCC heads Hundt and Powell discuss broadband policy

Thursday, April 15, 2010

FCC National Broadband Plan Does Not Require Title II, AT&T Says

Robert Quinn, Senior VP, federal regulatory, for AT&T, argues that the FCC does not need to redefine broadband as a Title II telecommunications service in order to implement its proposed national broadband plan, particularly its changes to the Universal Service Fund.

The "Open Internet Coalition" including  Google, Sony, Public Knowledge and the Free Press have been arguing for that classification as necessary for the plan's recommendations.

AT&T filed an analysis with the FCC Monday saying it thought the commission still has "all the authority it needs" to migrate the Universal Service Fund from phone to broadband service or to implement the online privacy recommendations. "The FCC has all the authority it needs to go out and do the things it has identified in the national broadband plan," Quinn argues.

He said suggestions that the court decision could significantly impede the broadband plan were overblown, and that classifying it as a more regulated Title II (common carrier) service would chill investment, which could adversely impact broadband deployment.

"I think at a time when we need more than anything else is infrastructure investment, I think it would provide a huge disincentive for entities to invest in this space," Quinn says.

Quinn said, ultimately, Congress may need to step in and clarify the scope of the FCC's broadband oversight, but that in the meantime the FCC has authority over changes to universal service, protecting proprietary customer information online and making broadband accessible to disabilities, for example.

Goats at Google

As it did last year, Google has a herd of goats mowing the grass at its headquarters. I like goats. 

more photos









Cablevision, Time Warner Cable, Comcast Federate New York Hotspots

Federation nearly always is good for widespread adoption of any application. Email and text messaging provide recent examples, as usage exploded once messages were made interoperable. But one can point to any number of other examples, including railroad, telegraph and telephone services, each of which benefitted from interoperability.

A positive usage effect likely will happen for cable public hotspot users as Cablevision Systems Corp., Time Warner Cable Inc. and Comcast Corp. have agreed to allow their broadband Internet subscribers to roam freely across the Wi-Fi deployments of all three major cable operators in the New York metro area.

The agreement will allow customers of those companies to use Wi-Fi for no additional charge in places like Madison Square Park in Manhattan, areas of the Jersey Shore and the Hamptons on Long Island.

In key ways, the agreement attempts to keep pace with public hotspot access offered by Verizon Communications and AT&T. The issue isn't so much the public hotspot access as such, but the fact that cable modem, DSL and wireless dongle services now typically come with "no additional charge" Wi-Fi hotspot access. So any provider that can offer free Wi-Fi at more locations has an advantage retaining and acquiring fixed broadband access customers.

Verizon to Debut Droid Incredible April 29

To the extent that Verizon Wireless is looking for a device that takes the "Droid" one step further,  it probably has one in the coming HTC "Droid Incredible," with many of the features of Google's "Nexus One" phone.

Verizon and HTC say the new device will cost $199.99 after a a $100 mail-in rebate on April 29 with a new two-year contract.

DROID Incredible by HTC is the first Verizon Wireless phone that takes advantage of Qualcomm’s 1GHz superfast Snapdragon processor, and it’s the first available phone from Verizon Wireless to include an 8 megapixel camera.

Shortly after the phone becomes available, customers will be able to enjoy two of the latest exclusive apps from Verizon Wireless, NFL Mobile and Skype mobile.

The new Droid features Android 2.1, a 1GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor; unified
Flickr, Facebook and Twitter updates; an 8-megapixel camera with dual LED flash, a 3.7-inch WVGA (480x800) AMOLED capacitive touch display and an optical joystick for smooth navigation.

The device features a proximity sensor, light sensor and digital compass; integrated GPS and Wi-Fi
(802.11 b/g) as well as a 3.5 mm headset jack.

The Incredible will be available for pre-order online at www.verizonwireless.com beginning on April 19 and it will be in Verizon Wireless Communications Stores on April 29.

Incredible customers will need to subscribe to a Verizon Wireless "Nationwide Talk" and an "Email and Web for Smartphone" plan. Nationwide Talk plans begin at $39.99 monthly access. Email and Web for Smartphone plans start at $29.99 for unlimited monthly access.

HTC is the same company that makes Google's Nexus One.

DIY and Licensed GenAI Patterns Will Continue

As always with software, firms are going to opt for a mix of "do it yourself" owned technology and licensed third party offerings....