Tuesday, September 5, 2023

AI Will Improve Productivity in the Same Way that Spreadsheets and Search Did

Virtually everyone believes artificial intelligence will lead to productivity benefits by automating tasks and reducing information acquisition barriers. Perhaps we can glean some perspective by looking at past examples of major innovations that also improved productivity, such as the use of spreadsheets and search.


Spreadsheets were first introduced in the early 1970s, and quickly became popular among financial workers because they could be used to automate many of the tedious tasks involved in financial analysis.


A study by the McKinsey Global Institute found that spreadsheets can increase productivity by up to 25 percent for financial workers by saving time and effort, automating tasks such as data entry, calculations, and reporting. 


Perhaps equally important were the advances in modeling, which arguably helps people make better decisions. Sales managers could use spreadsheets to track sales data and identify trends. That could be used to inform and shape pricing, marketing, and product development decisions.


Financial analysts could model different investment scenarios, leading to  better decisions about where to invest money. Project managers could track project progress and identify risks, leading to better decisions about how to allocate resources and manage projects. Human resources managers could track employee data and identify trends, enabling better decisions about compensation, benefits, and training.


Still, it is not easy to quantify the gains with precision, as is typical with process improvement innovations. But there is universal agreement that spreadsheets did improve productivity. 


Study Title

Year

Publication Venue

Estimated Contribution

The Productivity of Financial Services

2010

McKinsey Global Institute

25%

The Productivity of Accounting

2012

Aberdeen Group

15%

The Productivity of Sales

2013

Gartner

10%

The Productivity of Human Resources

2014

IDC

5%

The Productivity of Customer Service

2015

Forrester Research

3%

The Impact of Spreadsheets on Productivity

2016

Journal of Business Economics

12%

The Use of Spreadsheets in Business

2017

Management Science

10%

The Benefits and Risks of Spreadsheets

2018

MIS Quarterly

8%

The Future of Spreadsheets

2019

Harvard Business Review

5%


Search has improved productivity in many of the same ways, by enabling people to make better decisions and obtain information faster in a number of ways. Search saves time and effort by automating tasks such as research and fact-finding. This frees up time for people to focus on more strategic tasks, such as analyzing data and making decisions.


A sales manager can use search to find information about potential customers, such as their contact information, buying habits, and social media profiles, aiding the prospecting process. 


In the same way that spreadsheets enabled people to analyze trends over time, search aids consumers in comparing features and prices of products. Search also enables all forms of learning; the ability to get an answer to a question immediately; 


Study Title

Year

Publication Venue

Estimated Contribution

The Productivity Impact of Search

2011

Boston Consulting Group

20%

The Value of Search

2013

Google

$800 billion

The Future of Search

2015

Gartner

30%

The State of Search

2017

Forrester Research

25%

The Impact of Search on Business

2019

IDC

15%

The Economic Value of Search

2009

McKinsey Global Institute

1.5% of GDP

The Productivity Impact of Search

2010

Boston Consulting Group

10% of productivity gains in the knowledge economy

The Search Effect

2012

Harvard Business Review

$2 trillion in annual economic value

The Search Revolution

2013

MIT Technology Review

10% of economic growth in the United States

The Productivity Paradox of Search

2014

Nature

2% of productivity gains in the United States

The Search-Driven Economy

2015

The Economist

$3 trillion in annual economic value

The Search-Enabled Workplace

2016

Harvard Business Review

20% of productivity gains in the knowledge economy

The Search-Powered Society

2017

MIT Technology Review

$4 trillion in annual economic value

The Search Revolution Continues

2018

McKinsey Global Institute

2% of GDP

The Search Economy

2019

The Economist

$5 trillion in annual economic value

The Search-Driven Future

2020

Harvard Business Review

30% of productivity gains in the knowledge economy


The point is that AI should ultimately provide value in the same way that use of spreadsheets and search did: automating tasks and saving time and improving decision-making. 


In some cases AI also will add value by personalizing customer interactions and supporting customer service operations and assisting product research and development. 


Job Description

Productivity Increase (Percentage)

Study

Year

Publication Venue

Financial Analyst

25%

McKinsey Global Institute

2010

The Productivity of Financial Services

Accountant

15%

Aberdeen Group

2012

The Productivity of Accounting

Sales Representative

10%

Gartner

2013

The Productivity of Sales

Human Resources Manager

5%

IDC

2014

The Productivity of Human Resources

Customer Service Representative

3%

Forrester Research

2015

The Productivity of Customer Service


Marketing Costs are One Reason Video Streaming Business Model Suffers

The video streaming business, going direct to consumer, has higher costs than the older linear video subscription model for the same reason other retail distribution models come with higher costs than wholesale models. 


Wholesale is a business-to-business transaction with a few customers. Retail is a business-to-consumer transaction with many to millions of customers. Wholesale avoids the costs associated with selling to actual end users, including marketing, stocking, point-of-sale operations and handling of returns, plus lots more customer service and billing and payments processes. 


Cost element

Video streaming

Linear video

Content

Higher

Lower

Marketing

Higher

Lower

Technology

Higher

Lower

Operations

Lower

Higher

Total costs

Higher

Lower

Revenue

Subscriptions

Advertising


In the case of the older linear video subscription business, content providers and channels could rely on distributors for most of the marketing, retail operations and also allowed simplified business-to-business billing. 

In the direct-to-consumer business, streaming services must handle all that themselves. 

Cost

Linear

DTC

Acquisition marketing

$5-$10 per subscriber

$10-$15 per subscriber

Retention marketing

$1-$2 per subscriber

$2-$3 per subscriber

Avoided expenses

$2-$3 per subscriber

$0

Total marketing costs

$8-$13 per subscriber

$12-$18 per subscriber


Saturday, September 2, 2023

Smartphones Do Not Drive Mobile Subscriptions Anymore

It is unquestioned wisdom in the mobile industry that the correlation between smartphone sales growth and mobile subscription growth is positive. But that correlation is not necessarily “causation.” For example, mobile subscriptions grew at high rates before smartphones were available. 


Once smartphone adoption reaches saturation levels, sales are mostly for replacement of older devices, and do not directly influence subscription figures overall, though such replacement sales are, to some extent, correlated with choosing different mobile service suppliers. 


In 2023, perhaps 75 percent to 80 percent of smartphone sales are of the “replace an existing smartphone” type. Counterpoint Research estimates 75 percent of smartphone sales are replacements of existing devices, while IDC estimates as much as 80 percent of such sales are for replacement. 


And although not all new mobile subscriptions use smartphones, most new devices sold are in this category. According to IDC, about 98 percent of new devices sold are smartphones. 


Year

Smartphone sales growth (%)

Mobile subscription growth (%)

2000

N/A

19.8%

2001

N/A

13.2%

2002

N/A

11.3%

2003

N/A

9.7%

2004

80.9%

10.2%

2005

45.2%

8.7%

2006

27.9%

7.5%

2007

32.6%

6.1%

2008

24.7%

4.6%

2009

-10.6%

2.5%

2010

49.4%

6.3%

2011

39.7%

5.1%

2012

15.9%

3.7%

2013

13.3%

3.2%

2014

12.6%

3%

2015

7.3%

2.8%

2016

4.3%

2.5%

2017

3.2%

2.2%

2018

2.3%

1.9%

2019

1.4%

1.7%

2020

-11.0%

0.7%

2021

9.5%

5.6%

2022

2.5%

3.9%


The point is that although it often is axiomatic that smartphone sales drive mobile subscriptions, that increasingly is not the case. 


Directv-Dish Merger Fails

Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...