It No Longer Really Matters Whether "Users Need a Gig"

It probably no longer makes sense to argue about whether gigabit Internet access “should” be deployed at a time when “nobody needs a gig.” The reason is that the shift to gigabit networks is not driven by direct end user demand, at the moment.

Instead, gigabit access speeds are strategic matter, driven by the level of intensifying competition in fixed and mobile networks, all of which are moving rather swiftly in the direction of gigabit and multi-gigabit capabilities. And that is being done irrespective of immediate end user demand.

Australia’s National Broadband Network (NBN), for example, says “14 percent of NBN’s fixed line services used a 100/40 Mbps wholesale speed tier, 49 percent used a 25/5 Mbps wholesale speed tier and 32 percent used a 12/1 Mbps wholesale speed tier” in 2015.

In 2014, those tiers were at 18 percent for 100 Mbps plans, 42 percent for 25 Mbps plans and 35 percent for 12 Mbps plans.

Note that demand for 100 Mbps actually dropped, year over year, while demand for 25 Mbps plans grew.

It is one thing to argue that the cost of upgrading immediately to gigabit fiber-to-home networks will not yield sufficient return to justify making the investment.

It is quite another matter to argue that cable TV operators, using hybrid fiber coax, likely can justify selling gigabit speeds, and already are preparing for multi-gigabit speeds, over their hybrid networks, without resorting to fiber to the home.

Likewise, the global mobile ecosystem is preparing for “gigabit to every device” in the earliest versions of 5G networks, with clear development paths for multi-gigabit and 10 Gbps 5G speeds.

At the same time, 4G networks are using channel bonding to boost 4G speeds up to the multi-hundreds of megabits per second range, whether or not there is direct and immediate end user demand.

As has been the case in the past, next generation networks are being developed for strategic reasons, not driven by direct end user demand.

Some competitors not required to use fiber to home platforms are going to market gigabit services themselves, in large part to maintain or take a lead over their key competitors. Mobile operators, on the other hand, see an opportunity to take market share from fixed services, for the first time, on a widespread scale.

Under such conditions, it doesn’t make much sense to debate, any longer, whether “users need gigabit.” They do not, at present. That is not the point, however. Internet service providers see a need to provide such capabilities, for strategic reasons and as clear marketing tools.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spectrum Fees, High Incremental Capex, Lower Value in Ecosystem Mean Historic Changes Might be Necessary

For Ting, Operating Costs are Key to Business Model

Lower FTTH Costs Improve the Business Model, But How Much?