Saturday, August 22, 2020

"High Tech, High Touch" Patterns Will Return

The prevailing wisdom about business life after Covid-19 often is that “nothing will be the same.” In place of “high touch” face-to-face meetings, businesses are going to substitute “high tech” virtual sales and marketing. That might happen, to a significant and permanent degree. 

At the same time, firms are going to rediscover the value of face-to-face, “high touch” activities, perhaps to the same degree as they shift to virtual “high tech” operations. It has been a 40-year trend. 


Some of us remember a 1982 book called Megatrends by futurist John Naisbitt that popularized the phrase “high tech, high touch” to describe a coming trend: that as we began to use more technology, we would equally appreciate “high touch” human or non-technological interactions. He explored how that had evolved in his follow-on book High Tech, High Touch


Here’s the important insight into post-Covid-19 business behavior: High-touch refers to the human and emotional aspects of business interactions, including the establishment of trust


Virtual support can be quite effective once a business relationship and trust have been established. But it arguably will be harder to create trust with a new prospect using only “high tech” tools. 


High-touch refers to close relationships with customers, interacting with people, not just machines.  To be sure, that arguably can be done, up to a point, virtually. But high-touch also arguably requires above-average interaction with customers, and that includes face-to-face contact. 


High touch--helping customers on a human level through various stages of the buying process and lifecycle--involves a much higher participation, and usually relies on one individual or team within the company to maintain direct, personal and frequent contact with accounts, says ESG. 

“Humans crave the kind of interaction that only other humans can provide,” and likely cannot always be provided by conferencing tools. 


It’s one that places the priority on human interaction and human relationships, not on efficiency or speed. That is why travel services emphasize both touch and tech. 


“In a high tech world, people are longing for balance,” notes EHL Insights. As important as technology has become for customer experience and support, “authenticity” and “emotion” also are emphasized. There is an analogy for business-to-business sales as well. 


This “reversion to mean” happens quite often. Right now, professionals now rely on videoconferencing to supplant face-to-face meetings because nothing else is possible. But after the pandemic ends, prior trends will reassert themselves.


That has proven to be true for industries and economies in recoveries from major economic disruptions in the recent past. 


If evidence from three past global recessions--but not the Great Recession of 2008 and the Great Cessation of 2020--provide any useful insight, the recovery might take between three and 4.5 years, perhaps three years for public companies, perhaps 4.5 years for the overall economy. 


Some 17 percent of public  firms will not survive. That is the percentage of public firms that went bankrupt, were acquired, or became private, in the aftermath of the Great Recession. 


About 80 percent of the survivors had not yet regained their pre-recession growth rates for sales and profits three years after a recession. 


About 40 percent of the firms had not returned to their absolute pre-recession sales and profits levels after three years. 


Ranjay Gulati, Harvard Business School professor and Nitin Nohria, Harvard Business School dean, conducted a study in 2010 of corporate performance during three global recessions: the 1980 crisis (which lasted from 1980 to 1982), the 1990 slowdown (1990 to 1991), and the 2000 bust (2000 to 2002). 


Obviously, the two big events missing from the study, because of the timing, were the Great Recession of 2008 and the current “Great Cessation” of 2020. Still, their findings are useful for charting the likely path of recovery after the Covid-19 pandemic recedes into history.


They studied 4,700 public companies, breaking down the data into three periods: the three years before a recession, the three years after, and the recession years themselves. 


At a macroeconomic level, the U.S. economy had not recovered its pre-2008 levels by 2011, three years after the Great Great Recession of 2008. 


source: Bureau of Economic Analysis


U.S. growth rates returned to 2007 levels about 4.5 years after the Great Recession. Latin America and some Asian countries bounced back really fast, in about 1.5 years.


So if the recovery from the Great Cessation follows the Great Recession pattern, it will take about four years for gross national product to return to 2019 levels. 


The impact on household wealth was starker, as median household net worth still had not reached 2007 levels by 2018, 10 years after the Great Recession. Job levels in the United States had returned to 2007 levels by 2014 (about six years after the Great Recession). 


Still, prior trends reasserted themselves. That is likely to happen with face-to-face “high touch” sales in the business-to-business markets as well. It might take some time, but it is almost certainly going to happen. 


No comments:

Will AI Actually Boost Productivity and Consumer Demand? Maybe Not

A recent report by PwC suggests artificial intelligence will generate $15.7 trillion in economic impact to 2030. Most of us, reading, seein...