Wednesday, November 6, 2024

We Might Have to Accept Some Degree of AI "Not Net Zero"

An argument can be made that artificial intelligence operations will consume vast quantities of electricity and water, as well as create lots of new e-waste. It's hard to argue with that premise. After all, any increase in human activity--including computing intensity--will have that impact.


Some purists might insist we must be carbon neutral or not do AI. Others of us might say we need to make the same sorts of trade offs we must make everyday, for all our activities that have some impact on water, energy consumption or production of e-waste.


We have to balance outcomes and impacts, benefits and costs, while working over time to minimize those impacts. Compromise, in other words.


Some of us would be unwilling to accept "net zero" outcomes if it requires poor people to remain poor; hungry people to remain hungry.


And not all of the increase in e-waste, energy or water consumption is entirely attributable to AI operations. Some portion of the AI-specific investment would have been made in any case to support the growth of demand for cloud computing. 


 So there is a “gross” versus “net” assessment to be made, for data center power, water and e-waste purposes resulting from AI operations. 


By definition, all computing hardware will eventually become “e-waste.” So use of more computing hardware implies more e-waste, no matter whether the use case is “AI” or just “cloud computing.” And we will certainly see more of both. 


Also, “circular economy” measures will certainly be employed to reduce the gross amount of e-waste for all servers. So we face a dynamic problem: more servers, perhaps faster server replacement cycles, more data centers and capacity, offset by circular economy efficiencies and hardware and software improvements. 


Study Name

Date

Publishing Venue

Key Conclusions

The E-waste Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence

2023

ResearchGate

Quantifies server requirements and e-waste generation of generative AI (GAI). Finds that GAI will grow rapidly, with potential for 16 million tons of cumulative waste by 2030. Calls for early adoption of circular economy measures.

Circular Economy Could Tackle Big Tech Gen-AI E-Waste

2023

EM360

Introduces a computational framework to quantify and explore ways of managing e-waste generated by large language models (LLMs). Estimates annual e-waste production could increase from 2.6 thousand metric tons in 2023 to 2.5 million metric tons per year by 2030. Suggests circular economy strategies could reduce e-waste generation by 16-86%.

AI has a looming e-waste problem

2023

The Echo

Estimates generative AI technology could produce 1.2-5.0 million tonnes of e-waste by 2030 without changes to regulation. Suggests circular economy practices could reduce this waste by 16-86%.

E-waste from generative artificial intelligence"

2024

Nature Computational Science

Predicts AI could generate 1.2-5.0 million metric tons of e-waste by 2030; suggests circular economy strategies could reduce this by up to 86%1

2

"AI and Compute"

2023

OpenAI (blog)

Discusses exponential growth in computing power used for AI training, implying potential e-waste increase, but doesn't quantify net impact

"The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink"

2024

MIT Technology Review

Focuses on energy use rather than e-waste, but suggests efficiency improvements may offset some hardware demand growth


No comments:

We Might Have to Accept Some Degree of AI "Not Net Zero"

An argument can be made that artificial intelligence operations will consume vast quantities of electricity and water, as well as create lot...