Shocking Change in Video Behavior?

Is linear video about to take an unprecedented hit? A stunning new poll suggests it is possible, even if the results are shockingly different from any others taken so far.

Nobody ever seems surprised by surveys or polls suggesting younger users consume media differently than older users.

A new survey of 1,660 ChangeWave members suggests the changes in media consumption--though not a substitution of online video for linear video--are spreading to users between the ages of 45 and 63 as well.

The Baby Boomers surveyed now spend more free time online han they do watching traditional TV. Where they use the Internet 12.9 hours a week, they use TV 11.8 hours a week.

So what about substitution of online video for linear video? The results do not suggest users are switching video viewing to online mechanisms: they simply are watching less TV.

By a five-to-one margin, respondents say they are watching less traditional television than they did a year ago.

Among this group, 62 percent say it’s because they’re not as interested in what's on TV these days, and another 26 percent say they’re spending more time surfing the Web.

The big question is whether the linear video business model will face pressure as a result, not because users are watching online, but because TV itself is not as interesting. That might be the case.

Among traditional TV viewers, 20 percent say they’re likely to downgrade or cancel their current TV service package in the next six months. That is a bombshell. No other survey I am aware of has suggested anything like this level of dissatisfaction with linear video subscriptions.

The likelihood of canceling is highest among cable and satellite subscribers, 22 percent of whom say they are likely to do so, while just seven percent of fiber-optic TV subscribers say they are likely to do so.

Respondents delivered bombshell results on another question as well. When asked which one paid subscription they’d be most willing to give up, 44 percent said their video subscriptions. In virtually all other surveys I am aware of, TV has been least likely to be dropped.

So radically do these findings differ that one suspects there is sampling bias. But if there is something changing out there among the "Boomer" demographic, we ought to know soon enough. Though I cannot imagine shifts of this magnitude, we ought to see softening of cable and satellite video subscriptions within a year or so.

This bears watching. Because the results are so divergent from all others, there is risk of sampling error: the self-selected respondents might not be typical of the wider population. But it also is possible the survey is detecting a radical shift of sentiment that has not occurred before.

The results are unprecedented, and shocking.

1.3 Exabytes of Mobile Video Consumed in 2017

Portable laptop and netbook users will consume 1.3 exabytes of video content per month by 2017, a sixty-fold increase over 2009, says Coda Research Consultancy. If that forecast proves correct, mobile video will account for nearly 75 percent of all mobile traffic.

The top region for video consumption will be Asia Pacific, which will account for just over half (53 percent) of all video traffic globally. In contrast, Europe will account for 26 percent of all global video traffic, and North America 14 percent.

The Asia Pacific region will be so prominent because mobile broadband will be for many the primary or exclusive way of getting access to the Internet, the company says.

The report shows that two thirds of global traffic using by portables will be on Long Term Evolution (LTE) networks by 2017.

Mobile Video the Next Big Thing?

Mobile video is considered by many to be among the next big things in mobility use and service provider revenue.

It likely also will be a big driver of consumption calculators, bigger data plans and at-home or Wi-Fi connections.

The reason is physics. Video requires two orders of magnitude worth of bandwidth compared to most other applications. That's a 100 times greater load placed on a network and a user's bandwidth cap.

Some people think Wi-Fi is a transitional access technology, to be replaced by mobile broadband connections. That's not likely. In the business world, Wi-Fi is replacing Ethernet wired networks on a permanent basis.

In the consumer space, Wi-Fi is replacing wired connections as well. And in the public space, Wi-Fi is getting much more use by mobile handsets, where the original connected device was a PC. As video consumption grows, users quickly are going to figure out they can reduce pressure on their bandwidth caps by using Wi-Fi as often as possible, and especially for video streaming or downloads.

Mobile video might be the next big thing in any number of ways.

Online and Mobile Video Still Incremental to TV

It still appears that online and mobile video consumption is incremental to regular TV viewing, The Nielsen Company says.

“Although we have seen the computer and mobile phone screens taking on a significant role, their emergence has not been at the cost of TV viewership,” says Jim O’Hara, The Nielsen Co. president. The reason is that consumers simply are increasing the total amount of video they consume.

“The entire media universe is expanding so consumers are choosing to add elements to their media experience, rather than to replace them,” O'Hara says.

Nielsen data also shows Americans are using DVRs more than ever, watching one hour more of timeshifted TV each month than a year ago. Currently, 30 percent of homes in the U.S. have DVR devices.

During the second quarter of 2009, the number of people watching mobile video increased 70 percent from last year and people who watch video online increased their viewing by 46 percent compared to a year ago. In addition, the average American TV consumption remains at an all-time high (141 hours per month) compared to the same time frame last year.

Online usage is relatively flat since last year, though more people are viewing video online than ever before. But adults 18 to 24 watch more than five hours each month.

Short form video (such as YouTube clips) still makes up 83 percent of online video viewing, while name-brand TV network content comprises the majority of mobile video viewing.

Mobile video viewing continues its upward trend, with over 15 million Americans reporting watching mobile video in the second quarter of 2009, an increase of 70 percent versus last year and the largest annual growth yet seen, Nielsen says.

Apple Approves Vonage for iPhone

Apple has approved an official Vonage VoIP application to give iPhone users the ability to make voice calls over WiFi, as does the Skype app for iPhone.

The restriciton to "WiFi only" is part of an agreement with AT&T to not allow customers to use their network to initiate VoIP sessions using the AT&T 3G network.

The decision does not go as far as many would like, but as far as the current agreement with AT&T will allow. But change will come, though not fast enough to suit some. Over a 10-year period between 1997 and 2007, for example, U.S. communication service providers replaced the nearly 50 percent of revenue derived from long distance charges with an equivalent amount of wireless revenue.

It would be reasonable to suggest that IP services and mobile broadband likewise will, over a possibly similar amount of time, also transition from reliance on voice revenues to a reliance on mobile broadband and data services. In fact, such a transition is virtually required, as 3G and 4G networks do not support the existing voice format for technical reasons.

That said, it is no so clear that all voice will be consumed using any particular VoIP business model. Some portion will be provided by third parties, while some will be provided by the carrier themselves. Over time, though, there is little debate about the relative importance of the voice revenue stream declining while the relative importance of the data streams increases.

Given the already-reasonable retail cost of domestic U.S. calling, VoIP might have the most obvious impact in the global calling market, where per-minute prices are much higher.

That said, a mobile voice capability actually is a bundle of several values. The simple ability to make and take local or domestic calls is analogous to the function of a voice fixed line. Most mobile plans, and most VoIP plans, alrready eliminate the distinction between local and domestic long distance calling. The difference between "unlimited" plans, and "buckets of minutes" also already is being narrowed, at least for domestic U.S. calling.

The ability to place international calls has many product substitututes, including VoIP, but also including calling cards, for example. Email, instant messaging and text messaging are functional, if not complete substitutes as well.

It might take a while, but relatively standard use of mobile VoIP is coming, as it likewise ultimately will come in the landline business as well. But complete change will take quite some time.

Hulu Cannibalizes Pay Per View, DVR

There's one take-away we ought to gain from looking at the number of subscribers to multi-channel video entertainment services or users of Hulu.

And the take-away is that Hulu cannibalizes pay per view or on-demand programming or digital video recorder income that otherwise might be gained by linear video providers.

On the other hand, we might also note that the revenue potential to be gained from time-shifted services is not all that great at the moment.

The issue is much the same as now experienced by content publishers in most other areas. Namely, that although online distribution costs are lower, revenues are much lower. There remains a revenue gap for online distribution compared to legacy distribution that is not yet fully understood, yet.

Some service providers think the answer might be "TV Everywhere," where a user paying for a linear video subscription can watch that content on mobiles or broadband-connected PCs. The business issue there is just about as challenging: the revenue comes from keeping a multi-channel video subscription. Most of the rest of the distribution is just cost.

The Difference Between Video and Music Business Models

The video business is different from the music business in one significant respect: where people routinely prefer to own their personal collections, they rarely want to "own" news, sports and most serial TV fare. That has some fairly signficant implications for business models. "Buy to own" makes logical sense for consumers of music. "Rent to view" makes more sense for most video and movie fare.

The historic example is the difference between adoption of cable TV and adoption of subscription music services. There are perhaps 20 million XM Sirius subscribers, compared to 63 million cable TV subscribers, plus three million telco video subs and 31 million satellite TV subscribers. In other words, there are 97 million video subscribers, compared to 20 million XM Sirius subscribers.

Most video watchers want to see news, sports and other events only once, movies once or twice. Most music listeners want to own and listen to some favorite songs over and over again. That suggests a stronger market opportunity for video subscriptions, compared to music subscriptions, and a larger market for on-demand video than on-demand music streaming.

Is there a business model for mobile TV?

The number of mobile TV users continues to grow but there is still no proven business model so far to market the service, researchers at Infocom say.

"Japan, South Korea and Italy are the leading markets for broadcast-based mobile TV services but mobile TV subscriber growth in these markets is driven mainly by free or partly-free access and rather large handset availability, Infocom says.

Much could change with time, but there are some features and services for which there is in fact no apparent stand alone business model. Consider the Wi-Fi hotspot business. For an increasing number of service providers, the business model is fixed broadband, and Wi-Fi access is simply an added feature of the broadband service.

The same thing appears to be happening in the multi-channel video business, as service providers test the idea of "TV Everywhere," where paying for a fixed video subscription also allows access to video from PCs and mobile phones.

Advertising might help, but possibly not as much as people suppose. At this point, it appears possible that the mobile TV business model is fixed network multi-channel video, much as Wi-Fi now is a feature available to broadband access subscribers.

Does Netflix Model have Legs?

One of the enduring lessons of new technology adoption is that the transition from older patterns to newer patterns can take quite a long time. One of the other lessons is that older ways of doing things sometimes do not fall before the new.

There was a time when TCP/IP was considered a transitional signaling method that would be replaced by the open systems interconnection model promulgated by the International Organization for Standardization. That never happened.

There was a time when Integrated Services Digital Network was seen as a replacement for time division multiplexing networks, on the way to a next generation network based on B-ISDN using asynchronous transfer mode. ATM proved a modest success, but has been eclipsed by IP.

Everybody "knows" that linear video will someday soon be eclipsed, possibly replaced by, Internet-delivered video, consumed on an on-demand basis. So far, that transition is proceeding slowly, which is typical for most technology substitutions.

What is more interesting: the extent to which the Netflix "DVD by mail" channel has more legs than people suspect. Though both the Blockbuster retail model and the Netflix models have been considered "toast" for some years, Netflix keeps defying expectations, even as it readies itself for the digital delivery shift.

Kaufman Bros. analyst Aaron Kessler has raised his rating on Netflix to "buy" from "hold," based at least in part on a survey of 700 Internet users, which found that 20 percent of all respondents that aren’t currently Netflix subscribers plan to sign up for DVD by mail service in the next five years. Repeat: "five years."

Kessler argues that, over the next five years, the country as a whole could reach near 20 percent Netflix subscription penetration.

The “DVD by mail life cycle may be longer than current thinking,” he says. “While we would agree that a large percentage of the DVD rental market will move to digital in the long term, our survey indicates that the current life cycle of physical rentals may be longer than people think."

Specifically, 68 percent of respondents indicated that “the ability to watch videos on the Internet versus renting from a physical store or by mail” is not important to them.

About 26 percent said online video was "somewhat" important and only six percent said it was " "important." Ultimately, much will hinge on how broadly content owners and ISPs support Internet delivery, as well as pricing models they choose to employ.

But it is worth noting how indifferent most users say they are to Internet-delivered on-demand programming compared to retail rental or DVD by mail alternatives.

In the communications and computing business, one always has a fundamental choice: substitute local processing for remote processing, and local storage for remote storage. In other words, one always can make an engineering trade off between communications and local processing and storage.

The "DVD by mail" alternative substitutes local processing for communications (physical media is an alternative to network delivery).

Online video substitututes communications for local resources, in the same way that "broadcast" video substitututes communications for local processing and storage.

Though the conventional wisdom is that users value and want on-demand video, Kessler's survey suggests otherwise. Users don't care as much as we sometimes think. Unlike news, sports and other "real time" content, where immediacy, in fact "shared experience" is important, movie content can be time shifted, place shifted or device shifted with little apparent downside.

That suggests demand for news, sports and other "real time" content will shift to online faster than "non-real time" pre-recorded video.

All of which is a reminder that we all have to be careful about assuming we know very much about what users actually want, how much they value various delivery and consumption channels and what they are willing to pay for experiences.

Netflix might prove to have a longer-lasting future than most of us now think. But that has been true for several years.

Might the same be true for other applications and services most of us assume are "toast?"

For Mobile Web, "Developed" and "Developing" Markets Are the Same

Is “Developing Market” a meaningless term where it comes to use of the mobile Web? Declan Lonergan, Yankee Group analyst, thinks so. That doesn't mean the markets are identical. Developing markets rely on handsets whose monthly cost is $5, developed market users often pay $40 to $80 a month.

Despite those differences, consumers everywhere want access to the mobile Web. When they get it, their usage profiles are surprisingly consistent, Longergan says.

The top 10 countries for Opera Mini usage during June 2009 were Russia, Indonesia, India, China, Ukraine, South Africa, U.S., U.K., Poland and Nigeria. India continued to move up the rankings, overtaking China for third place, Opera reports. These results demonstrate the huge appetite for access to the mobile Web in developing markets.

Yankee Group in 2008 found use of the top-10 most popular mobile phone services were almost identical in developed and developing regions.

Penetration of mobile Web browsing in the Gulf (11 percent) and in Europe (14 percent) was also very close.

América Móvil (AMX) as a point of reference. AMX is a leading provider of mobile services in Latin America, with subsidiaries in 18 countries including Brazil, Argentina and Colombia. As of June 30, 2009, it had more than 190 million mobile customers and three million land lines in the Americas. In most countries, AMX targets primarily low-ARPU prepaid customers. It has 42 percent mobile customer market share in Latin America. Its closest challenger is Telefonica with 29 percent.

The differences between developed and developing markets are small, Lonergan says. The most successful services are consistently messaging (dominated by SMS), mobile broadband, personalization (ringtones) and mobile Web. Mobile Web use is being driven by consumers accessing social networking sites like Facebook.

AMX is emphasizing mobile social networking by providing access to brands like Facebook, MySpace and Orkut (Google) in Brazil. It also offers branded chat, photo and video blog services. AMX’s subsidiaries Telcel and Comcel provide public photo- and video-sharing sites.

Telcel offers a B2C interface that allows amateur contributions to be uploaded and purchased.

The most frequently visited sites by customers using Vodafone’s mobile Internet service are Facebook, Google, BBC, YouTube, Windows Live, Bebo and eBay "We can conclude, therefore, that operators in developing and developed markets are offering broadly similar MI service portfolios," says Lonergan.

But some differences will persist, particularly when we focus on the least advanced markets. The use of SMS is one example. In sub-Saharan Africa, SMS remains a critical platform for service innovation and will continue to be the focal point for local entrepreneurial initiatives.

Mobile data services account for 15 percent of AMX’s revenue today while European operators typically achieve 20 to 30 percent.

"In our conversations with various players throughout developing regions, we have heard evidence of average consumption of up to 1.5 GB per month per user," says Lonergan. "This is close to levels generally seen among low-end users on land line connections."

Is Qwest VOD Coming?

Qwest Communications is a laboratory of sorts for incumbent telcos that do not have the resources and customer heft to justify launching IPTV services. Many small, rural telcos with small subscriber bases find that most customers already subscribe either to a satellite TV service or a competing cable TV service, for example.

Qwest has decided to rely on partner DirecTV for its multi-channel video offering, but has been interested for years in ways to use its broadband access plant to supplement linear TV with true video-on-demand services. Now that Qwest has upgraded many of its metro networks to operate at 40 Mbps in the downstream, with plans to serve 23 metro markets with services that fast, we might finally see some movement in that direction.

That would have important ramifications for many smaller and independent firms as well. If it works, if revenue for a true VOD service, built in conjunctionw with DirecTV does prove financially interesting, the same approach can be taken by many smaller operators as well.

That is not to say IPTV cannot work. AT&T and Verizon are prime examples of firms with enough customer base and resources to do so. And many indpendent telcos have concluded that IPTV still makes sense. But IPTV remains a tough proposition for many smaller providers. On-demand video might offer a solution. But Qwest likely will be the key test of that theory.

Qwest's approach also might prove helpful if cannibalization of linear multi-channel video actually does start to happen on a significant level. In that case, Qwest will have preserved scarce capital for robust access bandwidth upgrades, and then will be in positiont to push ahead aggressively with a VOD plan without risk of cannibalizing its linear video base.

That would challenge the conventional wisdom, which is that a stand-alone VOD effort will fail without the ability to offer linear TV as well. Of course, Qwest already has that covered, with its DirecTV partnership.

Video Tipping Point in 2010?

The mass-market tipping point for online video will occur in 2010, when online video will be viewed by 50 percent of U.S. consumers, says eMarketer.

Online video also will achieve a 59 percent penetration rate in 2013, up from 47 percent in 2009.

The number of U.S. online video viewers will grow to 188 million in 2013, up from 144 million in 2009, says eMarketer.

Online video viewers will make up 85 percent of Internet users in 2013, up from 72 percent in 2009.

“This will put online video within range of Web activities such as search and e-mail, which are nearly at saturation points among U.S. Internet users,” says Paul Verna, eMarketer senior analyst.

The ability to share video through social networks, blogs, microblogs, e-mail and other social platforms will play a role. So will mobility.

All of that will hasten the day when changes must be made--especially on mobile networks--relating to end user consumption and pricing.

Verizon Wireless Unveils Cross-Network, Cross-Device, Cross-OS App Store

Up to this point, "application stores" have been device specific. But Verizon Wireless is launching the first cross-device, cross-network application development effort and store. Specifically, developers can create apps running across four different mobile providers and operating systems ranging from Research in Motion, Android, Windows Mobile, Palm and Symbian operating systems.

The “Joint Innovation Lab” is a consortium consisting including Verizon, China Mobile, Vodafone and Softbank. That platform, which will push common standards for developers, will allow those developers to reach a billion customers on all four networks.

The consortium will offer its own software developer kit and open up handset and service application programming interfaces to developers.

This is important: until now, developers have had to design apps to work with the dozens of handsets supported by each carrier. Now, however, Verizon says it will offer tools so developers can write one app that will work on all handsets developed under the JIL standard.

The JIL will feature common application access management standards, including for things such as billing and common application management standards.

The app store will be run by Qualcomm. The storefront will be available on the Internet, mobile web and through a portal on the handset, and is expected to be operational by the end of 2009.

Many obstacles must be surmounted, of course, but the effort is qualitatively different from all prior app store efforts, in offering cross-network, cross device and operating system capabilities.

http://deals.venturebeat.com/2009/07/28/verizon-promises-developers-access-to-a-billion-customers-so-there-apple/

Satellite Gains 3.5%, Cable Flat, says Centris

Satellite TV providers have gained 3.5 percent more subscribers, while cable TV operators were essentially flat for the period, say researchers at Centris. And while some have noted sluggishness in ownership of Blu-Ray video players, adoption grew 71 percent over the last year.

There were 7.2 million Blu-Ray households in the first quarter of 2008 and 12.3 million Blu-Ray households in the first quarter of 2009.

Some 32 million households now subscribe to satellite-delivered multi-channel TV service, up from 30.9 million a year ago.

Nearly 63 million households have cable TV, but pay-per-view is quite flat. In April 2009 Centris reported that 12.6 million households ordered PPV in a typical month, unchanged from 2008.

In the first quarter of 2009, about 64 percent of all US households access the Internet each month, up nine percent over 2008, and representing growth of about nine percent.

About 80 percent of all homes accessing the Internet did so using broadband, a 17 percent increase over 2008. The percentage of homes using broadband has grown at about a 17-percent rate over the last three years, Centris says.

Mobile Streaming Video Grows 58% Last Quarter

Worldwide mobile data bandwidth usage has grown 30 percent during the second quarter of 2009, says Allot Communications. Asia leads the growth with 36 percent; Europe posted 28 percent growth and the Americas 25 percent.

Heavy data users do not distinguish between their fixed and their mobile networks and seem to expect the same service from the Internet, irrespective of their access method, the report says.

That is going to be a problem, for the same reason a small percentage of heavy users create performance issues for all other users, one might reasonably conclude. The other issue is that the fastest-growing traffic type is streaming video, which grew 58 percent during the quarter. Since streaming video requires 100 times the bandwidth of a voice call, you can imagine what the problem is.

The other issue is that mobile traffic is not evenly distributed: some locations get dramatically more demand than others. Peer-to-peer traffic, for example, accounts for 42 percent of bandwidth utilization in the busiest cells on the network, but only 21 percent in the average cell.

Since mobile licenses are awarded in ways that mean usable bandiwidth in any one location is limited, fancier engineering, higher network cost and more-sophisticated traffic engineering are required at some cell sites, though others might manage just fine.

Internet Rivals TV as Top Leisure Pursuit

The Internet now rivals TV as a favorite leisure activity, say researchers at Frank Magid Associates (click image for larger view). And computer or game consoles are not far behind.

U.S. Internet Growth 3% to 2013

The total number of people online will grow by over 45 percent to 2.2 billion users — with much of that growth occurring in Asia — over the next five years, according to Forrester Research.

Asia remains the biggest global Internet growth engine: 43 percent of the world's online population will reside in Asia by 2013, with 17 percent of the global online population in China.

Growth rates in the US, Western Europe, and the major industrialized nations in Asia Pacific such as Australia, Japan, and South Korea will slow to between one percent and three percent.

That is a significant finding, as it suggests most people who want to use the Internet already do so.

Online penetration in the United States will rise from 73 percent to 82 percent over the next five years, representing about a three percent annual growth rate.

By 2013, U.S. online penetration will be on par with the most highly penetrated markets of Europe and Asia, such as the Netherlands, the UK, Japan, and South Korea.

By about 2013, if not before, there also will not be any material difference between people using the Internet and people using broadband, other analysts project. That should lead policymakers to take a harder look at the costs and benefits of any programs designed to "increase" use of broadband access.

The United States is about at the point where non-use of broadband is directly linked to non-use of broadband.

http://www.forrester.com/ER/Press/Release/0,1769,1296,00.html

Ads Won't Support Online TV Business

Too many media-related companies mistakenly believe their conventional advertising, subscription or even free business models will simply transfer over to a connected marketplace. They won't, says Diane Mermigas, Mediapost columnist.

But that's a mistake common to other industries buffeted by IP technology, such as the telecommunications, wireless and music industries, for example. The entire global telelcommunications business, for example, is finding itself facing a nearly-complete replacement of its underlying voice revenue model.

Media firms face something similar. Advertising has been 37 percent of all content revenues, and nearly half of all video revenue.

But advertising is expected to comprise only one quarter of domestic online video revenue by 2012. "The economics are simply not there for advertising to support online video, given rising variable costs and limited scale," says UBS analyst Matthieu Coppet.

There are some other, less quantifiable potential issues as well. Most believe online distribution will be more important in the future. The only issue is how important, and how long the change takes.

At the same time, cable TV's key value proposition--more choice--now is running into potential exhaustion. "Choice" is easier on the Internet.

Also, since most viewers watch a handful of channels (possibly seven to 16), adding more channels, and raising prices to match, is going to run out of gas. It seems to me the only issue is when.

There's a reason so many of us spend so much time thinking about evolving business models. If IP technology affects your core business, it also means your core business is going to face huge business model change.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/145967-media-must-start-anew-mine-connectivity?source=feed

New iPhone Boosts Mobile Video Uploads 400% a Day

Once again, we have evidence that Apple iPhone users behave quite differently from other smart phone users, and in ways with broad ramifications for mobile bandwidth consumption.

Since June 19, when the Apple iPhone 3GS came out, uploads from mobile phones have increased by 400 percent a day, YouTube says.

By way of comparison, over the last six months, uploads from mobile phones to YouTube have jumped 1700 percent, say Dwipal Desai, YouTube product manager and Mia Quagliarello, community manager.

Online Video Seen As Biggest Growth Opportunity in 2009

A broad cross section of executives from the telecom, cable, broadcast, mobile, satellite, consumer electronics, ISP and content businesses--but heavily weighted to broadcast industry firms--think video is the consumer service with the brightest prospects for growth in 2009.

In total, about 70 percent of survey respondents to a Pike & Fischer survey are from the video or radio industries, so it perhaps is not surprising that online video and high-definition TV emerged as the applications seen as having the greatest opportunities for growth in 2009.

About 27 percent of respondents cited Web-based video as the broadband application that will generate the highest adoption rates in 2009, though a quarter  believe HDTV will get the biggest number of new users.

But executives from cable and telephone companies were most likely to see online video as the fastest-growing application in 2009. More than half of cable executives and 56 percent of telephone industry executives said they believed online video would have the greatest growth.

About 40 percent of content provider executives and 29 percent of broadcast industry executives thought HDTV would be the fastest-growing app this year, a prediction boosted by the digital TV transition, which by definition replaces standard-definition over the air broadcasting with HDTV substitutes.