Top 20 Mobile Firms Globally

Ranked by subscribers, rather than revenue, here are the 20 largest mobile service providers, globally, compiled by Wireless Intelligence. 

Rank	Operator-group	Connections (million) 1	YoY growth, connections	YoY change, rank	Mobile revenue (US$ billion)
1	China Mobile	616.8	11%	-	20.3
2	Vodafone Group	367.4	15%	-	15.5
3	América Móvil Group	236.0	12%	-	7.7
4	Telefónica Group	227.3	47%	-	12.5
5	Bharti Airtel Group	221.2	25%	-	3.2
6	VimpelCom Group 2	191.9	115%	+8	4.6
7	China Unicom	181.6	16%	-1	4.0
8	Reliance Communications	143.3	29%	-1	1.0
9	Telenor Group	123.6	36%	+4	2.7
10	MTN Group	119.4	18%	-	3.5
11	Sistema Group 3	110.8	8%	-2	2.5
12	China Telecom	108.4	45%	+7	2.4
13	Verizon Wireless	106.3	7%	-2	14.7
14	Deutsche Telekom Group	105.9	-2%	-6	9.4
15	Telkomsel	102.3	16%	+1	1.4
16	AT&T	98.6	10%	-	14.2
17	Idea Cellular	95.1	38%	+5	1.0
18	BSNL	93.7	29%	+2	-
19	Tata DOCOMO (TTSL)	91.0	25%	+2	-
20	Telecom Italia Group	86.8	16%	-2	4.8

Mobile operator group global ranking by connections, Q2 2011
Source: Wireless Intelligence, company reports

U.S. Smart Phone Penetration Now 44%

Apple’s iPhone 4 was the leading mobile phone in the U.S., despite being a phone launched mid-way through 2010, according to Nielsen. 


Smart phone penetration rose from just 18 percent of mobile phone users in 2009 to  44 percent of U.S. residents in 2011.

Credit: Nielsen

Underdogs Tend to Innovate, Will T-Mobile USA Do So?

If Cole Brodman, Chief Marketing Officer, T-Mobile USA had his way, mobile service providers would not offer, or need to support, device subsidies. Most mobile executives probably would agree, as the growing wholesale cost of the latest smart phones has begun to impose a big penalty on operating income and profit margins.


Consumers obviously like paying $200 for devices that actually cost $500 to $600 each. But the device subsidies obviously represent a sort of inventory cost for the mobile service providers who are subsidizing the devices. 


T-Mobile USA would prefer to operate the way prepaid mobile service providers do, namely by eschewing subsidies. The downside for consumers is the potentially steep cost of their favored devices. 


Unlike the dominant mobile providers in the U.S. market, T-Mobile does support "bring your own device" plans, where consumers have financial incentives to forego the subsidies.


Underdogs tend to drive innovation in most markets, because they have to. The issue now is what else T-Mobile USA might be able to do in that regard 

Evolution of Social Media in 2012

Social media has come a long way over the last decade. Many forms now co-exist, and each medium seems to have a distinct function. It is irresistible to say the changes are long form to short form, and that is one of the trends. 


But the movement also is toward "sharing" more than "writing," and towards more visually-oriented sharing. There also has been a shift to sharing that has more commercial implications. 


2012 will likely see an acceleration of structured, push button, social curation across the web.  Why?  Because most users don't want to take much effort to produce content, and consuming content in a structured manner (especially photos) is also much faster. 


 

Apple iPad Still Leads, But Kindle Fire Gaining

Though a reasonable person would argue Android-powered devices will someday overtake the Apple iPad in sales volume at the moment it is the 7-inch Amazon tablet that is is the biggest competitor to the iPad, with 16.8 percent of the tablet market and 4.7 million units shipped during the fourth quarter of 2011, followed by Samsung with 5.8 percent of the market according to IDC.


But Apple still had “an increase of 110.5 percent from fourth quarter of 2010 levels.


 Apple also continued to lead the market with 54.7 percent of global market share despite being down from 61.5 percent in the quarter before. 


IDC expects Android to overtake iOS for global market share by 2015. Maybe the "tablet" market someday really will emerge from the "iPad" market. 

Source: IDC

Most Consumer Devices More Like iPods than PCs

Parks Associates says more than 60 percent of U.S. tablet owners use the device weekly to listen to music. That is just one more bit of evidence that tablets are "content consumption" devices.


In fact, both consumer and business content consumption patterns appear to be changing as tablet and e-reader ownership grow fast. In fact, one might argue that tablets and e-readers are being adopted faster than any other consumer electronics or communications products of all time.

The share of adults in the United States who own a tablet of some sort nearly doubled from 10 percent to 19 percent between mid-December 2011 and early January 2012. That’s a doubling of mass market adoption in just 30 days, from a significant base.

The ownership of e-readers also surged from 10 percent to 19 percent over the same time period. Tablet ownership doubled in two months

That is an unprecedented growth rate for any consumer electronics device. Tablet ownership also had been on a strong adoption path earlier in 2011 as well, but doubling in 30 days from a base of 10 percent seems never to have occurred before.

And it appears that strong adoption is occurring both in the consumer and business markets.
Fully 51 percent of IT decision-makers surveyed by IDG say they “always” use their iPad at work (and a further 40 percent say they sometimes use it at work), IDG reports after conducting a survey on tablet use for work. Tablet business use

Though iPads seem to be used for a variety of purposes, content consumption seems to be a dominant business application, though significant percentages of business users also say the tablet displaces some amount of smart phone use as well.

Web browsing, reading and news consumption are the top three usage contexts identified by professionals worldwide.

Whether tablet ownership “revives” the print newspaper and magazine market remains to be seen. But it already is pretty clear that tablets and e-readers are changing the function of “reading.”

The survey suggests that tablet computing is transforming patterns of content consumption. iPad-owning IT and business professionals are rapidly migrating away from newspapers and printed books, toward digital alternatives.

Nearly three quarters of iPad owners say that owning an iPad has reduced the frequency with which they purchase newspapers and books. Whether that helps or harms print content providers remains to be seen.

What is very clear, though, is that tablets and e-readers are being adopted faster than any other personal device, period.Historically, 10 percent adoption historically has been an inflection point: it is the point in an adoption process that represents critical mass, after which adoption accelerates.

You’ll have to click on this chart to view it in more detail, but it is one of the most useful bits of historical evidence you can use to estimate how long it might take an application, service or device to reach 10 percent penetration of U.S. households, for example.

There are some caveats. Not every innovation succeeds. This chart only shows you what happened with the most-popular consumer electronics services and products.

The point is that it can take quite a significant amount of time, between three and 10 years, for a successful and mass-adopted innovation to reach the crucial 10-percent-of-homes threshold, which seems to be the point at which any innovation really begins to accelerate, in terms of adoption.  Consumer adoption patterns

Tablets not only reached that level in a couple of years, they then exploded, doubling from 10 percent to nearly 20 percent, in literally 30 days. That is unheard of.

Also, it appears that Amazon might be winning its bet that if it sold Amazon Kindles almost at cost, it could grow content sales substantially.

RBC Capital analyst Ross Sandler polled 216 Kindle Fire owners and concluded that Kindle Fire tablets are making Amazon more money than was originally expected. Sandler originally had estimated that each Kindle Fire unit would generate about $136 in content purchases over the useful life of the device.Content purchases on Kindle Fire

But Sandler’s most-recent survey of 216 Kindle Fire owners suggests content revenue might be higher than that.

The survey found that roughly 80 percent of users already have purchased ebooks, with 58 percent of respondents buying more than three e-books within the first two months of owning the tablet.

Averaged out, that’s five e-books per quarter, which nets Amazon $15 per Fire owner per quarter, assuming an average selling price of $10 for ebooks. That further implies revenue from e-books of about $60 a year.

About 41 percent of Fire owners also say they have bought at least three apps. This will put another $9 per Fire owner per quarter into Amazon’s coffers, or $36 a year of net revenue (after splitting gross revenue with content owners).

That implies possible gross sales of about $30 a quarter worth of apps, assuming Amazon’s share of revenue is 30 percent.

Those figures suggest annual Kindle Fire revenue of about $96 a year. Over three years, that suggests $288 of revenue for Amazon, even if users do not buy any video or audio products, which seems unlikely.

What Should Apple Do With All its Cash?

Apple is the fastest growing company in the S&P 500. Also, given the size of the company and the pace of it's growth, the S&P 500 would have next to no earnings growth without it.


Many would say Apple also is one of the strongest company growth stories, ever. Of course, Apple also has $100 billion in free cash, and that pile seems to grow with each passing quarter. 


Naturally, there are growing questions about what Apple should do about that cash hoard. Some say Apple should start paying a dividend. Others would say that is the worst thing Apple could do. It is a growth company, not a "value" play. Those characteristics draw different kinds of investors. 


Some would argue Apple has to remain focused on growth. In an uncertain environment, that cash is vital, many would argue. And though Apple has no history of making large acquisitions, it always is possible that Apple eventually will find itself facing growth challenges that require significant cash.


Some of us might argue that content acquisition is one such example. Eventually, somebody will "crack the code" on video streaming, and disrupt the existing video entertainment business. But that is almost certainly going to require ownership, control or at least access to the key sources of programming that represent value for millions of potential customers. 


So far, no contestant with the ability and willingness to disrupt the business has had such access. And money is the key. To be sure, we have been hearing about "interactive," or "on-demand," or  Internet delivery of TV for decades. 


But that's the thing about really-big changes in a technology-based business. They often take time. And it is quite common for an important innovation to build very slowly at first, then reach an inflection point where change is more rapid than most expect, especially given the slow ramp up. 


Some might argue that Apple will need much of that cash to disrupt the TV business, even as it continues to insist it simply is a partner in that business. 

Apple Still Dominates Business Tablet Buying

A ChangeWave survey of 1600 business technology buyers in the United States found that  22 percent expected to be buying tablets during the second quarter of 2012, and 84 percent will be buying Apple iPads. 

Though one never knows what will happen in the future, some competitors might fear the worse, namely that Apple has once again created a hot new product category that it will "own," in terms of market share. 


Since November 2010, iPad share of buying intentions has hovered in the 77 percent to 80 percent range, according to ChangeWave.

Data source: ChangeWave Research

The adage that "there is no tablet market, only an iPad market" is no longer as true as it was a few years ago. But it still might be fair to say there is an iPad market, and then a tablet market. When one supplier has 70 percent market share, it is analogous to the MP3 player market, which wound up being an iPod market, with some other providers. 

In 2011, for example, Apple continued to hold 78 percent of the music player market. That is what "terrifies" other competitors. Apple has more than once showed an ability to dominate a new consumer electronics category. 

The mobile phone market is more complicated, as Apple does not compete in the feature phone category. In the smart phone category, Apple has about 30 percent share, globally. 

More tellingly, Apple seems to be, far and away, the most profitable smart phone manufacturer. Right now, one has to wonder whether Apple has done it again, creating a new category which it dominates.