The chances any single mobile app will get traction, becoming one of the 11 or 12 a smartphone user actually interacts with, are quite small, according to a new survey of about 7,000 consumers, conducted on behalf of Moosylvania,
In fact, just 10 of all the 100 apps male users say they interact with most have 46 percent of the usage. Just two apps have 27 percent share of all usage among the top-100 apps. The top-five apps have 39 percent of all the usage among the top-100 apps. It is terrifically difficult to break into the small circle of apps that even one percent of users, male or female, say they use regularly.
About half of consumers are using the mobile web as much as they’re using apps, so marketers should be very clear what they’re trying to achieve when deciding which approach to take, Moosylvania argues.
There is a clear Pareto distribution, commonly known as a "long tail," for apps. For male users, Google Maps is the most-used, by about 14 percent of male respondents. Facebook is second, at about 13 percent. App number ten, Yelp, is used by less than one percent of males.
Females, on the other hand, prefer Facebook quite a lot. Facebook is the top application used by 27 percent of female respondents. Google Maps is second at about seven percent. The 10th-most-used app by females, "calendar," is used by less than one percent of respondents.
The top-five mobile apps used by the female respondents represent 46 percent of all the top-100 apps females use. Just the top two apps represent 34 percent of all app use by females surveyed.
That highly-concentrated profile, plus the fact that 44 percent of all app users indicate that all or nearly all of their apps were free, suggests how difficult the "mobile app business" really is, as a business opportunity for app developers.
The study suggests females are more likely to have more free apps than men. About 52 percent of women indicated all or nearly all of their apps were free, versus 38 percent of males surveyed.
Males average approximately 31 apps on their smartphones and actively use about 12 of them. On average, females have about 26 apps on their phones and actively use about 11 of them.
There are 300,000 apps available that can be found on the majority of platforms, and out of those, a handful of apps completely dominate, leaving 299,900 fighting for an audience of any size, the study suggests.
You can see the full results at http://tracker.moosylvania.com.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Mobile App Usage is Highly Concentrated
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Clearwire Still Pursuing Spectrum Sale
Clearwire Corp still hopes to raise as much as $2 billion in new financing by selling excess wireless spectrum, according to its Erik Prusch, Clearwire CFO. That option would in many ways be less messy than possibly having T-Mobile USA join the ownership group.
Clearwire Corp. originally though it could raise as much as $2.5 billion $5 billion, so the current talk of "perhaps $2 billion" might suggest a bit less interest than earlier had been thought.
AT&T, Deutsche Telekom AG, Time Warner Cable and Sprint Nextel Corp. have been rumored to have some interest.
Clearwire earlier was said to be offering spectrum up to 40 Mhz of bandwidth per market. While an argument can be made for bids from any number of potential companies, T-Mobile USA is in some ways the most-motivated. It badly needs spectrum to support its own 4G efforts, has considered leasing capacity from LightSquared, and even if money were no object, would find daunting any other spectrum to buy in the near term, even though at some point other former TV broadcast spectrum should be made available for auction as well.
Time Warner Cable, for its part, could emerge from the process as the only U.S. cable company with its own, fully-owned national wireless footprint, were it to win the auction.
Sprint Nextel, if it actually is bidding, could be signaling it wants to distance itself from the Clearwire relationship, at least in part. Owning its own 4G spectrum would allow Sprint to better control both of its costs, its timetable for upgrades and deployments, as well as its ability to package services. Full control of its own spectrum would allow Sprint to move immediately to build a 4G network using the Long Term Evolution air interface, a move that will at some point allow Sprint Nextel to leverage production volume of LTE handsets and devices.
Verizon and AT&T historically have emerged from most spectrum auctions as key winners, and as the leaders in the U.S. market, arguably have the greatest strategic interest in protecting their lead, at least in part by locking up spectrum that could be used by a competitor. All of that suggests the chances of T-Mobile USA succeeding later, if it does not try to get the Clearwire spectrum, might not be so great.
Also, as the providers with the biggest customer bases, both Verizon and AT&T have the greatest need for more spectrum, and should already be considered front-runners for winning the re-purposed TV spectrum.
Clearwire Corp. originally though it could raise as much as $2.5 billion $5 billion, so the current talk of "perhaps $2 billion" might suggest a bit less interest than earlier had been thought.
AT&T, Deutsche Telekom AG, Time Warner Cable and Sprint Nextel Corp. have been rumored to have some interest.
Clearwire earlier was said to be offering spectrum up to 40 Mhz of bandwidth per market. While an argument can be made for bids from any number of potential companies, T-Mobile USA is in some ways the most-motivated. It badly needs spectrum to support its own 4G efforts, has considered leasing capacity from LightSquared, and even if money were no object, would find daunting any other spectrum to buy in the near term, even though at some point other former TV broadcast spectrum should be made available for auction as well.
Time Warner Cable, for its part, could emerge from the process as the only U.S. cable company with its own, fully-owned national wireless footprint, were it to win the auction.
Sprint Nextel, if it actually is bidding, could be signaling it wants to distance itself from the Clearwire relationship, at least in part. Owning its own 4G spectrum would allow Sprint to better control both of its costs, its timetable for upgrades and deployments, as well as its ability to package services. Full control of its own spectrum would allow Sprint to move immediately to build a 4G network using the Long Term Evolution air interface, a move that will at some point allow Sprint Nextel to leverage production volume of LTE handsets and devices.
Verizon and AT&T historically have emerged from most spectrum auctions as key winners, and as the leaders in the U.S. market, arguably have the greatest strategic interest in protecting their lead, at least in part by locking up spectrum that could be used by a competitor. All of that suggests the chances of T-Mobile USA succeeding later, if it does not try to get the Clearwire spectrum, might not be so great.
Also, as the providers with the biggest customer bases, both Verizon and AT&T have the greatest need for more spectrum, and should already be considered front-runners for winning the re-purposed TV spectrum.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Mobile Advertising Lead by Google, Apple, Millennial Media
Google and Apple currently are the two biggest mobile ad companies in the business, according to new estimates from IDC, but the market remains fragmented.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Online Video Will Change Lots of Things, Including Peering and Transit Pricing
Most observers who regularly follow such things have noted for some time that online video consumption is growing so fast that it will inevitably affect the way ISPs--wireless and wireline--price the use of access facilities. Bandwidth caps, higher fees and other changes to terms and conditions are conceivable.
But the new peering dispute between Level 3 Communications and Comcast also points out the coming changes in backbone interconnection agreements as well. Online video is extremely asymmetrical. Unlike voice or chat, where the volume of traffic is about equal in both directions, video is unbalanced in the downstream path.
That's why cable and satellite networks have been built the way they are, to favor delivery of lots of downstram bits, but few or much-fewer upstream bits. Broadcast TV and broadcast radio are other networks historically designed for media delivery, not two-way communications.
Broadband networks mostly have been designed around asymmetrical traffic flow.
Voice and similar radio networks, on the other hand, always have been designed around symmetrical traffic flow.
Asymmetrical bandwidth has not been a particular cost driver for media delivery networks. But asymmetrical traffic always drives carrier interconnection costs, pricing arbitrage, and revenue models in the communications business.
If one network imposes hugely unequal traffic load on another, the receiving network gets paid for that unequal use of facilities. But if video content gets as big as most observers think it will be, unbalanced traffic will occur on a scale never seen before. So will payments by "sending" networks to "receiving" networks.
That means higher costs for "sending" networks and higher revenue for "receiving" networks. To put matters another way, the historic value of access networks is about to be shown, and access network operators will get a revenue boost. If you think "carrier compensation" fights have been interminable before, just watch. Inter-carrier compensation is about to get more complicated than we've ever seen it.
But the new peering dispute between Level 3 Communications and Comcast also points out the coming changes in backbone interconnection agreements as well. Online video is extremely asymmetrical. Unlike voice or chat, where the volume of traffic is about equal in both directions, video is unbalanced in the downstream path.
That's why cable and satellite networks have been built the way they are, to favor delivery of lots of downstram bits, but few or much-fewer upstream bits. Broadcast TV and broadcast radio are other networks historically designed for media delivery, not two-way communications.
Broadband networks mostly have been designed around asymmetrical traffic flow.
Voice and similar radio networks, on the other hand, always have been designed around symmetrical traffic flow.
Asymmetrical bandwidth has not been a particular cost driver for media delivery networks. But asymmetrical traffic always drives carrier interconnection costs, pricing arbitrage, and revenue models in the communications business.
If one network imposes hugely unequal traffic load on another, the receiving network gets paid for that unequal use of facilities. But if video content gets as big as most observers think it will be, unbalanced traffic will occur on a scale never seen before. So will payments by "sending" networks to "receiving" networks.
That means higher costs for "sending" networks and higher revenue for "receiving" networks. To put matters another way, the historic value of access networks is about to be shown, and access network operators will get a revenue boost. If you think "carrier compensation" fights have been interminable before, just watch. Inter-carrier compensation is about to get more complicated than we've ever seen it.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Online Ad Spending Will Pass Newspapers by 2013
Magna Global predicts that worldwide, online ad spending will overtake newspapers in a little over two years. In 2011 the U.S. ad market is looking fairly weak—though positive, at least—while online is expected to rise 11.6 percent in the United States.
Worldwide ad expenditures will rise 5.4 percent in 2011, mostly thanks to the continuing growth in emerging markets and stabilization in developed markets.
TV advertising will command a 40 percent share of all ad dollars and gain 7.5 percent annually through 2016. But online advertising will overtake newspapers as the second largest ad spending category by 2013 by taking in $117 billion at that point.
Online video will capture $4.7 billion in global ad revenues, and should rise by 19.6 percent each year through 2016. By that point, online video will account for $11.4 billion in global ad spend.
Mobile advertising is smaller, at $2.7 billion, and will grow at a similar pace to online video. Within five years, web publishers should see about $6.6 billion from mobile advertising.
read more here
Worldwide ad expenditures will rise 5.4 percent in 2011, mostly thanks to the continuing growth in emerging markets and stabilization in developed markets.
TV advertising will command a 40 percent share of all ad dollars and gain 7.5 percent annually through 2016. But online advertising will overtake newspapers as the second largest ad spending category by 2013 by taking in $117 billion at that point.
Online video will capture $4.7 billion in global ad revenues, and should rise by 19.6 percent each year through 2016. By that point, online video will account for $11.4 billion in global ad spend.
Mobile advertising is smaller, at $2.7 billion, and will grow at a similar pace to online video. Within five years, web publishers should see about $6.6 billion from mobile advertising.
read more here
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Federal Reserve Predicts High Unemployment Through 2012
The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee recently updated its forecasts for 2011 and 2012, including higher than previously-forecast unemployment ranges.
The new central tendency (removing the highest and lowest forecasts to get a feel for the "median") for 2011 is 8.9 percent to 9.1 percent, compared to earlier projections of 8.3 percent to 8.7 percent. Using the midpoint of the ranges, the new forecast is a full half-percent higher than just five months earlier.
The 2012 numbers are even worse, with a new range of 7.7 percent to 8.2 percent, up from 7.1 percent to 7.5 percent, an increase of 0.65% from midpoint to midpoint.
By traditional and formal measures, we are in an economic recovery. But the stubbornly-high unemployment might suggest an extremely-unusual assessment of business risk and growth prospects, or some structural change in the economy, or both.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Verizon iPhone in 2011
According to a report to clients issued Monday by Kaufman Bros.' Shaw Wu, Apple got the terms it wanted from Verizon for the version of the iPhone expected to be released by the carrier in early 2011.
Wu writes that he is 'picking up that iPhone economics to Apple are likely to be favorable, similar to that offered by AT&T. That should mean an iPhone should not cost more when built for Verizon than for AT&T.
Wu writes that he is 'picking up that iPhone economics to Apple are likely to be favorable, similar to that offered by AT&T. That should mean an iPhone should not cost more when built for Verizon than for AT&T.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
DIY and Licensed GenAI Patterns Will Continue
As always with software, firms are going to opt for a mix of "do it yourself" owned technology and licensed third party offerings....
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...