Americans used more than 1.1 trillion megabytes (MB) of data from July 2011-June 2012, which was an increase of 104 percent over the previous 12 months according to CTIA - The Wireless Association.
The survey also revealed that smart phone adoption continues to grow impressively. As of June 2012, smart phones made up 131 million (or 41 percent) of the almost 322 million wireless subscriber connections.
The number of tablets increased to 22 million, which is almost 17 percent of all wireless connections. In addition, there was an almost 10 percent increase in prepaid subscribers, from 68.4 to 74.9 million or 23.3 percent of the 322 million U.S. wireless subscribers.
Friday, October 12, 2012
U.S. Mobile Customer Data Consumption Up 104%
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Rogers Launches "Suretap" Mobile Payments
Rogers is launching its "suretap" mobile payments service, using near field communications, using NFC-enabled Research in Motion devices (BlackBerry 9900 and 9360), using a “CIBC Mobile Payment" app. Perhaps only in Canada would the lead devices be Research in Motion handsets, not Androids.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Sprint Strategy Could Change if Acquired by Softbank
Sprint's positioning in the U.S. market could change if Softbank manages to acquire Sprint. Consider that Softbank has been known as a carrier with deep experience in "innovative" mobile services including mobile payments, content and the use of analytics to shape consumer experiences.
Japanese and South Korean carriers are considered global leaders in mobile payments and analytics, and Softbank undoubtedly would try to leverage its experience at Sprint. That could mean a bigger profile for Sprint in both mobile payments and mobile commerce, as well as mobile advertising.
Sprint and T-Mobile USA have had different strategies in recent years, but a Softbank change of ownership could shift the profile even more.
Sprint has been a bigger player in the wholesale market. T-Mobile USA has been a bigger player in the "value" segment of the market. Sprint has emphasized "simplicity" with a value twist.
In buying MetroPCS, T-Mobile USA has deepened its exposure to the prepaid segment of the market. It isn't clear whether Softbank would necessarily want to go that direction, as it might make more sense to move in the direction of "software and application innovation." To the extent that Sprint wants to participate in the value segment, it has subsidiary brands for that purpose.
Neither Sprint nor T-Mobile USA initially had access to the Apple iPhone, so neither carrier might have been said to be competing for the iPhone customer, arguably a "premium" segment of the market.
That changed recently when Sprint got rights to sell the iPhone. T-Mobile USA still hasn't gotten such rights. So the more logical direction for Sprint, in the event of a Softbank acquisition, would be in the direction of a premium positioning.
Japanese and South Korean carriers are considered global leaders in mobile payments and analytics, and Softbank undoubtedly would try to leverage its experience at Sprint. That could mean a bigger profile for Sprint in both mobile payments and mobile commerce, as well as mobile advertising.
Sprint and T-Mobile USA have had different strategies in recent years, but a Softbank change of ownership could shift the profile even more.
Sprint has been a bigger player in the wholesale market. T-Mobile USA has been a bigger player in the "value" segment of the market. Sprint has emphasized "simplicity" with a value twist.
In buying MetroPCS, T-Mobile USA has deepened its exposure to the prepaid segment of the market. It isn't clear whether Softbank would necessarily want to go that direction, as it might make more sense to move in the direction of "software and application innovation." To the extent that Sprint wants to participate in the value segment, it has subsidiary brands for that purpose.
Neither Sprint nor T-Mobile USA initially had access to the Apple iPhone, so neither carrier might have been said to be competing for the iPhone customer, arguably a "premium" segment of the market.
That changed recently when Sprint got rights to sell the iPhone. T-Mobile USA still hasn't gotten such rights. So the more logical direction for Sprint, in the event of a Softbank acquisition, would be in the direction of a premium positioning.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Global Voice Divide Has Closed, Broadband Divide is Closing, As Well
Without minimizing the issues involved, the concern about availability of advanced communication services in undeveloped regions is an “issue,” but not a “crisis.”
In other words, mobile broadband, fixed broadband and advanced voice and messaging services are not as prevalent in “developing” countries as in “developed” nations.
But the gaps rapidly are being addressed by mobile service providers, device manufacturers and application providers.
It wasn’t so long ago (three decades ago, for example) that policy makers seriously were perplexed about how to provide basic phone service to billions of humans who “had never made a phone call.”
These days, we have an answer. Mobile networks and services have largely erased that “voice access” problem, and the answer to broadband access will be “mobile networks” as well.
In fact, the global mobile access and mobile broadband “divide” is closing rapidly, one might conclude from the latest data from the International Telecommunications Union. The Measuring the Information Society 2012” report also shows that developing countries now account for lion’s share of mobile growth,
Indeed, in the mobile sector, developing countries now account for the lion’s share of market growth. Mobile subscriptions registered continuous double-digit growth in developing country markets, for a global total of six billion mobile subscriptions by end 2011. Both China and India each account for around one billion subscriptions.
Mobile broadband continues to be the service with the sharpest growth rates. Over the past year, growth in mobile-broadband services continued at 40 percent globally and 78 percent in developing countries.
In fact, there are now twice as many mobile broadband subscriptions as fixed broadband subscriptions worldwide. The price of ICT services also dropped by 30 percent between 2008 and 2011, the report finds. The biggest decrease in fixed- broadband Internet services, where average prices have come down by 75 percent. And the bulk of those changes have come in the “developing” regions and countries. That isn’t to say broadband is “affordable” in most developing areas. At the end of 2011, the price of a monthly fixed-broadband package represented over 40 percent of monthly gross national income per capita, the report indicates.
In developed nations, the retail price of broadband access amounted to about 1.7 percent of monthly gross national income per capita, in developed economies.
The ITU has set the targeted cost of an entry-level broadband subscription at less than five percent of GNI. And as has been the case for voice services, mobile services will provide the answer, for the most part.
By 2011, nine of the top 20 telecom markets globally in terms of revenues were developing country markets, including Brazil, China, India and Mexico, while developing countries collectively accounted for 35 percent of world telecommunication revenue.
In other words, mobile broadband, fixed broadband and advanced voice and messaging services are not as prevalent in “developing” countries as in “developed” nations.
But the gaps rapidly are being addressed by mobile service providers, device manufacturers and application providers.
It wasn’t so long ago (three decades ago, for example) that policy makers seriously were perplexed about how to provide basic phone service to billions of humans who “had never made a phone call.”
These days, we have an answer. Mobile networks and services have largely erased that “voice access” problem, and the answer to broadband access will be “mobile networks” as well.
In fact, the global mobile access and mobile broadband “divide” is closing rapidly, one might conclude from the latest data from the International Telecommunications Union. The Measuring the Information Society 2012” report also shows that developing countries now account for lion’s share of mobile growth,
Indeed, in the mobile sector, developing countries now account for the lion’s share of market growth. Mobile subscriptions registered continuous double-digit growth in developing country markets, for a global total of six billion mobile subscriptions by end 2011. Both China and India each account for around one billion subscriptions.
Mobile broadband continues to be the service with the sharpest growth rates. Over the past year, growth in mobile-broadband services continued at 40 percent globally and 78 percent in developing countries.
In fact, there are now twice as many mobile broadband subscriptions as fixed broadband subscriptions worldwide. The price of ICT services also dropped by 30 percent between 2008 and 2011, the report finds. The biggest decrease in fixed- broadband Internet services, where average prices have come down by 75 percent. And the bulk of those changes have come in the “developing” regions and countries. That isn’t to say broadband is “affordable” in most developing areas. At the end of 2011, the price of a monthly fixed-broadband package represented over 40 percent of monthly gross national income per capita, the report indicates.
In developed nations, the retail price of broadband access amounted to about 1.7 percent of monthly gross national income per capita, in developed economies.
The ITU has set the targeted cost of an entry-level broadband subscription at less than five percent of GNI. And as has been the case for voice services, mobile services will provide the answer, for the most part.
By 2011, nine of the top 20 telecom markets globally in terms of revenues were developing country markets, including Brazil, China, India and Mexico, while developing countries collectively accounted for 35 percent of world telecommunication revenue.
Top 20 telecommunication markets, by revenue, 2010
|
* |
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Smart Guys Disagree About Whether Internet Really Can Handle Voice Well
The "Internet" never was intended to be the "next generation network" for all communications, despite its apparent suitability for any number of communications tasks.
And though there is a clear and important distinction to be made between the "Internet" and private IP networks, some will dispute the long term efficacy of trying to provide isochronous "real time" services (voice, fast twitch gaming and video telephony, for example) using IP.
Martin Geddes and Dan York, for example, disagree about the ultimate suitability of IP-based networks for real time services, for reasons related to the very protocols themselves. York, for example, thinks newer protocols such as WebRTC will work just fine. Geddes disagrees.
The disagreement boils down to a fundamental difference of opinion on how well IP-based networks can be made to work. In a sense, it is a philosophical debate (with real world protocol implications) over how well real-time services can be made to work over networks that simply never were architected with "real time" services in mind.
Those of you with an engineering bent will understand this as a "class of service" issue, but also fundamentally a protocol and architecture issue as well. Those of you with some memories of past debates will recognize that the "connectionless" and "connection-oriented" approach to networking is a subject that has not fully gone away.
And though there is a clear and important distinction to be made between the "Internet" and private IP networks, some will dispute the long term efficacy of trying to provide isochronous "real time" services (voice, fast twitch gaming and video telephony, for example) using IP.
Martin Geddes and Dan York, for example, disagree about the ultimate suitability of IP-based networks for real time services, for reasons related to the very protocols themselves. York, for example, thinks newer protocols such as WebRTC will work just fine. Geddes disagrees.
The disagreement boils down to a fundamental difference of opinion on how well IP-based networks can be made to work. In a sense, it is a philosophical debate (with real world protocol implications) over how well real-time services can be made to work over networks that simply never were architected with "real time" services in mind.
Those of you with an engineering bent will understand this as a "class of service" issue, but also fundamentally a protocol and architecture issue as well. Those of you with some memories of past debates will recognize that the "connectionless" and "connection-oriented" approach to networking is a subject that has not fully gone away.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Smaller U.S. Telecom Firms Face Tough Revenue Growth Prospects
An analysis by Fitch Ratings will confirm what you might expect: smaller U.S. service providers are encountering problems generating organic revenue growth.
In large part, that is because sales of legacy products are slowing. That, in large part, also accounts for the recent merger and acquisition activity wtihin the U.S. cable TV business, Fitch Ratings says.
"Operators are faced with maturing product and service portfolios and unrelenting competitive pressures," Fitch Ratings notes. As always is the case, when organic growth becomes difficult, public companies will look out of region for acquisition targets, essentially substituting acquired customers and revenue for growth in the existing territories.
Fitch Ratings says such "grow by acquisition" strategies will be more important in the future. It's hard to disagree with that forecast.
In large part, that is because sales of legacy products are slowing. That, in large part, also accounts for the recent merger and acquisition activity wtihin the U.S. cable TV business, Fitch Ratings says.
"Operators are faced with maturing product and service portfolios and unrelenting competitive pressures," Fitch Ratings notes. As always is the case, when organic growth becomes difficult, public companies will look out of region for acquisition targets, essentially substituting acquired customers and revenue for growth in the existing territories.
Fitch Ratings says such "grow by acquisition" strategies will be more important in the future. It's hard to disagree with that forecast.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Softbank Purchase of Sprint Could Have Other Ramifications
A Softbank purchase of Sprint potentially could have further ramifications elsewhere in the U.S. markets beyond its obvious potential for change in the retail wireless space. Sprint, for example, does own a national long haul network that essentially has been harvested as a cash cow, without major investments of the sort a company might make if that assets were "core" and strategic, many would argue.
So speculation about what might be possible, in the wake of a successful Softbank bid for Sprint, naturally will occur. Some will argue the long haul asset could be sold. The issue then becomes "who would buy," and what would that mean?
Level 3 Communications has been an asset purchaser for quite some time, so Level 3 inevitably would be thought a potential acquirer. CenturyLink, which owns the former Qwest backbone, also would be viewed as a candidate, as CenturyLink also has been a buyer of assets.
In that event, CenturyLink could migrate customers off the older Sprint backbone and onto the former Qwest network. In addition to an arguably better value proposition for customers, CenturyLink would be able to leverage its own access footprint to lower costs.
And CenturyLink might also be able to secure wholesale access to the Sprint and Clearwire wireless assets on terms more favorable than what is currently possible.
So speculation about what might be possible, in the wake of a successful Softbank bid for Sprint, naturally will occur. Some will argue the long haul asset could be sold. The issue then becomes "who would buy," and what would that mean?
Level 3 Communications has been an asset purchaser for quite some time, so Level 3 inevitably would be thought a potential acquirer. CenturyLink, which owns the former Qwest backbone, also would be viewed as a candidate, as CenturyLink also has been a buyer of assets.
In that event, CenturyLink could migrate customers off the older Sprint backbone and onto the former Qwest network. In addition to an arguably better value proposition for customers, CenturyLink would be able to leverage its own access footprint to lower costs.
And CenturyLink might also be able to secure wholesale access to the Sprint and Clearwire wireless assets on terms more favorable than what is currently possible.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Directv-Dish Merger Fails
Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...