LS Networks to Build Rural Gigabit Networks in Pacific Northwest

LS Networks will deploy a high-density fiber-optic broadband network in 25 rural communities in Oregon and Washington over the next two years.

The program will offer simple broadband plans at 100 Mbps ($40 per month) or 1 Gbps speed costing $70 a month.

The $1.2 million “Connected Communities” project launched in Maupin, Oregon, in July, and the first services will begin in January 2017.

LS Networks is a competitive local exchange carrier that will leverage the backbone and access facilities it has built for business customers to be used for consumer Internet access. LS Networks has built more than 7,500 route miles of high-capacity fiber broadband in Oregon.

That approach might illustrate a continuing reality of the rural Internet access business, namely that it is difficult to supply high-quality services in isolated areas without revenues generated some other way.

Historically, service providers have used profits from business customer segments to support networks serving consumers; and profits from urban customers to support services for rural customers. LS Networks will use profits generated by its CLEC operations to build the rural consumer Internet access networks.

Peak-Hour Data Consumption Dominated by Video Entertainment, Globally

Peak hour data consumption in the Asia-Pacific region is driven by the use of real-time entertainment, representing 49.6 percent of total downstream traffic during peak period, and up from 47 percent in 2015.

Asia- Pacific’s traffic composition is for the most part similar to that of leading networks in Europe and North America. After streaming audio and video, web browsing and social networking round out the top-three traffic categories in the region.

In most regions around the world, real-time entertainment is the most dominant traffic category. That observation tends to correlate with use of 4G networks: as 4G usage rises, so does consumption of entertainment video.

Real-time entertainment in Africa now accounts for 18.1 percent of peak downstream traffic, an increase from 8.6 percent in 2015, according to Sandvine.

That is a result of wider availability of Long Term Evolution 4G networks, and use of smartphones, Sandvine suggests.

Web browsing accounts for 31.4 percent of downstream traffic in Africa.

WhatsApp now generates over seven percent of network traffic, while Viber represents 3.2 percent of traffic. Within 18 months, YouTube could become the lead application across Africa.

Across the Middle East, real-time entertainment is the leading source of traffic, accounting for over 37 percent of peak downstream traffic. Social networking accounts almost 20 percent of traffic in the region.

During evening hours. Facebook and web browsing are among the top three applications. an identical order to that observed on North American networks.

Internet Access: "We've Gotten the Easy Ones"

Lower-cost new networks, better business models and creating more usable spectrum to “connect everyone across South Asia and Southeast Asia to the Internet” were key themes at the Spectrum Futures conference held in Singapore, Oct 20 and 21, 2016.

Creating sustainable business models--as always--was a key focus.

“We have gotten the easy ones,” said Chris Weasler, Facebook director of global connectivity. So connecting the next couple few billion users will be challenging.

Speakers included communications regulators from Egypt on the west to Indonesia on the east; Internet service providers; app providers and enablers; venture capitalists; wholesale capacity partners; policy advocates and platform developers.

New ways of supplying and using spectrum; new models for deploying infrastructure and new ways to reduce the cost of Internet access facilities were discussed. New business models also were highlighted. “5G is completely different,” said Bob Horton, consultant.

Will huge new allocations of millimeter wave frequencies for 5G work? Simple answer, “yes,” said Reza Arefi, Intel director of spectrum strategy. Are infrastructure costs coming down? “By an order of magnitude,” said community networking specialist Jonathan Brewer.

Are regulator and industry expectations out of alignment? “Yes,” said Mohammed Shafi, Multinet Pakistan CEO. Is much more spectrum required? Without question, said Rajan Mathews, Cellular Operators Association of India director general.

Are there still big cultural gaps between service providers and app providers who can help access providers move up the value chain? Yes, said VC Dennis Wong, with Golden Gate Capital.

Telcos and app developers “speak a different (business) language,” said consultant Srinath V. So telcos should invest in app providers “as limited partners,” said Kenrick Drijkoningen, Golden Gate Ventures expert in residence.

Major work on business models also is necessary, argued James Sullivan, J.P. Morgan equities analyst.

“Even after accounting for Wi-Fi and new technologies and alternate business models, there will be still significant global wireless data demand that is not economically possible to serve,” said Sullivan. Simply, emerging markets “ don’t have nearly enough revenue opportunity to bridge the gap.”

Attendees learned about a number of initiatives, large and small, to bring lower cost Internet access efforts to bear, ranging from the Telecom Infra Project (TIP) to community-owned cellular.

TIP in an open source telecom platform effort presently supported by 300 organizations, ranging from tier-one mobile operators and equipment suppliers to Facebook itself. Few recognize that TIP wants to create open source access, backhaul, core network and management platforms.

Google’s Project Loon, using fleets of balloons to provide Internet access across rural areas, is working with all four Indonesian mobile operators and is awaiting approval from the finance ministry to proceed, said Leo Sugandi, Ministry of ICT, Indonesia.

Steve Song, Network Startup Resource Center associate, does not necessarily believe large national service providers are “required.” Villages and communities can be encouraged to create their own access networks, either mobile or Wi-Fi.

We“Solutions that blur the lines between licensed and unlicensed are possible and represent lower risk for regulators and operators,” Song said. “We need new models for spectrum access.”

Telekom Malaysia Ordered to Double Access Speeds, Cut Prices by 1/2 Over 2 Years

Telekom Malaysia Berhad (TMB) fixed network Internet access services--by order of the Malaysian government--must deliver a higher speed for the same price, starting in January 2017.

The objective is to double speeds and reduce prices  by half over the next two years.

"Lower prices and the potential for an increase in capital expenditure to support this plan are credit negative for TMB as they may pressure cash flows or raise debt levels in 2017," said Annalisa DiChiara, Moody VP. "At the same time, the financial implications for TMB in 2017 and beyond are unclear at this stage.”

TMB's adjusted debt/EBITDA was two times at June 2016 and the company expects capex/revenue of around 30 percent to 35 percent in 2016.

AT&T Might Already be Poised to Disrupt Video Markets

AT&T argues its acquisition of Time Warner will help it disrupt video markets. Even in advance of the proposed acquisition, AT&T appears to be doing so. DirecTV Now, the new steaming service, will offer 100 channels for $35 a month, a price point that is disruptive for the streaming video market.

In significant part, the price point seems to suggest one key advantage for over-the-top services, compared to traditional linear services. DirecTV Now will not require a technician visit, a dish installation or use of in-home customer premises equipment.

The truck roll along represents costs upwards of $100. The traditional install also requires the installation labor, hardware and then in-home decoders (one to several). It might not be unreasonable to suggest such costs represent $600 or more, in operations and capital investment, for each new install.

DirecTV Now will have none of those costs.

Google Fiber Head Departs, What Will Google Fiber Do?

There are at least a couple conclusions one might draw from new developments at Google Fiber. Some suggest Alphabet has given up on Google Fiber. Others argue, based on Google Fiber’s own statements and actions, that it instead is looking at business models that include  fixed wireless.

As Google Fiber has been saying, as it “paused” the extension of Google Fiber to new cities, the organization is looking at “new technology and deployment methods.”

It seems clear enough that actual uptake of Google Fiber was less than Google Fiber, and many other outside observers, expected to see. So given the cost of fiber to the home, a look at alternate access platforms would make sense, at a time when a number other leading entities, including AT&T and Verizon, plus Facebook, have signaled they are actively researching the use of such technologies.

It remains possible that even the new fixed wireless business models and deployment methods will not work to Google Fiber's satisfaction.

But it might be fair to suggest Google Fiber has learned one important lesson. In competitive local access markets, when market share can top out below 20 percent to 40 percent, the business model is extremely difficult, and might not often support three sustainable, facilities-based providers.

In the Cloud Era, All Plumbing is Commoditized

The idea of what we now call cloud computing is not new, with the concepts dating back more than a half century. But it was largely an idea, back then. Over the past 20 years we have moved faster, though.

Remember “application service providers?” Those turn-of-the-century efforts to supply remote versions of enterprise shrink-wrapped software mostly failed. Salesforce was the successful model. Amazon Web Services was the modern precursor, launched in 2002. So the cloud era--as a commercial reality--is less than two decades old.

Most consumers use cloud computing without knowing it, every time they use an Internet-delivered app. That is a key point: use of software and “applications” now is something users invoke from remote servers, not a bit of software locally resident on their appliances.

In parallel fashion, the move of computing resources “into the cloud” has had key implications for use of computing infrastructure by enterprises, government, schools, hospitals, smaller business and and consumers.

Less hardware is needed “on the premises.” More money is spent on services and access. Local area networks no longer are primarily about structured cabling and local servers, but Wi-Fi, for example.

To a large extent, that has meant hardware is commoditized. Local area networks now simply involve ensuring that Wi-Fi is available. “Computing” or “application access” now increasingly means enough bandwidth to reach the cloud-based app sources. All that means less capital is spent on local hardware and software; more on cloud-based replacements purchased as services.

In the telecommunications business, the implications have been vast, as well. Applications once created and sold by service providers have become--in large part--applications consumers or businesses can consume as cloud apps (Skype displaces voice; OTT messaging displaces SMS; Netflix replaces HBO or increasingly, linear video).

Cloud computing means more demand for bigger pipes. But the retail cost declines, either on a cost-per-bit basis or in absolute terms.

In other words, most computing infrastructure and communications has been, and will keep being, commoditized.

The fortunes of firms and the fate of industries will be shaped by that fundamental reality.