Thursday, August 27, 2015

Cricket Move Part of AT&T's Latin America Strategy

There is one easy way to describe the difference in business strategy conducted by AT&T and that chosen by Verizon Wireless. AT&T already is committed to expansion in Latin America, while Verizon remains focused on the U.S. market.

One example: Cricket Wireless, an AT&T value brand, is expanding international service  to nine new countries from the United States.

And that arguably is a relatively small part of the strategy. The most direct evidence are the acquisitions of Nextel Mexico and Iusacell, which make AT&T a direct competitor in the Mexico mobile business, and represent the first “outside the United States” expansion in nearly a decade.

The DirecTV acquisition also delivered AT&T a significant position in Latin America video entertainment, though some think additional expansion in the video area is less likely than investments in mobile assets.

Under the new Cricket plan, U.S. callers can reach Dominican Republic, Colombia, Costa Rica,El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, Jamaica, Haiti, or Nicaragua by adding the country of their choice to Cricket's Smart ($50) and Pro ($60) monthly plans.  

For an additional $10 - $15 per month, the add-ons give consumers a range of mobile-to-mobile and landline calling minutes (depending on the country) plus unlimited text, picture, and video messaging (MMS).

Local Firms Eager to Join Myanmar's 4th Mobile Operator Business

As you might expect, there is no shortage of local firms in Myanmar eager to participate in the creation of a fourth mobile service provider in a country that until recently had very low mobile adoption rates, and which is seeing rapid growth.

Some 17  local firms have applied to join a consortium that would operate Myanmar's fourth mobile phone network, said Chit Wai, deputy permanent secretary at the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology.

The firms selected to participate will be announced in September, with a mobile license running 15 years to be awarded to the consortium.

There is no limit on the number of local firms that can joining the consortium, which will include a foreign partner.

Currently, Norway's Telenor and Qatar's Ooredoo offer mobile service in Myanmar. A third telecom license is held by MPT, a joint venture between the telecoms ministry and Japan's KDDI.




Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Smartphone Sales Slow, But Focus Shifts to India

No market, the saying goes, grows to the sky. At some point, every market saturates, as most of the potential buyers actually have done so. That is starting to be the case for smartphone sales globally, even if pockets of potential growth remain.

Smartphone shipments are expected to grow 10.4 percent in 2015 to 1.44 billion units, according to International Data Corporation (IDC).

That forecast is revised lower from an earlier forecast of This is lower than IDC's previous forecast of 11.3 percent year-over-year growth in 2015.

IDC expects a noticeable slowdown in smartphone shipments in 2015 as China growth moderates.

As the largest market for smartphones--32 percent of all new smartphone shipments in 2014--China remains important even if its growth has begun to slow.

Shipments are forecast to grow just 1.2 percent year over year in 2015, which is down from 19.7 percent in 2014.

China will remain the largest market for smartphone volumes through 2019.

However, its share of the overall market is expected to drop to 23.1 percentin 2019 as high-growth markets like India continue to expand.

More than 26.5 million smartphones were shipped to India in the second quarter of 2015, up 44 per cent from 18.4 million units for the same period last year.

wwsmartphone.png


Worldwide Smartphone Forecast (units in millions)
Android
1,164.3
81.1%
9.9%
1,541.9
81.1%
5.0%
7.8%
iOS
223.7
15.6%
16.1%
269.6
14.2%
3.3%
7.0%
Windows Phone
36.9
2.6%
5.8%
67.8
3.6%
12.8%
14.2%
Others
11.5
0.8%
-15.5%
23.0
1.2%
8.6%
11.0%
TOTAL
1,436.5
100.0%
10.4%
1,902.3
100.0%
5.1%
7.9%

Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker

International Internet Capacity Grows 31% in 2015

Worldwide international Internet capacity growth rates are slowing, a rather familiar pattern in the international capacity business.

Growth rates were about 41 percent in 2011, and 31 percent in 2015. In part, the law of large numbers is at work: it is harder to maintain high growth rates as the installed base gets larger.

Backbone operators deployed 43 Tbps of new capacity in the past year, according to TeleGeography.

African Internet bandwidth grew 41 percent between 2014 and 2015, and 51 percent compounded annually over the last five years, to reach 2.9 Tbps.

Oceania saw the second fastest growth rate of 47 percent per year between 2011 and 2015 to reach 2.1 Tbps, and capacity in Latin America and the Middle East grew 44 percent per year to 20.6 Tbps and 8.4 Tbps, respectively, TeleGeography says.

While international Internet capacity in each of these regions has doubled every two years over the period, growth in Europe and the U.S. and Canada was far slower, at 33 percent compounded annually.

region-bw_normal.png
2011-2015 International Bandwidth Growth Rates
Source: TeleGeography

Verizon "Hum" Gets Carrier into Connected Car Aftermarket

After-market approaches to adding connected car features to vehicles are getting to be a crowded-or abundantly supplied--market. Add Verizon to that crowd, as it rolls out “Hum” branded devices and services.

The reasons are simple: it is a potentially huge market, representing anywhere between $4 billion and $500 billion in sales in 2015.

source: Symphony Teleca

Primary Reliance on Mobile Internet Access Grows in U.S. Market

Mobile Internet access is getting to be as important in the U.S. market as it is in many developing markets, as a primary, if not "the" primary way people get access to the Internet.

In 2014, the percentage of U.S. desktop-only internet users was 19.1 percent, while mobile-only users represented about 10.8 percent of Internet users.

In 2015, the share of mobile-only users has climbed to 11.3 percent, while the desktop-only population has declined to just 10.6 percent.

The vast majority of the digital population (78 percent) is multi-platform and goes online using both desktop and mobile platforms.

Still, the mobile-only user base is instructive. Even in the U.S. market, where fixed access and mobile access are relatively abundant, smartphones and tablets have become a primary method of Internet access.

That has implications for communications policy, not only the fortunes of Internet access, device suppliers, the consumer elecronics market and app providers.

In a similar way, mobile platforms accounted for 60 percent of the total time users spent interacting with digital media, up from 50 percent in 2014.

Also, mobile apps accounted for more than half of all digital media time spent in May 2015.

Those sorts of trends have other repercussions.

In a competitive market, one might well argue, the lowest cost provider among the contestants with significant market share, will win (some smaller contestants could well have even lower cost profiles, but no ability to scale).

And, as it has become undeniable that mobility continues to lead revenue growth and strategy in the broader market, what “cost leadership” looks like in the mobile space now is significant.

Without any question, Wi-Fi has become a core and foundational part of the access fabric for mobile devices and customers. “Ownership,” as such, is less important than “access.”

That roughly mirrors the structure of the Internet Protocol-based communications and application markets, where an app provider does not have to “own access assets,” but simply can use “any available access.”

So mobile service providers can “use” Wi-Fi assets without owning them. That directly affects thinking about investments in access assets. As it turns out, it is less expensive to rely on Wi-Fi for much, if not the majority, of “mobile” access operations.

In other words, encouraging users to go “untethered” on Wi-Fi benefits both users and carriers, as demand is shifted off the core mobile networks. That much is obvious.

Also obvious is that fixed network providers with dense backhaul networks stand to reap benefits as suppliers of small cell (mobile or Wi-Fi hotspots) networks, either for internal use or as a revenue-generating wholesale opportunity.

Just as obviously, any “mobile” service provider able to leverage such assets can change the cost structure of “mobility” services.

And that is precisely the opportunity cable TV operators believe they can seize. In other words, eventually, cable TV operators could emerge as the low cost providers in the mobile market, with implications for market share and leadership.


Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Australia Mandates Lower Mobile Termination Rates for Voice, Text Messages

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has mandated a change in wholesale mobile network termination charges.

For the first time, the ACCC has also decided on a price for mobile network operators to charge to receive SMS messages.

The ACCC has decided that the wholesale price of terminating calls on an Australian mobile network should be 1.7 cents per minute, reduced from the current rate of 3.6 cents per minute.

For the first time, the ACCC has decided to set the price mobile network operators charge to receive SMS messages at 0.03 cents per SMS.

With the important caveat that “cost” is not “retail price,” a study by WIK-Consult estimated the cost of termination for a mobile minute of use at about AU$0.0168, while the cost of terminating a text message was AU$0.00002.  

The rulings are important because, in addition to competition and changes in end user demand, government rules also are pushing down voice and text messaging rates. That, in turn, will lead to lower voice and text messaging revenue for mobile operators

The regulated prices for mobile voice and SMS termination will apply from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2019.

Mobile voice termination rates in the United Kingdom and Portugal, for example, are projected to decline steadily between 2015 and 2020, WIK-Consult said.

Directv-Dish Merger Fails

Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...