Thursday, September 19, 2024

Carbon and Water Footprint Always is a Trade Off

It is common these days--and rightly so--to evaluate the carbon or water impact of data centers used to support artificial intelligence operations. 


It also is fair to note that every action and every product has a carbon and water impact as well, as difficult as it might be to quantify the actual footprint of each product, including all the various component parts and processes that are used to create each individual product. 


Product

Water Footprint (Liters)

Explanation

Email (sent and received)

0.04

Primarily due to the energy required to power data centers.

Blog Post (created and viewed)

0.12

Similar to email, but with slightly higher energy consumption due to the creation and storage of content.

E-commerce Transaction

0.2

Includes the energy for processing payments, shipping, and product manufacturing.

Generative AI Query

0.30 - 1.00

Depends on the complexity of the query and the size of the AI model. Larger models and more complex queries require more energy and, consequently, more water.

Shirt (cotton)

2,700

Includes water used for cotton cultivation, processing, and manufacturing.

Pair of Shoes (leather)

1,000

Primarily due to the water used in cattle ranching and leather production.

Grocery Store Tomato

180

Depends on cultivation methods, but typically includes irrigation water.

Can of Beans

150

Water used for bean cultivation, processing, and packaging.

Auto (mid-size)

100,000

Includes water used in the production of materials, components, and fuel.

Toothbrush (plastic)

50

Water used in the production of plastic and packaging.

Restaurant Hamburger

2,400

Includes water used for beef production, vegetable cultivation, and food processing.


The point is that sustainability concerns exist for every physical or digital product you can imagine. We can, and should, always try to do better. But some footprint--carbon or water--is to be expected. It is a trade off.


Product

Carbon Footprint (Grams of CO2 equivalent)

Explanation

Shirt (cotton)

27,000

Includes carbon emissions from cotton cultivation, processing, and manufacturing.

Pair of Shoes (leather)

10,000

Primarily due to carbon emissions from cattle ranching and leather production.

Grocery Store Tomato

1,800

Depends on cultivation methods, but typically includes emissions from fertilizers and transportation.

Can of Beans

1,500

Carbon emissions from bean cultivation, processing, and packaging.

Auto (mid-size)

100,000

Includes carbon emissions from fuel combustion, material production, and transportation.

Toothbrush (plastic)

500

Carbon emissions from plastic production and packaging.

Restaurant Hamburger

24,000

Includes carbon emissions from beef production, vegetable cultivation, and food processing.

Email (sent and received)

4

Primarily due to the energy required to power data centers.

Blog Post (created and viewed)

12

Similar to email, but with slightly higher energy consumption due to the creation and storage of content.

E-commerce Transaction

20

Includes the energy for processing payments, shipping, and product manufacturing.

Generative AI Query

30 - 100

Depends on the complexity of the query and the size of the AI model. Larger models and more complex queries require more energy and, consequently, more carbon emissions.


The point is the need to make prudent trade offs, balancing the benefits and costs of AI, or computing, or data ceners against some amount of carbon and water consumption. We have to do likewise in all other phases of life and business. 


No comments:

Which Firm Will Use AI to Boost Revenue by an Order of Magnitude?

Ultimately, there is really only one way for huge AI infrastructure investments up by an order of magnitude over cloud computing investment ...