Thursday, March 20, 2025

"AI Edge Computing" is Multiple Markets, Not One

AI edge computing refers to the deployment of artificial intelligence algorithms at the "edge" of a network, closer to where data is generated, rather than relying solely on centralized cloud infrastructure. 


But there is a huge difference between “on-device” and “at a remote site” implementations, value chains and markets. 


For example,, on-device edge AI is about smartphones, IoT sensors, wearables or autonomous vehicles. 


Remote edge AI is about data centers, cloud computing, servers and other “enterprise” or “business” computing functions. 


Lumping everything together in one big “AI edge computing” category obscures as much as it illuminates. 


Category

Metric

On-Device Edge AI

Remote Edge AI

Source/Assumption

Market Size (2025)

Financial (USD Billion)

$15 billion

$10 billion

Based on edge AI market growth (e.g., Grand View Research, 21.7% CAGR from $20.78B in 2024)

Market Size (2030)

Financial (USD Billion)

$50 billion

$35 billion

Extrapolated from "device" and "data center" forecasts

Usage (2025)

Devices/Deployments

20 billion devices (smartphones, wearables)

500,000 edge nodes (e.g., servers, gateways)

Statista IoT, IDC edge spending forecasts

Compute Cycles (2025)

Avg. Cycles per Task

10^6 cycles (lightweight models, e.g., NLP)

10^9 cycles (complex models, e.g., video analytics)

Hardware capability estimates

Financial Implication

Revenue Driver

Hardware sales (AI chips, $500 billion smartphone market)

Infrastructure and services , perhaps $450 billion per year

On-device chips, smartphones for "on-device" mkt., connectivity and servers for "remote"

Growth Rate (2025-2030)

CAGR

27%

23%

Higher consumer device adoption vs. enterprise


As you can see, “edge AI” markets are largely contained within other existing device and data center markets. Looking at chip content alone, in either edge device or data center markets is helpful, but doesn’t show the full value chain for either type of product.


No comments:

Good Outcomes Beat Good Intentions: How Dumb Are We?

Good intentions clearly are not enough when designing policies to improve home broadband availability in underserved areas. In fact, since 2...