On the surface, given the role that worker compensation plays for just about any business, it might seem obvious that a robotaxi business would have higher profit margins than ride sharing, at scale. It probably is closer to a “tie” than most of us likely believe, for the medium term.
Driver compensation for rideshare firms seems to be in the 70 percent to 75 percent range, so the attraction of a robotaxi for a service provider is obvious.
But there are other issues, such as the possibility that, for a time, robotaxi fares could be as much as 50 percent lower than for a traditional rideshare. That should equalize over time, assuming the market comes to value both services equally.
The comparison obviously is different if robotaxi fares are higher than ride sharing.
Element | Traditional Ride-Hailing (Uber/Lyft) | Robotaxi (Autonomous) |
Revenue per Mile | $2.50–$3.50 (average US market) 11 | $1.00–$1.50 (targeted, but can be higher) 2 1 10 |
Main Revenue Source | Passenger fare (per ride/mile) | Passenger fare (per ride/mile), plus potential for in-car ads, data sales, B2B deals, and subscriptions 9 |
Key Costs |
|
|
Driver Compensation | 70–75% of fare (largest cost) 9 | $0 (no driver) 9,2 |
Vehicle Depreciation | 10–15% 9 | 20–25% (higher utilization, rapid wear) 1, 9 |
Fuel/Energy | 5–10% (gas or EV charging) 9 | 10–15% (electricity, higher utilization) 1, 9 |
Platform/Tech Fees | 20–30% taken by platform 3 | 15–20% (tech stack, remote ops, platform)9, 3 |
Insurance & Regulatory | 5–10% 9 | 5–10% (may be higher due to AV liability) 9,3 |
Maintenance | 5–10% 9 | 5–10% (higher miles/year, but fewer accidents )1,9 |
Profit Margin | 5–7% per ride 9 | 10–15% per ride 9,2 |
Example Ride (5 miles) |
|
|
Fare Charged | $15 | $7.50 |
Total Costs | ~$14 (driver: $10.50, other: $3.50) | ~$6.60 (vehicle: $1.25, energy: $0.45, ops: $1.13, other: $3.77) 1, 9 |
Profit per Ride | ~$1 (5–7%) | ~$0.90–$1.13 (12–15%) |
For example, there is some evidence that robotaxi fares have been higher than charged by ride sharing services, in some markets, at some times. So in some cases, ride sharing might actually then have a negative profit margin for some rides in off-peak hours.
That data is probably skewed by the willingness of early adopters to pay more. It remains to be seen whether most customers will do so, over the longer term.
Element | Traditional Ride-Hailing (Uber/Lyft) | Robotaxi (Autonomous) with 35% Higher Fare |
Fare per Mile | $3.00 (average) | $4.05 (35% higher than $3.00) |
Fare for 5-mile Ride | $15.00 | $20.25 |
Main Revenue Source | Passenger fare | Passenger fare, plus potential ancillary revenues |
Key Costs |
|
|
Driver Compensation | ~$10.50 (70% of fare) | $0 (no driver) |
Vehicle Depreciation | ~$2.25 (15% of fare) | ~$5.06 (higher utilization and AV tech costs) |
Fuel/Energy | ~$1.05 (7% of fare) | ~$1.35 (higher utilization, mostly electric) |
Platform/Tech Fees | ~$3.00 (20% of fare) | ~$4.05 (20% of fare, includes AV tech & ops) |
Insurance & Regulatory | ~$1.05 (7% of fare) | ~$1.35 (higher liability and regulatory costs) |
Maintenance | ~$1.05 (7% of fare) | ~$1.35 (higher miles but fewer accidents) |
Total Costs | ~$18.90 | ~$13.16 |
Profit per Ride | ~$15 - $18.90 = -$3.90 (loss or break-even*) | ~$20.25 - $13.16 = $7.09 |
Profit Margin | Negative or very low (approx. -26%) | ~35% profit margin |
Whenever forecasts are made in complex systems, the results are highly dependent, in later years, on the initial assumptions.That often is known as the "butterfly effect," a concept in chaos theory that describes how a small change in initial conditions can lead to vastly different outcomes in a complex system.
The butterfly effect highlights the limitations of predictability in complex systems and suggests that it may be impossible to accurately predict long-term outcomes, as small changes in initial conditions will be magnified over time.
Autonomous vehicles used to support robotaxi service might not qualify, in a strict sense, as such highly-complex systems. Still, the variances in outcomes based on different assumptions about costs and revenues illustrate the principle.
No comments:
Post a Comment