Most of us instinctively assume that “happy” workers must be more productive, and while that can be true, it might often be the case that even happy workers are not necessarily more productive.
Happiness seems to matter more for some jobs than others, especially knowledge work, creative work, sales, and customer-facing roles.
But there are lots of other issues, ranging from poor management to misaligned goals, skills or incentives.
Many workplace studies suffer from a classic problem: are people productive because they are happy, or happy because they are productive? In other words, is there a causal relationship, and, if so, in what direction?
Several mechanisms appear repeatedly in the literature, but they do not all have to do with “happiness.”
These effects tend to matter most where human judgment is important, in a few situations:
Knowledge Work (Engineers, consultants, researchers, designers, analysts, and software developers appear particularly sensitive to emotional state because productivity depends heavily on cognition and creativity. (arXiv
Sales and customer service (Positive moods can improve interactions with customers, influencing sales and retention, as the experience is, in many ways, the product)
Team-Based Work (engagement and morale can affect coordination and cooperation (Gallup.com).
So even if good advice is to attempt to creation environments where workers are happy, there are lots of other input variables, where the goal is higher productivity.
But “productivity” is not directly produced by:
friendly culture
generous benefits
satisfied employees.
Many startups, investment banks, law firms, and military organizations have historically produced high output despite significant stress and only moderate happiness.
Likewise, some comfortable organizations generate little value.
The evidence suggests that engagement is often a better predictor than simple happiness.
If “happiness” is "I feel good," then engagement is "I care about this work."
An employee can be:
happy but disengaged
engaged but stressed
both engaged and happy.
Research generally finds that engagement is more closely tied to organizational performance than simple job satisfaction, according to Gallup.com.
So the causal chain is not so much “happy workers are productive workers,” but something more like “competent workers, meaningful work, supportive management and positive well-being lead to higher productivity.
An interesting economic observation is that happiness often functions less like a direct production input and more like a multiplier on human capital.
For example:
Happy workers are more likely to be productive, especially in knowledge-intensive jobs, but productivity depends on a broader combination of skills, incentives, engagement, management quality, and organizational design. Happiness helps, but it is not sufficient by itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment