"What happens when every mobile user has an iPhone, a Palm Pre, a Blackberry Tour or whatever the next device is?" asks Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski."What happens when we quadruple the number of subscribers with mobile broadband on their laptops or netbooks?"
"The short answer: we will need a lot more spectrum," he says. So look for the FCC to explore ways to promote spectrum efficiency and use of Wi-Fi, for example.
"Wi-Fi allows carriers to offload to fixed broadband as much as 40 percent of traffic in the home, freeing up capacity of licensed spectrum," he says.
But even efficiency measures do not alleviate the need for more spectrum. So the FCC chairman says he will work on reallocating spectrum currently being used for other purposes.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
FCC Chair Promises More Mobile Spectrum
Labels:
broadband,
business model,
mobile
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
U.S. Wireless Data Hits New High
Wireless data service revenues climbed to more than $19.4 billion for the first half of 2009, CTIA-The Wireless Association says. This represents a 31 percent increase over the first half of 2008. In addition, wireless data revenues were more than 25 percent of all wireless service revenues.
The survey also found that more than 246 million data-capable devices are in use, while more than 40 million of these devices are Ssmartphones or wireless-enabled PDAs. More than 10 million are wireless-enabled laptops, notebooks or aircards.
More than 740 billion text messages carried on carriers’ networks during the first half of 2009, roughly 4.1 billion messages per day. That’s nearly double the number from last year, when only 385 billion text messages were reported for the first half of 2008.
Wireless subscribers are also sending more pictures and other multi-media messages with their mobile devices—more than 10.3 billion MMS messages were reported for the first half of 2009, up from 4.7 billion in mid-year 2008.
As of June 2009, the industry survey recorded more than 276 million wireless users. This represents a year-over-year increase of nearly 14 million subscribers.
Wireless customers used more than 1.1 trillion minutes in the first half of 2009—breaking down to 6.4 billion minutes-of-use per day—and six-month wireless service revenues of nearly $76 billion.
The survey also found that more than 246 million data-capable devices are in use, while more than 40 million of these devices are Ssmartphones or wireless-enabled PDAs. More than 10 million are wireless-enabled laptops, notebooks or aircards.
More than 740 billion text messages carried on carriers’ networks during the first half of 2009, roughly 4.1 billion messages per day. That’s nearly double the number from last year, when only 385 billion text messages were reported for the first half of 2008.
Wireless subscribers are also sending more pictures and other multi-media messages with their mobile devices—more than 10.3 billion MMS messages were reported for the first half of 2009, up from 4.7 billion in mid-year 2008.
As of June 2009, the industry survey recorded more than 276 million wireless users. This represents a year-over-year increase of nearly 14 million subscribers.
Wireless customers used more than 1.1 trillion minutes in the first half of 2009—breaking down to 6.4 billion minutes-of-use per day—and six-month wireless service revenues of nearly $76 billion.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Study Finds Consumers Do Not Want Targeted Ads
“Contrary to what many marketers claim, most adult Americans (66 percent) do not want marketers to tailor advertisements to their interests, s new study from the Annenberg School for Communication, University of California Berkeley School of Law and the Annenberg Public Policy Center suggests.
“Moreover, when Americans are informed of three common ways that marketers gather data about people in order to tailor ads, even higher percentages— between 73 percent and 86 percent—say they would not want such advertising,” the Annenberg study says.
Respondents showed somewhat more interest in receiving personalized discounts and news, but still, less than one-half of Americans wanted any tailored Web content at all.
That was true of consumers in every age group—even young adults ages 18 to 24 were more likely to say no to behavioral targeting than to accept it, except for discounts.
More than two thirds of respondents to the Annenberg/Berkeley study felt they had lost control over their personal information. At the same time, however, they believed businesses handled their data well and that they were already protected by current regulations.
One suspects the responses might be different if consumers are asked whether they would be willing to receive tailored messages in exchange for some other tangible benefit, such as lower Internet access costs, free text or lower-cost voice, discounts or other tangible benefits.
The precedent is TV commercials. Just about everybody says they do not like commercials. But if asked whether they would rather watch TV without commercials, if the cost were higher, most people then say they will choose an ad-supported service.
“Moreover, when Americans are informed of three common ways that marketers gather data about people in order to tailor ads, even higher percentages— between 73 percent and 86 percent—say they would not want such advertising,” the Annenberg study says.
Respondents showed somewhat more interest in receiving personalized discounts and news, but still, less than one-half of Americans wanted any tailored Web content at all.
That was true of consumers in every age group—even young adults ages 18 to 24 were more likely to say no to behavioral targeting than to accept it, except for discounts.
More than two thirds of respondents to the Annenberg/Berkeley study felt they had lost control over their personal information. At the same time, however, they believed businesses handled their data well and that they were already protected by current regulations.
One suspects the responses might be different if consumers are asked whether they would be willing to receive tailored messages in exchange for some other tangible benefit, such as lower Internet access costs, free text or lower-cost voice, discounts or other tangible benefits.
The precedent is TV commercials. Just about everybody says they do not like commercials. But if asked whether they would rather watch TV without commercials, if the cost were higher, most people then say they will choose an ad-supported service.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Monday, October 5, 2009
New AT&T Mobile Browser
AT&T has developed its own mobile browser, providing customers three windows to the Web. From the homepage, users can easily browse the global Internet as well as assign bookmarks and shortcuts or set other preferences so they have quick access to their favorite content.
A second window gives users location-aware local news and weather; one-click results for nearby restaurants, nightlife venues, ATMs and other points of interest; and access to maps, driving directions and traffic information.
A third window delivers the latest headlines from popular news, sports and entertainment sites.
Additionally, customers accessing att.net from their PC can customize their mobile att.net page by sending shortcuts to popular Web sites through a "Send to Mobile" feature.
"The new browser powering the att.net service brings the best of the open Web to consumer feature phones while making the mainstay of the mobile Web easy to find and also delivering local tools and bookmarking management," says Ted Woodbery, vice president of Wireless Data, Voice and Ancillary Products for AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets.
The custom browser suggests one way service providers can optimize mobile Web experiences for users by making navigation easier. AT&T also is introducing new phones late this fall, including the Samsung "Flight," which features both a touchscreen and a QWERTY keypad.
A second window gives users location-aware local news and weather; one-click results for nearby restaurants, nightlife venues, ATMs and other points of interest; and access to maps, driving directions and traffic information.
A third window delivers the latest headlines from popular news, sports and entertainment sites.
Additionally, customers accessing att.net from their PC can customize their mobile att.net page by sending shortcuts to popular Web sites through a "Send to Mobile" feature.
"The new browser powering the att.net service brings the best of the open Web to consumer feature phones while making the mainstay of the mobile Web easy to find and also delivering local tools and bookmarking management," says Ted Woodbery, vice president of Wireless Data, Voice and Ancillary Products for AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets.
The custom browser suggests one way service providers can optimize mobile Web experiences for users by making navigation easier. AT&T also is introducing new phones late this fall, including the Samsung "Flight," which features both a touchscreen and a QWERTY keypad.
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Does Net Neutrality Posse Credit Risk for U.S. Wireless Providers?
While there is still uncertainty around potential new rules regarding net neutrality and its impact on wireless operators, Fitch Ratings does not believe potential regulatory changes will materially affect the credit profiles of wireless companies over the longer term.
Fitch does believe the controversial plans outlined by the FCC chairman could face process delays and potential legal challenges once there is clarity about the proposed rules. In other words, there will be no clarity for some time after promulgation of new rules.
In Fitch's opinion, the competitive environment would have likely dictated that the wireless industry naturally evolve in this direction but the conditions and rules currently contemplated by the FCC will likely accelerate the pace at which this transition occurs and place more definitive regulatory restrictions on wireless operators.
Consequently, carriers will likely need to adapt access plans to mitigate the impact that devices with more data intensive applications could have on network quality.
Since nearly all markets experience lower demand when prices are raised, it is likely that access pricing will evolve in ways that generally match consumption to usage, though that does not have to take the form of strict metering of usage, but more likely will take the form of buckets of use, one would suspect.
Fitch also believes that 4G networks offer the potential to generate additional revenue from several new sources like machine-to-machine applications which could more than offset pressure from further erosion of voice related average revenue per user.
From a credit perspective, Fitch believes the dominant market share, higher margins, strong free cash flow, and robust spectrum portfolios of Verizon Wireless and AT&T Wireless strongly position the companies to capture additional share and future market growth opportunities, at least partially offsetting structural changes that could pressure certain revenue and cash flow streams.
However, the market strength of Verizon and AT&T has implications for the remaining national, regional and niche wireless operators, which will likely face increasing credit risk as the wireless industry evolves to 4G and the competitive market intensifies for certain products and services.
Fitch does believe the controversial plans outlined by the FCC chairman could face process delays and potential legal challenges once there is clarity about the proposed rules. In other words, there will be no clarity for some time after promulgation of new rules.
In Fitch's opinion, the competitive environment would have likely dictated that the wireless industry naturally evolve in this direction but the conditions and rules currently contemplated by the FCC will likely accelerate the pace at which this transition occurs and place more definitive regulatory restrictions on wireless operators.
Consequently, carriers will likely need to adapt access plans to mitigate the impact that devices with more data intensive applications could have on network quality.
Since nearly all markets experience lower demand when prices are raised, it is likely that access pricing will evolve in ways that generally match consumption to usage, though that does not have to take the form of strict metering of usage, but more likely will take the form of buckets of use, one would suspect.
Fitch also believes that 4G networks offer the potential to generate additional revenue from several new sources like machine-to-machine applications which could more than offset pressure from further erosion of voice related average revenue per user.
From a credit perspective, Fitch believes the dominant market share, higher margins, strong free cash flow, and robust spectrum portfolios of Verizon Wireless and AT&T Wireless strongly position the companies to capture additional share and future market growth opportunities, at least partially offsetting structural changes that could pressure certain revenue and cash flow streams.
However, the market strength of Verizon and AT&T has implications for the remaining national, regional and niche wireless operators, which will likely face increasing credit risk as the wireless industry evolves to 4G and the competitive market intensifies for certain products and services.
Labels:
broadband,
business model,
network neutrality,
wireless
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Net Neutrality Structurally Flawed, Entropy Economics Says
Network neutrality has deep structural flaws, says Bret Swanson, Entropy Economics president.
Though aiming to ensure equal treatment of applications on the best-effort Internet, network neutrality would ban packet prioritization that might actually benefit consumers, denying them the ability to voluntarily buy services that ensure best performance for voice and video, or any other applications they may deem equally important.
Network neutrality as envisioned by the Federal Communications Commission also would prohibit creation and offering of new differentiated services, he argues.
The FCC seems to argue that although the Internet and the Web have been wild successes, the market cannot be counted on to take the Internet to the next level, Swanson argues.
"The events of the last half-decade prove otherwise," he says. Since 2004, bandwidth per capita in the U.S. grew to three megabits per second from just 262 kilobits per second, and monthly Internet traffic increased to two billion gigabytes from 170 million gigabytes—both tenfold leaps.
The FCC's desire to extend wireline rules to wireless likewise is dangerous, he argues. No sector has boomed more than wireless, yet the FCC wants to extend new regulations to the technically complicated and bandwidth-constrained realm of wireless, he argues.
Wireless carriers invested $100 billion in just the past three years, and the United States vaulted past Europe in fast 3G mobile networks while Americans enjoy mobile voice prices 60 percent cheaper than foreign peers, he argues.
The danger is that heavy-handed new rules will stifle needed investment in new networks.
"My research suggests that U.S. Internet traffic will continue to rise 50 percent annually through 2015, and hundreds of billions of dollars in fiber optics, data centers, and fourth-generation mobile networks will be needed," Swanson says. "But if network service providers can't design their own networks, offer creative services, or make fair business transactions with vendors, will they invest these massive sums to meet, and drive, demand?"
"If you don't build it, they can't come," he says. And that is the danger.
Though aiming to ensure equal treatment of applications on the best-effort Internet, network neutrality would ban packet prioritization that might actually benefit consumers, denying them the ability to voluntarily buy services that ensure best performance for voice and video, or any other applications they may deem equally important.
Network neutrality as envisioned by the Federal Communications Commission also would prohibit creation and offering of new differentiated services, he argues.
The FCC seems to argue that although the Internet and the Web have been wild successes, the market cannot be counted on to take the Internet to the next level, Swanson argues.
"The events of the last half-decade prove otherwise," he says. Since 2004, bandwidth per capita in the U.S. grew to three megabits per second from just 262 kilobits per second, and monthly Internet traffic increased to two billion gigabytes from 170 million gigabytes—both tenfold leaps.
The FCC's desire to extend wireline rules to wireless likewise is dangerous, he argues. No sector has boomed more than wireless, yet the FCC wants to extend new regulations to the technically complicated and bandwidth-constrained realm of wireless, he argues.
Wireless carriers invested $100 billion in just the past three years, and the United States vaulted past Europe in fast 3G mobile networks while Americans enjoy mobile voice prices 60 percent cheaper than foreign peers, he argues.
The danger is that heavy-handed new rules will stifle needed investment in new networks.
"My research suggests that U.S. Internet traffic will continue to rise 50 percent annually through 2015, and hundreds of billions of dollars in fiber optics, data centers, and fourth-generation mobile networks will be needed," Swanson says. "But if network service providers can't design their own networks, offer creative services, or make fair business transactions with vendors, will they invest these massive sums to meet, and drive, demand?"
"If you don't build it, they can't come," he says. And that is the danger.
Labels:
broadband,
business model,
network neutrality
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Enterprise Telecom Spend Now $1500 to $2000 Per Employee, Says Gartner
North American enterprises spent between $1,500 and $2,000 per employee on telecoms services in 2008, say analysts at Gartner. Total telecom spending represents about 20 percent of IT budgets. Wireless spending represents about 15 percent to 30 percent of total telecom spending but remains both the strongest growth category.
Fixed services continue dominate spending primarily due to enterprise spending on data networks.
But enterprises are shifting the way they buy services. Wireline services generally are sourced from multiple providers, as you might expect, given the regional nature of fixed access networks.
Wireless services ncreasingly are sourced on a national basis, when possible. That also makes sense since the tier one mobile providers offer nationwide service.
Contracts that combine buying of fixed and wireless service are more popular when possible, as they generally lead to volume discounts.
MPLS rates fell by double digits in 2008 as enterprises squeeze their VPN transport accounts, Gartner says.
The average North American fixed services contract is a three-year deal with an incumbent provider, although cost concerns have proven a boon for alternative providers and technologies such as audioconferencing.
Enterprises increasingly are bundling wireless with wired services to gain volume discounts, Gartner says. As a result, enterprises have reduced total communicatons spending.
Fixed services continue dominate spending primarily due to enterprise spending on data networks.
But enterprises are shifting the way they buy services. Wireline services generally are sourced from multiple providers, as you might expect, given the regional nature of fixed access networks.
Wireless services ncreasingly are sourced on a national basis, when possible. That also makes sense since the tier one mobile providers offer nationwide service.
Contracts that combine buying of fixed and wireless service are more popular when possible, as they generally lead to volume discounts.
MPLS rates fell by double digits in 2008 as enterprises squeeze their VPN transport accounts, Gartner says.
The average North American fixed services contract is a three-year deal with an incumbent provider, although cost concerns have proven a boon for alternative providers and technologies such as audioconferencing.
Enterprises increasingly are bundling wireless with wired services to gain volume discounts, Gartner says. As a result, enterprises have reduced total communicatons spending.
Labels:
broadband,
business VoIP,
marketing,
mobile
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Will Generative AI Follow Development Path of the Internet?
In many ways, the development of the internet provides a model for understanding how artificial intelligence will develop and create value. ...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...