State of the Internet 2011

If you thought that the Internet was just “really big,” you are sadly mistaken. The Internet is colossal, says Online Schools. This is an entertaining infographic.
Created by: Online Schools

State of the Internet 2011

PayPal Allows Androids to "Bump" to Transfer Money

PayPal has launched a peer-to-peer near field communications application that lets people pay and get paid in a matter of seconds by simply tapping together two Samsung Nexus S phones.

Read more here.

Google PageRank is Like the Richter Scale

As part of a well put together evergreen article discussing of Google's "PageRank" algorithms, important to all marketers who hope their online sites will get lots of traffic, Dharmesh Shah points out that the algorithm is believed to be calculated on a logarithmic scale, much as the Richter Scale, used to measure the intensity of earthquakes, is logarithmic.

The big difference between a linear scale and an algorithmic scale is the startling difference in magnitude. The difference between a page rank of one and two is an order of magnitude, or 10 times. as the difference between an earthquake described as four is 10 times the magnitude of an earthquake rated as a five.

The difference between a page ranking of one and three is two orders of magnitude, or at least 100 times different. What does that mean for search engine optimization? Simply that, no matter what you do, only a few "pages," out of all pages available on the Web, ever have the top ranks. On a scale of zero to six, the top sites, ranking "six," represent just 0.1 percent of all websites for example.

The practical impact is a bit like the notion of how many Twitter followers a person attracts. In practice, only a small number of celebrities have "millions of followers." On the web, only a relatively small number of sites, often large media companies, big brands or celebrities, actually have the top page ranks.

That doesn't mean content marketers should be careless about search engine optimization. It just means that such techniques only work, up to a point. "Order of magnitude" changes in page rank are quite difficult. See Read more here.

Sprint Unlimited Strategy Shows One Way "Disruption" Can Play Out

Facing larger and more powerful competitors, contestants in just about any market will cast about for strategies that allow them to survive, and hopefully narrow the gap with the dominant providers.

Attackers frequently employ the "same features, lower price" strategy. It's an easy thing for consumers to understand. Network services providers often try the "get more, pay less" strategy in ways that take advantage of unused capacity (evening hours and weekends for voice, for example). Service providers can offer "unlimited calling" at times when the network has ample surplus capacity, and the incremental cost of such operations is quite low.

Bandwidth providers, whether in the local access markets or in the global undersea business, often will instinctively offer "same features, lower price" products because they can. If your network is brand new, has lots of capacity but you have few customers, that is a rational strategy.

Not all disruption comes from smaller, attacking firms, though. As Apple has shown, sometimes disruption happens best when a strong, financially well-heeled firm decides to disrupt a market. Still, smaller firms in highly-competitive markets, who have lots of capacity but few or fewer paying customers, often can be expected to try the "get more for your money" strategies. Sprint is doing so.

Young Dominate "Cell Mostly" Web Use

Younger adults, minorities, and lower income earners who own smart phones are likeliest to mostly use them to access the Internet, according to a July 2011 survey from the Pew Research Center Internet & American Life Project.

Some 42 percent of 18-to-29-year-old smart phone owners mostly use them for web access, double the 21 percent of 30-to-49-year-olds who do so and more than four times the 10 percent of smartphone owners 50 and older.

The obvious implication might be that users with less disposable income are likely to rely more heavily on mobile broadband, which they often must purchase in order to use the devices they prefer. The other possible explanation is that, for many users, mobile broadband is the most valuable and therefore the most-used form of access.

Young, Minorities Dominate ‘Cell Mostly’ Web Use

Microsoft's "can't lose" mobile strategy

Microsoft’s deal with Nokia should increase the company's position in the smart phone operating system market. The number of smart phones now being sold with Windows Mobile or the newer Windows Phone 7 is pretty small, perhaps less than five percent of all sales, representing licensing fees of perhaps $10 to $15 license fee per phone. Some argue Microsoft can make more money by licensing other parts of its intellectual property portfolio.

Microsoft is now seeking to get royalties from all Android handsets sold It is quite likely that Microsoft will be able to extract licensing fees (eventually) from all the manufacturers. And at $5 per handset produced, that is a substantial revenue stream.

No disrespect, as a business model is a good thing to have. At the same time, in a market seemingly driven by the likes of Apple and Google, one has to ask the question: when was that last time Microsoft actually did something "enchanting" in the mobile market?

Microsoft's "can't lose" mobile strategy

Google accounts for 92% of UK searches

Experian Hitwise data shows that Google in June 2011 had a 92 percent market share of all searches carried out by U.K. Web users, up 1.5 percent on the previous month and 0.2 percent higher than the same period in 2010.

Microsoft, Yahoo! and Ask Sites accounted for seven percent of searches, with ‘Other’ accounting for the remaining one percent.

Google accounts for 92% of UK searches