What is Tablet Impact on Mobile Networks?

Mobile network planning is never easy, these days. Unlike fixed networks, that generally exhibit clear and stable usage patterns, mobile network demand can fluctuate unpredictability. 


Tablets are the new factor, as most mobile network bandwidth demand has been driven by PC dongles and increasingly by smart phones.


But tablets add a new unknown element. The simple answer is that, over time, "more" bandwidth will be consumed by tablet devices.


The issue is how much new demand will be created, and just as importantly, where and when that demand occurs.


And there arguably are significant differences in the way people use bandwidth, when out and about and when at home or in the office.

On one hand, possibly nine percent of mobile usage occurs when people are out and about. 


About nine percent of usage occurs when users are moving, the balance occurring either at stationary locations such as home or work.

As early as 2007, about 40 percent of total mobile traffic was generated in the home environment Informa Telecoms & Media has said. By 2013 in-home usage is expected to reach 58 percent, with about eight percent of total mobile traffic offloaded to fixed broadband, Informa predicted at that time.

In 2008, the home environment represented more than 43 percent of total mobile data traffic and Informa revised its forecast, estimating that in-home mobile usage would climb to 60 percent by 2013.

Mobile voice minutes of use in the home environment represented about 42 percent of total mobile voice traffic by the end of 2008. Mobile voice usage at home would gradually increase to reach 49 percent by 2013, Informa estimated.

Mobile use at work was estimated to represent 30 percent of usage, with nine percent of calls initiated while users were moving. About 21 percent of calls would be generated from other public environments. All of that makes planning difficult.

The good news is that users often simply do not have time to engage with applications that consume lots of  when on the move. On the other hand, at-home usage probably will look more like PC behavior. 

The new question is what impact tablets will have. Since most tablets now in the user base rely on Wi-Fi connections, the impact on mobile networks might be very slight. But it would be reasonable enough to assume that, over time, tablet consumption might start to resemble smart phone patterns. 

The good news there, for mobile network capacity planners, is that Wi-Fi usage will be offloaded traffic, and will have minimal mobile network impact. 

At-home tablet mobile network usage, though more substantial than "on the go" usage, at least will be more predictable. 

iZettle, "Square of Europe," Adds New Features

Most of the time, we seem to focus on mobile payments as a value for end users. 


But iZettle seems to have approached it as a payments system with built-in value for the retailers who have to support the systems.


Some call iZettle the "Square of Europe," and that's a reasonable enough way to describe it. 


The company has released a brand new app with new features that help sellers manage inventory. 


The latest version, iZettle 1.7,  comes with product folders. Some retailers have libraries with tens or even hundreds of products. 


Now you can drag and drop products on one another to gather them all in a single product folder. Users also can also move your products around simply by pressing and holding. 


The latest version also adds a feature called "Product variants" that allows retailers to better support sale of clothing, food items or other products that come in different sizes, colors or price ranges, for example. 

Mobile Now "Is Communications"

About 85 percent of U.S. consumers use mobile devices for communications. For many, mobile is the way they generally use voice, even when they have access to a landline service.

In 2011, 202 million adults own mobile phones. 

Mobile usage has surpassed landline usage as well. Today, approximately 28 percent of American consumers do not have a landline phone whereas just 15 percent do not have a mobile phone. In addition, mobile usage has surpassed online usage (85 percent of people, compared to 78 percent of people who use landline services.

Another New Social Network Revenue Model" Affiliate Fees

Pinterest, the social networking site, has the typical problem any software or application provider often has: no immediate revenue model.

Traffic to the Pinterest website has grown by a factor of 10 over the past six months.  In January 2012, the number of visitors on Pinterest.com was almost a third of that on Twitter.com. That’s a lot of users.

"Pinterest's monetization strategy isn't in the oven and it's not even off the baking table," says Jeremy Levine, a board member of Pinterest and a venture capitalist at Bessemer Venture Partners. "We have one hundred ideas but no execution as of yet."

But Josh Davis  says that isn’t quite true. Highly unusually for a start-up social network, Pinterest does seem to have an existing revenue stream that is different from all the other monetization schemes other major social networks have developed.

Twitter has “promoted tweets.” Facebook has display ads. LinkedIn had the same “no revenue” problem years ago, but now makes money from subscriptions, advertising sales, and hiring solutions.

LinkedIn gets  25 percent of its revenue from premium subscriptions; 33 percent from text and display advertising and 42 percent from LinkedIn Jobs, a job-matching or automated headhunting service.

Pinterest apparently already has develooped an affiliate revenue stream. If you post a pin to Pinterest, and it links to an e-commerce site that happens to have an affiliate program, Pinterest modifies the link to add their own affiliate tracking code.

If a user clicks through the picture from Pinterest and makes a purchase, Pinterest gets paid. So add “affiliate links” to the list of possible revenue models for a “free to use” social network.

Pinterest apparently is using a service called SkimLinks. SkimLinks' software looks at links users post to websites, determines if there is an affiliate program to which they can be linked, and appends a code that ensures Pinterest gets credit for (and data from) the referral.

That is highly unusual for a young social network. But it tends to validate the notion that users are the “product” that underlies all social network revenue models, at the end of the day.

Some would argue that Pinterest already is driving truly massive traffic to retail sites, by some accounts more than YouTube, LinkedIn, and Google+ combined, and the affiliate links model should be meaningful.

Commissions on sales for affiliate links vary widely, but they average around five percent. After SkimLinks gets paid, Pinterest might be looking at 3.75 percent net revenue. That will not be enough, by itself, to keep Pinterest in business over the long term. But it is more revenue than virtually all the other big social networks had when they started.

Consumer Group asks Federal Trade Commission to Take Action Against Google

Consumer Watchdog has asked the Federal Trade Commission to take immediate action against Google for tracking user web browsing on Apple Mac PCs,  even though Apple allows Safari operating system users to disable tracking. Precisely what action the FTC could take is not clear, since Google has stopped the tracking already.

Consumer Watchdog did not mention iPhone or iPad devices in its complaint, but the insertion of cookies to track behavior apparently could affect users of iPhones or iPads as well.

The complaint illustrates a growing business issue Google faces, namely regulator scrutiny of the sort that lead to the breakup of the AT&T system in the early 1980s and the consent decree Microsoft battled and lived with for two decades.

And dare one mention that Apple now is bigger than both Google and Microsoft put together? The point is that Google now faces the sort of mounting scrutiny of just about any significant move it makes, and there is historical precedent for arguing that, eventually, “something” will be done to limit Google’s further expansion into new lines of business.

The issue of Google bypassing built-in security settings on the Safari web browser on iPhones and iPads, which Google now has discontinued, or the FTC complaint, is not the biggest problem.

The danger is that Google has provided regulators one more bit of evidence that it might now be time to start regulating Google, as antitrust regulators earlier had placed limits on Microsoft’s own freedom to bundle applications and essentially enter new businesses.

Some might note that Microsoft has spent 21 years fighting antitrust battles with the U.S. government and similar battles with regulators for the European Community.

Most do not remember that there was serious talk of splitting Microsoft up into separate companies in 2000. Microsoft agreed to a court settlement in 2002 that ended that threat, but at a price. Microsoft essentially was placed in hand cuffs.

In April 2000 U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruleed that  Microsoft unlawfully maintained a monopoly in Windows and unlawfully tied its browser to Windows. The proposed remedy was a breakup of Microsoft into two different companies, one for apps and the other for operating systems.

The Department of Justice and Microsoft agreed on a proposed settlement for the antitrust case in 2001.
In November 2002, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly approved the settlement, which included a five-year consent decree on the part of Microsoft. That deal was extended in 2006 to 2009 and then again in 2009 unitl May 2011.

The consent decree barred Microsoft from entering into Windows agreements that excluded competitors from new computers, and forced the company to make Windows interoperable with non-Microsoft software. In addition, an independent technical committee would field complaints that might arise from competitors.

But some would argue that the tedious litigation made Microsoft more cautious as a company.

Some now say growing scrutiny of Google is not helped when Google takes actions that raise the perception that it now might require similar throttling.

The problem for Google is going to be growing antitrust scrutiny that, sooner or later, is likely to be applied.

So far, little discussion of that sort seems to have occurred about Apple. History suggests such scrutiny ultimately will happen. Apple already is a bigger company that Google and Microsoft put together.

Sooner or later, should Apple continue to grow, antitrust scrutiny will start to happen.

The point is that Google cannot, henceforth, take the risk of appearing “too big, too cavalier or too influential.” Dumb mistakes will have consequences.

Mobile Continues to Reshape Computing

We continue to see, on a continuing basis, more evidence that mobility is reshaping the telecom, computing, content and marketing and advertising businesses. 

Apple’s mobile operating system, iOS now has surpassed the desktop operating system (Mac OS) in web browsing market for the first time in history. 

IDC reports that in 2011, Apple shipped 93.2 iPhone units and 40 million iPad units. 

Nor is Apple the only example of that trend. According to new research from Canalys, smart phone shipments overtook personal computers in 2011, moving 487.7 million units over the course of the year, compared to 414.6 million PCs. 


Without much doubt, these changes illustrate the importance of mobile trends in consumer behavior that indicate a clear shift towards a more mobile, on-the-go lifestyles and devices. 

It is possible that the shift to mobile devices now is having clear impact even on the use of specific browsers and operating systems. Over the last seven months, for example, Chitika Research has noted a steady decline in Windows browser share, at the same time that iOS surpassed Mac OS in terms of browsing share. 

Since August 2011, Windows has declined in share by almost 10 percent, Chitika notes. 

How Much Money Can Facebook Make from Mobile Advertising in a Year?

Facebook could generate over $1.2 billion from mobile advertising in its first year from just the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, analysts at mobileSquared predict. 

Facebook could earn an average revenue oer user of about $6.50 a year.

Based on a further assumption that Facebook will serve an ad every 20 seconds via its mobile sites or apps, and using  using a cost per thousand impressions model of $0.25, Facebook would generate $653.7 million in revenues from mobile advertising in the United States alone over a 12 month period.

Facebook also could generate mobile advertising revenues of $166.6 million in its first year in the UK, around $100 million in France, Germany, and Italy, and around $70 million in Spain.