Monday, August 1, 2016

Comcast Isn't the Biggest "Cable" Company Anymore

The largest U.S. “cable” company is not cable company, anymore. Counting firms the old way, Comcast is the biggest “cable TV” company.

  1. Comcast: 22,400,000
  2. Charter Communications: 18,421,145
  3. Cox Communications: 4,540,280
  4. Altice: 3,948,000
  5. Mediacom: 862,000

But it long has been the case that there are several ways to deliver linear entertainment video: cable TV networks, satellite and now telco networks. Using a “linear video entertainment” definition, rather than counting by access network technology, the market shares are different.

  1. AT&T U-Verse and DirecTV: 26,000,000
  2. Comcast: 22,400,000
  3. Charter Communications: 18,421,145
  4. Dish Network: 13,909,000
  5. Verizon FiOS: 4,700,000

Cloud Services Leaders Growing at 53% to 162% Annual Rates

Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, IBM and Google combined control well over half of the worldwide cloud infrastructure service market, and are growing briskly. Google’s cloud infrastructure grew at a 162 percent annual rate, while Microsoft’s cloud services business grew at a 100-percent rate, from the second quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2016, according to Synergy Research Group.

Amazon, the market leader, grew at a 53 percent rate, while IBM’s business grew at a 57 percent rate.

In aggregate the big four grew their cloud infrastructure service revenues 68 percent in the second quarter of 2016, while the next 20 largest cloud providers grew by 41 percent and all other smaller providers grew by 27 percent.

The market as a whole grew by 51 percent. Amazon’s business is almost three times the size of its nearest competitor and has a clear lead in all major regions and most segments of the market.

source: Synergy Research Group

For Verizon, Being #3 to Google and Facebook Might Not be a Bad Outcome

Few--if any--observers seem to think Verizon will gain market share against Google and Facebook with its combined AOL-Yahoo business.

“Verizon Communications Inc.'s planned purchase of Yahoo! Inc. for $4.83 billion in cash would make the telecom giant the clear number-three player in the U.S. digital ad market,” says Seth Shafer, SNL Kagan research analyst. “However, gaining ground on Google Inc. and Facebook Inc. could prove difficult.”

Some might argue that being third, and even lagging Google and Facebook by quite some measure is not such a bad outcome for Verizon.

Challenging either Google or Facebook in a serious way might seem fanciful to most observers. But, at a minimum, the new Verizon unit is likely a $4 billion or bigger annual revenues business, which is sort of a minimum for Verizon to bother with.

Also, a market positioning of “we offer an alternative to Google and Facebook” would seem to be sustainable.

source: SNL Kagan

Automation, Machine Learning are Issues in Developing and Developed Nations

Automation, including use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, might boost productivity, but also cause job loss, in developing as well as developed countries. That is not a new problem.

The advent of the industrial revolution caused similar stresses two hundred years ago. But as a growing number of us might say, high productivity gains that lead to job stresses have to be coupled with high efforts to ameliorate those stresses.

An increase in inequality seems to be a byproduct of technology revolution, and therefore creates a challenging new problem to solve.



Sunday, July 31, 2016

India Mobile Subscriptions Drop in May 2016

One does not often see mobile subscriptions decline in any developing country market, in any particular quarter or month, but that seems to be what happened in India in May 2016, when total mobile subscriptions dropped about one percent.

In urban areas, mobile subscriptions dropped two percent. In rural areas, subscriptions grew.

But most of the dip comes from share losses by several mobile providers, not necessarily an  across the board decline in net subscribers for most mobile service providers.

Fixed voice subscriptions also dropped, but that is not entirely unexpected in many markets.


Consumer Revenues Propel Service Provider Revenue Growth

Among the big changes in the telecom business over the last three to four decades, one of the most prominent is the growing revenue contribution (and profit contribution, in many cases) made by consumer accounts, as opposed to business customers.

That was not always the case. In the past, super-high profits from business customers funded operation of networks also serving consumers.

These days, it is consumer revenues that lead growth for most service providers.

The other big shift is the relative contributions made by mobile, as opposed to fixed, revenues.

As I mentioned during a recent keynote address for Telegration business partners (a U.S.-based sales organization focusing on enterprise and mid-market customers), when conducting analyses of Internet adoption on a global basis, one can essentially ignore all fixed network access, look only at mobile Internet access, and still get the trend right, and the magnitudes of usage about right.

That is quite a change from historical patterns, where business user revenues accounted for about a half of total revenues in developed countries. But the direction of change is mostly towards greater consumer revenues (What EY calls “smart operator”).

A few service providers might opt for becoming “mostly” wholesale providers for retail partners, in which case the revenue contributors shift dramatically to “business” revenue (wholesale). So far, we see little evidence that service providers are willing to retrench as wholesale capacity suppliers, however.

And that means the percentage of revenue earned from consumers is going to dominate, in the future.

Except for about 10.5 percent of Internet users in Asia, for example, who do get access using a fixed network, substantially all the rest of the Internet users do so using mobile networks.

In some Asian countries--such as the Philippines and Thailand--perhaps 20 percent to 25 percent of people use a fixed Internet connection (primarily urban residents). But in many other countries, usage of fixed Internet access can be in single digits, or less than one percent.

As we start to connect the half of people who do not presently use the Internet, the percentage of mobile or wireless users will climb, while the percentage of fixed network users shrinks. And we are talking about roughly two billion new Internet users, in Asia alone.

That is not to say other access methods will not emerge, but it is hard to ignore the fact that nearly 90 percent of Internet access in Asia now is provided by mobile networks.

Rural coverage, language relevance, device prices and recurring access costs all are issues. Still, mobile has to be reckoned the primary delivery vehicle.

As the 80/20 rule suggests, "20 percent of activities produce 80 percent of the results." For Internet access, the practical application is that only mobile really matters, where it comes to consumer Internet access.

Will that change in the future? It is possible. If Internet of Things develops as a key revenue driver, then enterprise or business revenue contributors will grow, again.

source: ITU

Bringing stakeholders together to understand changing supply and demand issues, and the business model for Internet access, is a key focus of the Spectrum Futures conference. Here’s a  fact sheet and Spectrum Futures schedule.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

90% of Asia Internet access is Provided by Mobiles

Across Asia, about 58 percent of people still do not use the Internet, according to the International Telecommunications Union.

If you exclude China, Japan and Korea, plus the city-states of Singapore and island of Taiwan, the percentage of Internet non-users can, in some cases, range upwards of 76 percent.

Except for about 10.5 percent of Internet users in Asia, who do get access using a fixed network, substantially all the rest of the Internet users do so using mobile networks. That is not to say other access methods will not emerge, but it is hard to ignore the fact that nearly 90 percent of Internet access in Asia now is provided by mobile networks.

Rural coverage, language relevance, device prices and recurring access costs all are issues. Still, mobile has to be reckoned the primary delivery vehicle.

As I mentioned during a keynote address for Telegration business partners (a U.S.-based sales organization focusing on enterprise and mid-market customers), when conducting analyses of Internet adoption, one can essentially ignore all fixed network access, look only at mobile Internet access, and still get the trend right, and the magnitudes of usage about right.

As the 80/20 rule suggests, "20 percent of activities produce 80 percent of the results." For Internet access, the practical application is that only mobile really matters, where it comes to consumer Internet access.

Bringing stakeholders together to do something about that is the mission of the Spectrum Futures conference. Here’s a  fact sheet and Spectrum Futures schedule.



Directv-Dish Merger Fails

Directv’’s termination of its deal to merge with EchoStar, apparently because EchoStar bondholders did not approve, means EchoStar continue...