Under the Best of Circumstances, How Much Economic Growth Can High Quality Communications and Computing Produce?

A government official from one of the South Pacific islands asked me recently why there frequently seems to be so little discussion of the role 5G can play in promoting economic development in the South Pacific. 

There are a couple of practical reasons. Economic activity, almost always, hinges on population. Most economic activity occurs where there are substantial numbers of people. High rates of economic growth require other inputs as well, but population mass is the foundation, since perhaps 70 percent of all economic activity is generated by consumer spending.

So policy makers confront the fact that total population in the South Pacific is small, perhaps 2.3 million people, scattered across 10 million square miles. 

In other words, as a practical matter, ask yourself whether the absolute best communication facilities--fast internet, low retail costs, ubiquitous terrestrial coverage, big modern data centers, 100-percent fast mobile internet coverage--can make a big difference in terms of spurring economic development, in areas of low population, in areas remote from population centers.

Producers and suppliers go where the people are, fundamentally. So economic activity tracks population. On the scattered South Pacific islands, gross domestic product can be quite low, by global standards. 

With the exception of Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea, GDP on any single island is quite small, orders of magnitude smaller than on the two bigger islands and the continent of Australia. GDP on a global scale also is quite small. 

source: Wikipedia

That being the case, even 100-percent adoption of any technology in the South Pacific does not move the global needle. Conversely, what happens in India and China, right now, drives both growth of fixed and mobile internet access globally. 

At a more granular level, and ignoring contribution to global output, assume that there are no gaps whatsoever in small South Pacific island technology supply or take rates, and that supply is equal to that found among the top 20 countries globally.

We all commonly believe that broadband causes economic development, and that, to the contrary, its lack retards economic growth. Let us be clear, the two are correlated. What nobody can prove is the thesis that better broadband “causes” faster economic growth or more growth. But we all behave as though this were the case.

But it might not be true. It is entirely possible that strong economic growth itself creates the demand for better computing and communications assets and deployment. 

In other words, wealthy consumers in areas with high job growth and economic growth demand--and can afford--better internet. That, in turn, creates the supply. 

In rural U.S. or any other markets, we might note that the business case for more investment is sharply limited, precisely because the pool of customers is sharply limited.   

What could change? How much more economic output is possible? Economists always point out that consumer activity accounts for 70 percent of gross domestic product. So people matter,  and that is the ultimate point. Even supplied with the absolute best computing and communications resources, the South Pacific islands are too thinly populated and too remote from other population centers to become much-bigger platforms for economic activity. 

How much more job creation, retail spending, use of edge computing, warehouse siting, transportation facilities, factories or business activity is possible, even with the absolute best computing and communications facilities being in place?

In other words, as much as policymakers should always strive to make high-quality communications available in rural and remote areas, the actual potential economic upside is probably sharply limited. The social and educational benefits are another matter.

Still, we generally overestimate the effect high-quality computing and communications can have, where it comes to economic development, in lightly-populated areas remote from large population centers.

Most Computing Now Requires Communication

Communications have been important for some enterprise data communications since the days of mainframes, but computing now fundamentally relies on communications, making the old phrases "computing and communications" or "information and communications technology" a functional reality underpinning nearly all computing instances and workloads.

In early mainframe days, only a relatively few businesses required communications support for their computing needs. But communications gradually has become a foundational requirement for computing.

Telcos in the 1950s began using their own networks for internal purposes, eventually creating the T1 standard for data communications in 1958.

Communications arguably became more important for computing with the development of ARPANET in the 1960s, with the emergence of Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol in the 1970s, and in the 1980s the ability to use dial-up telephone networks to support ARPANET.

Communications became even more important in the 1990s with the invention of the World Wide Web and the emergence in the 2000s of the Internet and WWW as staples of consumer experience.

The smartphone and the web illustrate the centrality of communications for computing, as remote computing requires communications. A similar observation can be made about business and enterprise computing, which now also relies on remote server access and public and private cloud computing.

So it should come as no surprise that public cloud spend is quickly becoming a significant new line item in information technology budgets, especially among larger companies, a survey sponsored by RightScale suggests. 

Among all respondents, 23 percent spend at least $2.4 million annually ($200,000 per month) on public cloud while 33 percent are spending at least $1.2 million per year ($100,000 per month). 

Among enterprises the spend is even higher, with 38 percent exceeding $2.4 million per year and half (50 percent) above $1.2 million per year. 

Small and medium businesses generally have fewer workloads overall and, as a result, smaller cloud bills (just over half spend under $120,000 per year). However, 11 percent of SMBs still exceed $1.2 million in annual spend, RightScale says. 

source: RightScale 

Enterprise respondents run 79 percent of workloads in cloud, with 38 percent of workloads in public cloud and 41 percent in private cloud. Workloads running in private cloud may include workloads running in existing virtualized environments or bare-metal environments that have been “cloudified,” says RightScale. 

Non-cloud computing comprises about 21 percent of respondent workloads. 

Small and mid-sized businesses report running 43 percent of workloads using public cloud and also run 35 percent of workloads on private cloud. Some 22 percent of workloads remains on non-cloud platforms. 

source: RightScale

Western Union Partners with Airtel for Mobile Payments

Western Union is partnering with Bharti Airtel to launch real-time mobile payments in India and across 14 countries in Africa, using Airtel Payments Bank and Airtel Africa.

Airtel Payments Bank customers will soon be able to direct a Western Union money transfer into their bank accounts 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Global senders can use Western Union’s digital services in 75 countries plus territories, or the walk-in Agent network across more than 200 countries and territories.

The collaboration with Airtel Africa will enable more than 15 million Airtel Money mobile wallet users in Nigeria, Uganda, Gabon, Tanzania, Zambia, DRC, Malawi, Madagascar, Kenya, Congo, Niger, Tchad, Rwanda and Seychelles to simply route any money transfer received from across the world into their wallets. 

It will also allow senders around the world to push funds directly to an Airtel Money mobile wallet in real-time and store value or pay for goods and services. Service launch is expected in 2020.

India is the world’s largest remittance-receiving country, according to the World Bank.

Australian Connectivity Prices Dropped in 2019

Between 2018 and 2019, Australian consumer connectivity prices dropped: down 1.5 percent for fixed network internet access; lower by 6.6 percent for mobile subscriptions and minus 16.4 percent for mobile broadband prices, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. 

source: ACCC

As always, methodology matters. The most basic approach for creating a price index is to measure the change in prices from one year to the next in an average price of a basket of products. 

There is a problem with this basic approach, the ACCC notes. If rapid increases in technology are improving the quality of the products,  then the increases in prices should not be interpreted as price inflation because the price changes partly reflect changes to the product. 

In other words, product quality changes also must be considered. That includes changes in usage allowances or access speeds, for example. It therefore is possible that specific plans might cost more, but represent better value.

Frontier Communications Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

When the world began to deregulate and privatize telecommunications, a new question arose: what would happen if an incumbent service provider proved unable to compete, and was forced out of business? 

Around the turn of the century we saw many bankruptcies of non-dominant service providers, especially those providing long distance capacity services. Since then we have seen a few restructurings of smaller legacy service providers, among them Windstream. 

Now it appears Frontier Communications will enter bankruptcy under laws that allow it to shed debt but continue operating. 

Since national governments consider their core communications facilities to be “national assets” in a real sense, it still seems quite a remote possibility that a failed national service provider would really be allowed to go out of business. 

In many countries, there is more than one service provider which plausibly could continue to serve a whole nation, even if a single major provider went out of business. 

Still, the possible bankruptcy of a former national telco remains a possibility unimaginable a few decades ago. 

Why the Need for "Agility?"

Agility, an organization’s ability to rapidly respond to change, is a highly-recommended organizational capability. Like all such recommended business values, agility arguably matters most when markets are changing substantially and rapidly; when competition is fierce; when customers and their demand have evolved.

In fact, agility is most important for industries and firms that have faced deregulation, globalization and internet-based competition. That applies almost classically to the telecom industry, which many would argue must replace half its current revenue every decade. 

That might seem unlikely, but is a simple reflection of the fact that product cycles exist for every communications product, as such cycles exist for every product.

source: University of Michigan Information and Technology Services

Microsoft gets cited as a firm that managed to create a culture of agility, arguably leading to an ability to adapt to a changing market. The point, to be clear, is business results. 

source: Yahoo Finance

For South Korean FTTH, Definitions Matter

Sometimes definitions matter; sometimes they are less relevant. In the U.S. market, it does not much matter whether access media is fiber to the premises or hybrid fiber coax or wireless. The issue is how much bandwidth consumers can buy, and at what cost, irrespective of access media.

In the South Korean internet access market, one is confronted by apparently contradictory statistics: fiber to premises supply is quite high, but take rates for fiber to home services is relatively low. 

On one hand, fiber to the premises is said to reach 80 percent to 98 percent of locations. On the other hand, take rates are said to be as low as 10 percent, 38 percent or as high as 98 percent. 

The other issue is speed. Just because a connection uses optical fiber media does not mean the supplied services run at especially high speeds. Some telcos that installed FTTH systems back in the late 1990s were supplying service at 10 Mbps. In South Korea, in 2017, average FTTH speeds were as low as 29 Mbps. 

In 2019, according to Ookla, South Korea average internet access speeds were about 144 Mbps downstream. 

source: FTTH Council Asia Pacific

So something odd has to be explained: FTTH supply is quite high, and yet average speeds are perhaps lower than one might expect. That explanation probably has to rely on the high percentage of multiple dwelling units in South Korea. 

Apartments represent perhaps 52 percent to 60 percent of dwellings in South Korea, and arguably is as high as 70 percent in Seoul. And that is likely a key to understanding the data. By definition, an optical fiber connection to a high-rise building goes into the basement, with actual end user access over a copper connection. 

source: FTTH Council Asia Pacific

In a strict sense, one might argue that the actual end user connection therefore uses copper cables, not optical fiber.