Observers say artificial intelligence often changes “how work is done” or “how well work is done” (quality improvements) rather than just “how fast it is done,” leading to outcomes that are difficult to capture in traditional productivity statistics.
That is particularly true for intangible products such as software, e-books, downloadable music, mobile applications, healthcare consultations, financial advice, legal services, streaming subscriptions, web hosting or any other product that is experiential (haircuts or live concerts).
Product quality changes, called “hedonic,” are particularly hard to quantify in these cases. Among the classic examples are personal computers that, over time, incorporate faster processors, more memory, better user interfaces, displays or audio, but without a price increase.
Smartphones might add premium materials, for example.
The point is that much of AI’s value is qualitative: improved decision-making, better user experiences, or reduced risk in complex processes (like drug discovery) that will not always show up as an immediate increase in volume-based output.
And all that is hard to measure.
That is not unusual for general-purpose technologies such as electricity or the internet. But financial analysts want quantitative metrics, so industries will develop them.
All of these metrics can be imprecise. It can be hard to isolate AI impact from all other organizational processes, for example.
No comments:
Post a Comment