Some things should not be forgotten. D-Day, 81 years ago is among them.
Friday, June 6, 2025
D-Day Plus 81

Thursday, June 5, 2025
Could Court-Ordered End to Google Search "Exclusive Placement" Actually be Good for Google?
One of the assertions in the “United States v. Google” 2020 antitrust case against Google is that Google acts as a monopolist in paying $26 billion annually to Apple and others to be the default search app on iOS devices, for example, sharing ad revenue resulting from searches on those devices and operating systems.
Some of us might simply note that it is very easy to change a default browser or search engine, but others will point out that few users (less than five percent) actually seem to do so. Assuming Alphabet knows its business better than we casual users do, paying to be the default search engine pays off.
The issue is whether that is monopolistic behavior, if business partners and users benefit, and if users largely use Google search because they consider it the best app in the category.
So here’s the irony. If, in the penalty phase of the trial, Google is forced to stop paying for exclusive placement as the default search engine on Apple and other devices or operating systems, it might well avoid paying the ad share fees, but remain the dominant search engine, based simply on user preference for it.

Wednesday, June 4, 2025
Telco Role in AI or Data Monetization Seems Limited, Really
One learns over time to be skeptical about some claims repeatedly made by leaders in many industries. Consider the claim by retail telco executives that they possess all sorts of behavioral data that can be monetized. What, exactly, are those sorts of data?
Some skeptics might point out that the data is mostly about use of communication services and devices; as well as service plan preferences. Telcos sometimes claim to have demographic data, but most of that is indirect. Location data is possible, but many app providers seem to be able to generate that themselves.
Compare that to what a Meta or Alphabet might know: browsing histories; search queries; app usage; clicks; location; social graph.
Feature | Telco Behavioral Data | Facebook/Alphabet Behavioral Data |
Data Types | Service usage, support, demographics, purchases, devices | Browsing history, search queries, app usage, clicks, social interactions, location, interests |
Granularity | Often aggregated or anonymized for privacy | Highly granular, often linked to individual profiles |
Personalization Potential | Limited, especially with anonymization | Very high, enables highly targeted ads and content |
Use Cases | Service improvement, pricing, churn reduction, marketing | Targeted advertising, content recommendation, user profiling |
Regulatory Constraints | Strict privacy regulations, especially for sensitive data | Privacy regulations, but often more flexible with consent |
Data Utility | Good for trends, limited for individual insights | Excellent for both trend and individual-level insights |
Skeptics might argue that telco data is rather limited as a source of value or monetization. But telco execs keep insisting what they have is valuable. Some of us would say we haven’t seen it.
Telco data might be viewed as substantial for internal operational and strategic planning, but it is generally less powerful than the behavioral data available to digital platforms for marketing and user engagement purposes.
By analyzing support interactions, complaint logs, and feedback, telcos might be able to identify recurring issues such as network reliability problems, billing confusion, or service dissatisfaction. Also, analytics can detect subtle patterns such as a drop in usage, frequent complaints, or late payments that can signal a customer is at risk of churn.
But even there, the analytics might only be used proactively for business accounts. I see little evidence telcos use that data to do something about potential consumer account churn.
In some ways, the issue is similar to the potential value of artificial intelligence, where telcos are going to be users of AI, but probably not in any particularly advantaged position where it comes to being a supplier of AI products and services.

Tuesday, June 3, 2025
Most Professionals in Accounting, Finance, Consulting, Law Use AI at Work
A survey conducted for Intapp finds 72 percent of professionals in accounting, finance, consulting and law use artificial intelligence at work.

"Minimal" Economic Impact of AI Chatbots, Study Suggests
With the obvious caveat that investing in new technology often does not produce measurable immediate outcomes, a study of large language model economic outcomes in Denmark suggests very-slight outcomes.
Indeed, the study authors say “AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation.”
The study published by the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research involved two large-scale adoption surveys conducted in late 2023 and 2024 covering 11 occupations; 25,000 workers and 7,000 workplaces.
Productivity gains were said to be modest, with an average time savings of three percent. But the study notes that AI chatbots have created new job tasks for 8.4 percent of workers, including some who do not use the tools themselves.
Nor has there been any impact on worker earnings. “Workers overwhelmingly report no impact on earnings as of November 2024,” the study says.
Nor do productivity gains seem to have much impact on earnings. “We estimate that only three to seven percent of workers’ productivity gains are passed through to higher earnings,” say authors Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard.
“Comparing workplaces with high versus low rates of chatbot usage, we find no evidence that firms with greater adoption have experienced differential changes in total employment, wage bills, or retention of
incumbent workers,” the authors say.
The authors also note that Denmark has institutional characteristics similar to those of the United States, with similar uptake of generative AI; how hiring and firing costs; decentralized wage bargaining and annual wage negotiations.
The 11 occupations studied included accountants, customer support specialists, financial advisors, HR professionals, IT support specialists, journalists, legal professionals, marketing professionals, office clerks, software developers, and teachers.
The findings should not come as a surprise. The “productivity J-curve" suggests that initial investments in new technologies may temporarily suppress productivity before delivering long-term benefits.
Study | Technology Examined | Lag Time Observed | Key Findings |
Digital technologies, AI | Years to decades | Benefits emerge after business process redesign and "creative destruction." Historical parallels (e.g., electric power) show lags of decades. Generative AI may shorten lags to months or years. | |
CEPR Study on French Industrialization 3 | General-purpose technologies | 5–10 years | Firms delayed adoption due to uncertainty, and early adopters operated technologies inefficiently. Aggregate productivity gains materialized slowly as organizational practices evolved. |
IT investments | 2–5 years | Executives reported 5-year lags for IT payoffs. Complementary investments and learning curves delayed measurable productivity growth. | |
Productivity Paradox Research 5 | IT, automation | 2–5 years | "Productivity J-curve" observed: short-term costs offset gains until workflows adapted. Measurable aggregate gains emerged in the 2000s from 1990s IT investments. |
Brynjolfsson et al. (McKinsey) 7 | Generative AI | Months to a few years | Shorter lag due to existing digital infrastructure, but still requires process redesign. Early adopters see inefficiencies before optimization. |

Why Advertise Where Few See the Ads? That's AI Challenge for Search Advertising
For some of you possibly old enough to remember where advertising spending used to occur, the pattern is quite different now. For example, influencer marketing gets the same amount of spending by advertisers as does print. And podcasts get more spending than print.
And who knows what the spending pattern will look like once artificial intelligence takes hold and most people routinely can avoid clicking on links delivered to them by a search engine? By one early estimate, the introduction by Google of AI Mode caused a drop in the first organic links on a keyword by more than a third, for example.
One can see that in the “zero click” rate, for example.
Study | Impact on Search Traffic (%) | Zero-Click Rate (%) | Key Findings |
Semrush AI Overviews Study | 13.14 | 36.2 | 13.14% of queries triggered AI Overviews in March 2025; a significant share of searches now zero-click. |
Ahrefs Study | 34.5 | — | 34.5% drop in position 1 click-through rate (CTR) with AI Overviews. |
Amusive Study | 15.49 | — | 15.49% average CTR drop for affected queries. |
Bain & Company Research | 20 (range: 15–25) | 60 | 80% of users rely on AI summaries; 60% of searches end without a click. |
Forbes Analysis | 15 (range: 15–64) | 60 | Up to 64% decline in organic traffic in some industries; 60% of searches are now zero-click. |
But the biggest changes are search, social media and streaming, which did not exist as categories before 1995 or so. By some estimates, as much as 60 percent of tall advertising happens using search, social media and streaming video platforms. Add in e-commerce placements and as much as 70 percent of all advertising now uses those digital channels. Add YouTube and digital might claim as much as 80 percent of all activity.
U.S. Advertising Channels | |
Channel | Market Share % |
Search | 28-30 |
Social Media | 22-25 |
Streaming TV | 12 to 15 |
E-commerce | 8 to 12 |
Linear TV | 18-22 |
Video (YouTube) | 8 to 10 |
Radio | 4 to 6 |
Outdoor | 3 to 4 |
2 to 3 | |
Audio/podcast | 3 to 4 |
Email marketing | 1 to 2 |
Influencer marketing | 2 to 3 |
On a global basis, in 1995 the leading channel was television, followed by newspapers, then magazines. Note the absence of all digital channels.
Channel | Estimated Market Share (%) |
Television | 37% |
Newspapers | 28% |
Magazines | 12% |
Radio | 9% |
Outdoor | 7% |
Cinema | 2% |
Other | 5% |
But get set for another huge shift, as advertisers discover it makes little sense to pay for advertising that fewer people are going to see.

-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...