Showing posts with label telepresence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label telepresence. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Telepresence for the Home?
Cisco executive Bob Plamondon, telepresence is now trickling down the market down to small enterprises. And the next stage of that adoption curve is the home market.
Labels:
telepresence
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
What's the ROI from Telepresence?
Unfortunately, "usage" is not the same thing as "return on investment" If those two metrics were in fact directly related, nobody would ever have a problem figuring out the return on investment from deploying any unified communications solution.
Generally speaking, one has to assess "success" using soft measures, though some will point to offset travel costs. The problem is that it is difficult to quantify "better quality communications" or "faster development time" or "reduced friction," though those are the sorts of benefits one would expect to see.
The trouble is that most of what one can quantify is "usage."
source
Generally speaking, one has to assess "success" using soft measures, though some will point to offset travel costs. The problem is that it is difficult to quantify "better quality communications" or "faster development time" or "reduced friction," though those are the sorts of benefits one would expect to see.
The trouble is that most of what one can quantify is "usage."
source
Labels:
ROI,
telepresence
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Boston Tops "Good for Telecommuting" List
Boston is the top U.S. medium-sized or large city for telecommuting, according to a new survey of 3,600 workers in 36 markets.
The survey, commissioned by Microsoft Corp., examined urban areas based on factors including the percentage of workers who say their jobs can be done from outside the office; the percentage of companies with formal work-from-home policies; the extent of support from bosses for working from home, as gauged by workers; and the extent of technological support provided by employers to enable working from home.
Most respondents said they were more productive when working from home. The top complaint listed was the lack of face-to-face interaction with colleagues.
Fewer than half of the companies surveyed had telecommuting policies. Within those companies that did have such policies, a little more than a third of workers took advantage of the opportunity.
Those workers listed achieving work/home balance, saving on gasoline and avoiding long commutes as their top reasons for telecommuting.
As for where they did work outside the office, many employees listed family vacation spots as a top choice. About a quarter of telecommuting workers said they set up operation in coffee shops. Some 10 percent worked from doctors’ offices.
The increase in telecommuting is being driven by the economy, which has made companies less willing to relocate staff, and by technology, which makes remote work lots easier.
After Boston, top telecommuting cities were:
Raleigh-Durham, N.C.
Atlanta
Denver
Kansas City, Mo.
Richmond, Va.
Austin, Texas
New York
Sacramento, Calif.
Portland, Ore.
source
The survey, commissioned by Microsoft Corp., examined urban areas based on factors including the percentage of workers who say their jobs can be done from outside the office; the percentage of companies with formal work-from-home policies; the extent of support from bosses for working from home, as gauged by workers; and the extent of technological support provided by employers to enable working from home.
Most respondents said they were more productive when working from home. The top complaint listed was the lack of face-to-face interaction with colleagues.
Fewer than half of the companies surveyed had telecommuting policies. Within those companies that did have such policies, a little more than a third of workers took advantage of the opportunity.
Those workers listed achieving work/home balance, saving on gasoline and avoiding long commutes as their top reasons for telecommuting.
As for where they did work outside the office, many employees listed family vacation spots as a top choice. About a quarter of telecommuting workers said they set up operation in coffee shops. Some 10 percent worked from doctors’ offices.
The increase in telecommuting is being driven by the economy, which has made companies less willing to relocate staff, and by technology, which makes remote work lots easier.
After Boston, top telecommuting cities were:
Raleigh-Durham, N.C.
Atlanta
Denver
Kansas City, Mo.
Richmond, Va.
Austin, Texas
New York
Sacramento, Calif.
Portland, Ore.
source
Labels:
Microsoft,
telecommuting,
telepresence,
telework
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Recession Spurs SMB Shift to Conferencing, Away from Overseas Travel
The global recession seems to have spurred more thinking--and activity--by businesses large and small about the use of conferencing services and applications as a replacement for business travel.
A recent survey of U.K. users by Skype indicates that about a quarter of U.K. small and mid-sized businesses have started using conferencing and communications to displace international travel.
Although 24 percent of U.K. small business executives surveyed communicate with international colleagues on a daily basis, 54 percent say they have had to take unnecessary overseas trips when conferencing would work.
The emergence of more sophisticated technologies is having a clear impact on the way that businesses are opting to communicate and do business.
About 41 percent of respondents says they use instant messaging to avoid some travel. About 40 percent use Skype, while 34 percent use teleconferencing. About 28 percent say they use some form of video conferencing.
Video-based communication likely is the biggers winner as travel substitutes have been sought.
Significantly, almost half of SMEs in the United Kingdom (49 percent) are planning to increase the amount it is used for business and 59 percent indicate it will be a direct replacement for business travel.
That isn't to say other methods are ineffective. About 65 percent of respondents said email was effective. Voice was seen by 39 percent of respondents as effective. Video calls were seen by 36 percent of respondents as effective, compared with 29 percent citing Skype.
About 17 percent say instant messaging is effective. About nine percent say social networking is effective as well.
But 36 percent of respondents said they miss having a real picture of the person that they are dealing with. For videoconferencing as for entertainment television, the advantage of "realism," a greater sense of "being there," is what drives image or audio resolution, high-definition images and audio, bigger displays and ease of use.
“With the obvious cuts in business travel, companies need to find new ways to communicate, collaborate and compete,” says Stefan Oberg, Skype for Business VP.
“Without regular face to face meetings, tools that enable people to build and maintain trusted relationships are key," he says.
A recent survey of U.K. users by Skype indicates that about a quarter of U.K. small and mid-sized businesses have started using conferencing and communications to displace international travel.
Although 24 percent of U.K. small business executives surveyed communicate with international colleagues on a daily basis, 54 percent say they have had to take unnecessary overseas trips when conferencing would work.
The emergence of more sophisticated technologies is having a clear impact on the way that businesses are opting to communicate and do business.
About 41 percent of respondents says they use instant messaging to avoid some travel. About 40 percent use Skype, while 34 percent use teleconferencing. About 28 percent say they use some form of video conferencing.
Video-based communication likely is the biggers winner as travel substitutes have been sought.
Significantly, almost half of SMEs in the United Kingdom (49 percent) are planning to increase the amount it is used for business and 59 percent indicate it will be a direct replacement for business travel.
That isn't to say other methods are ineffective. About 65 percent of respondents said email was effective. Voice was seen by 39 percent of respondents as effective. Video calls were seen by 36 percent of respondents as effective, compared with 29 percent citing Skype.
About 17 percent say instant messaging is effective. About nine percent say social networking is effective as well.
But 36 percent of respondents said they miss having a real picture of the person that they are dealing with. For videoconferencing as for entertainment television, the advantage of "realism," a greater sense of "being there," is what drives image or audio resolution, high-definition images and audio, bigger displays and ease of use.
“With the obvious cuts in business travel, companies need to find new ways to communicate, collaborate and compete,” says Stefan Oberg, Skype for Business VP.
“Without regular face to face meetings, tools that enable people to build and maintain trusted relationships are key," he says.
Labels:
Skype,
telepresence,
video conferencing,
web conferencing
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
IBM, Cisco Eat Own Dog Food
Cisco, touting the power of telepresence, really is pushing for use of telepresence inside its own organization. Likewise, as IBM touts the value of Web-based tools for enteprises, it is rolling out Web 2.0 technologies such as blogs, wikis, mashups and virtual reality technologies to help its employees be more productive.
IBM's Metaverse virtual reality software is one of these areas. Apparently some 2,200 IBM staffers are testing ways to collaborate with colleagues in the Metaverse.
Ackerbauer said IBM staffers leverage IBM's internal virtual conferencing application through Web services to have online meetings in 3D.
Labels:
Cisco,
IBM,
telepresence,
virtual reality
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
It Will be Hard to Measure AI Impact on Knowledge Worker "Productivity"
There are over 100 million knowledge workers in the United States, and more than 1.25 billion knowledge workers globally, according to one A...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...