ShoZu Ltd has launched its App Store, where smartphone owners can purchase the ShoZu social media app for most major mobile operating systems. The store complements ShoZu’s availability at Apple’s App Store, Nokia’s OVI store and Research in Motion’s BlackBerry App World.
The ShoZu App Store currently offers the ShoZu app for BlackBerry, Windows Mobile and Nokia smartphones, as well as iPhones, with support for additional models and operating systems to be announced. The ShoZu App Store sells the app for the same price as the third-party app stores.
ShoZu describes itself as an intelligent social media hub allowing people to easily exchange video, pictures and commentary between mobile devices and favorite social networks, photo sharing sites and information resources.
The company’s technology provides fast, easy, one-click uploads of photos and video clips from the mobile to the Web, full-resolution photo and video delivery without compression. It also can push content to the phone and work in the background even if a connection is dropped.
Monday, October 12, 2009
ShoZu Launches App Store
Labels:
mobile,
social media,
social networking
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Which User Segments are Most Likely to Switch to Prepaid?
Prepaid wireless has been on a tear of late, growing to 55 million U.S. users and about 17 percent of all U.S. wireless accounts in service. And though prepaid traditionally has been centered on "banking challenged," "low income" or "youth" market segments, that is starting to change as consumers from a wider range of segments seem to be opting for
Often thought of as a "consumer" option, one also has to wonder whether at least some business users might consider switching to prepaid, for at least some employee segments.
That, at least, is what Compass Intelligence thinks could be happening at smaller firms, for example. A recent change that could be driving such interest are new "unlimited" talk and texting plans from firms such as AT&T.
In a recent survey, Compass Intelligence found that a high percentage of respondents indicate plans to give new prepaid devices to one or more employees.
Another segment Compass Intelligence found was interested in prepaid plans are "larger families." The larger the family, the more mobiles they currently use and the more likely they will replace postpaid wireless devices with prepaid options, Compass Intelligence says.
Users with multiple mobile devices also are more likely to indicate they plan to replace a postpaid wireless account with a prepaid option as compared to other segments.
About 11 percent of the respondents with three or more mobiles are willing to replace one or more of their postpaid mobiles with prepaid, while only three percent of the respondents with only one mobile device indicated plans to do so.
When adding a new device, 22 percent of respondents indicate they will add prepaid mobile.
The apparent relationship between prepaid demand and family size and number of devices is likely the result of U.S. consumers and businesses seeing wireless devices as "nice-to-have" items that are useful for more members of families and employees, along with the ability to limit financial exposure.
One of the advantages of prepaid service is that it can be terminated easily, allowing parents and business managers to quickly cut back on such service if necessary.
Often thought of as a "consumer" option, one also has to wonder whether at least some business users might consider switching to prepaid, for at least some employee segments.
That, at least, is what Compass Intelligence thinks could be happening at smaller firms, for example. A recent change that could be driving such interest are new "unlimited" talk and texting plans from firms such as AT&T.
In a recent survey, Compass Intelligence found that a high percentage of respondents indicate plans to give new prepaid devices to one or more employees.
Another segment Compass Intelligence found was interested in prepaid plans are "larger families." The larger the family, the more mobiles they currently use and the more likely they will replace postpaid wireless devices with prepaid options, Compass Intelligence says.
Users with multiple mobile devices also are more likely to indicate they plan to replace a postpaid wireless account with a prepaid option as compared to other segments.
About 11 percent of the respondents with three or more mobiles are willing to replace one or more of their postpaid mobiles with prepaid, while only three percent of the respondents with only one mobile device indicated plans to do so.
When adding a new device, 22 percent of respondents indicate they will add prepaid mobile.
The apparent relationship between prepaid demand and family size and number of devices is likely the result of U.S. consumers and businesses seeing wireless devices as "nice-to-have" items that are useful for more members of families and employees, along with the ability to limit financial exposure.
One of the advantages of prepaid service is that it can be terminated easily, allowing parents and business managers to quickly cut back on such service if necessary.
Labels:
business model,
marketing,
mobile,
prepaid wireless
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
AT&T Launches New $60 Unlimited Prepay Plan
AT&T has launched a new $60-a-month unlimited talk and text plan. AT&T's "Unlimited Talk and Text" plan for GoPhone is available October 12, 2009 and offers unlimited nationwide calling and unlimited texting to anyone in the United States, plus texting to Mexico, Canada and more than 100 other countries worldwide, for an additional fee.
“We recognize GoPhone customers have a need for unlimited calling or texting without the commitment of an annual contract,” says Judy Cavalieri, vice president of Prepaid Products for AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets.
The prepaid offer comes without contract, and can be paid for completely "as you go" or as a monthly rate plan, without a contract, credit check or deposit.
The offer is evidence of a new level of competiton in the wireless prepaid business, which now is starting to compete more directly with postpaid offers. Handset limitations are emerging as the key difference between postpaid and prepaid offers, to an extent, not usage charges or even form of payment.
“We recognize GoPhone customers have a need for unlimited calling or texting without the commitment of an annual contract,” says Judy Cavalieri, vice president of Prepaid Products for AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets.
The prepaid offer comes without contract, and can be paid for completely "as you go" or as a monthly rate plan, without a contract, credit check or deposit.
The offer is evidence of a new level of competiton in the wireless prepaid business, which now is starting to compete more directly with postpaid offers. Handset limitations are emerging as the key difference between postpaid and prepaid offers, to an extent, not usage charges or even form of payment.
Labels:
business model,
mobile,
prepaid wireless
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Lots of Changes in Mobile Business
"In our conversations over the past month, we noticed a potential shift in the relationships and economics between wireless carriers and video content providers," says Rajeev Chand, Rutberg & Co. managing director. And that might be the least of the changes of interest to end users.
"For example, several executives noted to us that certain U.S. carriers reduced or decoupled video content bundles from basic or unlimited data plans," he says. "The result has been a short-term reset in the video content provider economics: rather than carriers pay licensing fees for proprietary or bundled content, to assist in subscriber marketing and growth, carriers are paying licensing fees associated with separate video packages which have different consumer buying processes and patterns."
In other words, instead of using video content as a carrot to drive mobile broadband adoption, it is being marketed as a stand-alone application for which addtional fees are required. Oddly enough, at least some mobile operators might be concluding that it doesn't pay to encourage packaged video consumption, at least at lowish prices, especially when the additional load on networks is considered.
“The threat from over-the-top is now and has never been greater,” says Chand. For wireless carriers, the risk is greatest from the incumbent Internet firms, rather than the startup mobile Internet firms, as consumers know the incumbent brands and navigate directly to them.
In that regard, recent movement in the partnership area between Google and Verizon, and Google and Sprint, is interesting.
Though the potential trend will clarify only when a few more moves are made, it appears that AT&T and Verizon are moving in different directions in terms of mobile Web strategy. Sprint, meanwhile, seems to be taking an approach akin to that of Verizon.
The changes could reshape operating system market shares, strategic role of browsers and the ways "open" network platforms can lead to differentiated service experiences.
The potential shift of strategies has been brewing for some time, and perhaps the most-visible sign has been the debate about whether Verizon would embrace the Apple iPhone once AT&T exclusivity ends.
The equally important, but less visible piece of the puzzle is the development relationship Google already has struck up with Sprint Nextel and Clearwire. As part of those efforts, the Android operating system has gotten a boost.
But AT&T might be distancing itself from Google and turning to a range of partners usually more associated with European operators, from Opera to Nokia. That would explain the rather cryptic remarks overheard at the CTIA Wireless I.T. and Entertainment about Symbian "having a resurgence in the U.S. market."
That belief would be hard to explain in the absence of some major push by one of the major U.S. carriers to support Symbian-based devices and applications. Right now, the thinking seems to be that AT&T is considering such a move.
But it would likely be a mistake to characterize the shifts as merely instrumental or confined to market shares for various ecosystem participants. The more important change is the differentiated end user experiences that would be possible.
Though details are sketchy at the moment, the new Google-Verizon collaboration might lead to a distinctive set of user interfaces, applications and devices optimized for the mobile Web, and for users with different key interests.
In the new scenario, carriers would be able to compete on differentiated experience, not just unique handsets, payment models, package elements or device features.
Though one line of thinking is that "open" networks will lead to service providers becoming "dumb pipes," the new approaches aim to create differentiated and packaged experiences that have service providers acting in a more traditional role.
As Verizon seems to be positioning its Google collaboration, the service provider would create Android devices carrying the operator's brand and software portfolio, though other Android devices with less integration also would be available.
What is intriguing here is the use of third party and open development, in conjunction with carrier packaging, to produce a flourishing of end user options. Instead of commodity-like devices with a a set look, feel and function, one might see devices optimized for particular end user verticals.
"For example, several executives noted to us that certain U.S. carriers reduced or decoupled video content bundles from basic or unlimited data plans," he says. "The result has been a short-term reset in the video content provider economics: rather than carriers pay licensing fees for proprietary or bundled content, to assist in subscriber marketing and growth, carriers are paying licensing fees associated with separate video packages which have different consumer buying processes and patterns."
In other words, instead of using video content as a carrot to drive mobile broadband adoption, it is being marketed as a stand-alone application for which addtional fees are required. Oddly enough, at least some mobile operators might be concluding that it doesn't pay to encourage packaged video consumption, at least at lowish prices, especially when the additional load on networks is considered.
“The threat from over-the-top is now and has never been greater,” says Chand. For wireless carriers, the risk is greatest from the incumbent Internet firms, rather than the startup mobile Internet firms, as consumers know the incumbent brands and navigate directly to them.
In that regard, recent movement in the partnership area between Google and Verizon, and Google and Sprint, is interesting.
Though the potential trend will clarify only when a few more moves are made, it appears that AT&T and Verizon are moving in different directions in terms of mobile Web strategy. Sprint, meanwhile, seems to be taking an approach akin to that of Verizon.
The changes could reshape operating system market shares, strategic role of browsers and the ways "open" network platforms can lead to differentiated service experiences.
The potential shift of strategies has been brewing for some time, and perhaps the most-visible sign has been the debate about whether Verizon would embrace the Apple iPhone once AT&T exclusivity ends.
The equally important, but less visible piece of the puzzle is the development relationship Google already has struck up with Sprint Nextel and Clearwire. As part of those efforts, the Android operating system has gotten a boost.
But AT&T might be distancing itself from Google and turning to a range of partners usually more associated with European operators, from Opera to Nokia. That would explain the rather cryptic remarks overheard at the CTIA Wireless I.T. and Entertainment about Symbian "having a resurgence in the U.S. market."
That belief would be hard to explain in the absence of some major push by one of the major U.S. carriers to support Symbian-based devices and applications. Right now, the thinking seems to be that AT&T is considering such a move.
But it would likely be a mistake to characterize the shifts as merely instrumental or confined to market shares for various ecosystem participants. The more important change is the differentiated end user experiences that would be possible.
Though details are sketchy at the moment, the new Google-Verizon collaboration might lead to a distinctive set of user interfaces, applications and devices optimized for the mobile Web, and for users with different key interests.
In the new scenario, carriers would be able to compete on differentiated experience, not just unique handsets, payment models, package elements or device features.
Though one line of thinking is that "open" networks will lead to service providers becoming "dumb pipes," the new approaches aim to create differentiated and packaged experiences that have service providers acting in a more traditional role.
As Verizon seems to be positioning its Google collaboration, the service provider would create Android devices carrying the operator's brand and software portfolio, though other Android devices with less integration also would be available.
What is intriguing here is the use of third party and open development, in conjunction with carrier packaging, to produce a flourishing of end user options. Instead of commodity-like devices with a a set look, feel and function, one might see devices optimized for particular end user verticals.
Labels:
apps,
business model,
mobile
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Friday, October 9, 2009
FCC Opens Inquiry into Google Voice Blocking
The Federal Communications Commission has opened an inquiry into Google Voice's call blocking of traffic to some high-cost numbers used by free conference calling services.
Google does not deny blocking access to those numbers, but argues it is a Web service offering an optional call connection service, and does not have a common carrier obligation to deliver calls to virtually any phone number.
AT&T obviously believes Google Voice has to terminate those calls, even though it is an application, not a common carrier provider of voice services.
Google says its phone management service isn't subject to common carrier telephone rules because it is free and consumers can use it only if they have a traditional telephone line.
AT&T and other carriers say they don't want to pay high access charges either, and do not believe any providers of termination services should be able to selectively block calls.
It isn't yet clear where the inquiry might lead, but it is another reminder that the regulatory framework that treats common carriers differently from application providers is intellectually incoherent.
The only issue is whether we are yet at a regulatory tipping point where some drastic revision is needed.
For at least three years, regulators have debated--without clear conclusion--where voice services over the Web fit in. Web services, which can include Skype, maybe Google Voice, and Comcast Digital Voice, are for now viewed as information services and not subject to the more heavily regulated treatment "service providers" are subjected to.
What is clear is that the old distinctions are becoming unworkable.
"Much as the FCC wishes there was still a clear distinction between 'the Internet' and 'the telephone network,' technology has obliterated that difference," Larry Downes, a non-resident fellow at the Stanford Law School Center of Internet and Society, notes.
He proposed the FCC wipe the slate clean: "Hold everyone to the same rules regardless of what information they are transporting-whether voice, video, television, data. Because regardless of who's doing what, these days it's all bits."
Such a sweeping reform necessarily would mean ending the way the nation now regulates cable TV, telephony and the Internet. That will ruffle lots of feathers, but it has been clear for some time that the differing regulatory frameworks increasingly are old of step with market realties.
To wit, we use one set of rules for "telcos," a different set of rules for "cable companies" and a third set for application providers, even when they offer similar, iidentical, overlapping or functionally similar services and applications.
"If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's a duck" is a non-technical way of dscribing how the FCC traditionally has looked at resolving questions within the common carrier world. As more providers enter that business, but with different regulatory treatment, there has to be pressure to treat all ducks as ducks.
Google does not deny blocking access to those numbers, but argues it is a Web service offering an optional call connection service, and does not have a common carrier obligation to deliver calls to virtually any phone number.
AT&T obviously believes Google Voice has to terminate those calls, even though it is an application, not a common carrier provider of voice services.
Google says its phone management service isn't subject to common carrier telephone rules because it is free and consumers can use it only if they have a traditional telephone line.
AT&T and other carriers say they don't want to pay high access charges either, and do not believe any providers of termination services should be able to selectively block calls.
It isn't yet clear where the inquiry might lead, but it is another reminder that the regulatory framework that treats common carriers differently from application providers is intellectually incoherent.
The only issue is whether we are yet at a regulatory tipping point where some drastic revision is needed.
For at least three years, regulators have debated--without clear conclusion--where voice services over the Web fit in. Web services, which can include Skype, maybe Google Voice, and Comcast Digital Voice, are for now viewed as information services and not subject to the more heavily regulated treatment "service providers" are subjected to.
What is clear is that the old distinctions are becoming unworkable.
"Much as the FCC wishes there was still a clear distinction between 'the Internet' and 'the telephone network,' technology has obliterated that difference," Larry Downes, a non-resident fellow at the Stanford Law School Center of Internet and Society, notes.
He proposed the FCC wipe the slate clean: "Hold everyone to the same rules regardless of what information they are transporting-whether voice, video, television, data. Because regardless of who's doing what, these days it's all bits."
Such a sweeping reform necessarily would mean ending the way the nation now regulates cable TV, telephony and the Internet. That will ruffle lots of feathers, but it has been clear for some time that the differing regulatory frameworks increasingly are old of step with market realties.
To wit, we use one set of rules for "telcos," a different set of rules for "cable companies" and a third set for application providers, even when they offer similar, iidentical, overlapping or functionally similar services and applications.
"If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's a duck" is a non-technical way of dscribing how the FCC traditionally has looked at resolving questions within the common carrier world. As more providers enter that business, but with different regulatory treatment, there has to be pressure to treat all ducks as ducks.
Labels:
business model,
consumer VoIP
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
3% Consume 40% of Mobile Bandwidth, AT&T Says
The top three percent of smartphone users consume 40 percent of all mobile data bandwidth, says AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets president Ralph de la Vega. Those three percent of users also consume 13 times the data of the average smart phone user, he adds. Another way of quantifying such usage is to note that users who consume 40 percent of AT&T's mobile data bandwidth constitutute just 0.9 percent of all AT&T postpaid mobile subscribers.
The point was clear enough: Without adequate management of network access, most customers will find their experience damaged because of a small number of other users.
There are legitimate public policy concerns about anti-competitive behavior in the wireless and wireline businesses where it comes to gatekeepers of any sort using that power to impair competition. But that is a different and distinct matter from the obvious need to manage shared network resources in ways that actually preserve reasonable access for all other users.
De la Vega used the word "crowd out" to describe such contention, and it is a legitimate issue. Anti-competitive actions certainly are to be protected against. But there are valid network resource managment issues that obviously have to be addressed as well, especially in the wireless domain.
Beyond that, there are valid reasons for wanting competition protected, but without stifling consumer access to new products that offer mass market customers features enterprise users take for granted, such as the ability to prioritize their own use of bandwidth to perserve performance of mission-critical applications. If any consumer end user wants to prioritize their own video, voice or other bits, they ought to be able to do so.
There is nothing anti-competitive about this, so long as any applications in the class can receive such prioritization. Consumer advocates are right to note that issues can arise if voice bits sold by the ISP can be prioritized, but not voice bits sold by other competing service providers.
Some approaches will work better than others, and that is an issue one would hope policymakers take seriously into account as new "neutrality" rules are crafted.
Labels:
apps,
broadband,
business model,
mobile,
network neutrality
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Telemedicine Spending to Approach $3.6 Billion Annually by 2014
Wireless service providers likely will be key beneficiaries of increased spending on tele-medicine services and devices will generate nearly $3.6 billion in annual revenue within the next five years, says Pike & Fischer Senior Analyst Tim Deal.
The need to control health care costs, along with the development and expansion of faster wireless broadband networks, smartphones, and data compression solutions, will drive the market growth, Deal says.
Wireless applications, devices, and services solutions will account for more than 70 percent of the total market spend within five years.
Driving that spending is the economic stimulus law that President Obama signed earlier this year. That initiative includes $20 billion for health information technology, with a specific focus on electronic medical records and telemedicine, Deal says.
"We project that at least 25 percent of the $20 billion in stimulus funds earmarked for health information technology will be applied toward broadband-enabled telemedicine services such as remote patient monitoring and mobile access to medical records, and consumer applications such as interactive fitness guides and mobile health-related videos," says Deal.
AT&T will have the largest presence in this market, followed closely by Verizon and Sprint Nextel, Deal projects.
The need to control health care costs, along with the development and expansion of faster wireless broadband networks, smartphones, and data compression solutions, will drive the market growth, Deal says.
Wireless applications, devices, and services solutions will account for more than 70 percent of the total market spend within five years.
Driving that spending is the economic stimulus law that President Obama signed earlier this year. That initiative includes $20 billion for health information technology, with a specific focus on electronic medical records and telemedicine, Deal says.
"We project that at least 25 percent of the $20 billion in stimulus funds earmarked for health information technology will be applied toward broadband-enabled telemedicine services such as remote patient monitoring and mobile access to medical records, and consumer applications such as interactive fitness guides and mobile health-related videos," says Deal.
AT&T will have the largest presence in this market, followed closely by Verizon and Sprint Nextel, Deal projects.
Labels:
apps,
business model,
mobile
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
AT&T Chief Warns About Heavy Users
The top three percent of smartphone users consume 40 percent of all mobile data bandwidth, says AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets president Ralph de la Vega. Those three percent of users also consume 13 times the data of the average smart phone user, he adds. Another way of quantifying such usage is to note that users who consume 40 percent of AT&T's mobile data bandwidth constitutute just 0.9 percent of all AT&T postpaid mobile subscribers.
The point was clear enough: Without adequate management of network access, most customers will find their experience damaged because of a small number of other users.
There are legitimate public policy concerns about anti-competitive behavior in the wireless and wireline businesses where it comes to gatekeepers of any sort using that power to impair competition. But that is a different and distinct matter from the obvious need to manage shared network resources in ways that actually preserve reasonable access for all other users.
De la Vega used the word "crowd out" to describe such contention, and it is a legitimate issue. Anti-competitive actions certainly are to be protected against. But there are valid network resource managment issues that obviously have to be addressed as well, especially in the wireless domain.
Beyond that, there are valid reasons for wanting competition protected, but without stifling consumer access to new products that offer mass market customers features enterprise users take for granted, such as the ability to prioritize their own use of bandwidth to perserve performance of mission-critical applications. If any consumer end user wants to prioritize their own video, voice or other bits, they ought to be able to do so.
There is nothing anti-competitive about this, so long as any applications in the class can receive such prioritization. Consumer advocates are right to note that issues can arise if voice bits sold by the ISP can be prioritized, but not voice bits sold by other competing service providers.
Some approaches will work better than others, and that is an issue one would hope policymakers take seriously into account as new "neutrality" rules are crafted.
The point was clear enough: Without adequate management of network access, most customers will find their experience damaged because of a small number of other users.
There are legitimate public policy concerns about anti-competitive behavior in the wireless and wireline businesses where it comes to gatekeepers of any sort using that power to impair competition. But that is a different and distinct matter from the obvious need to manage shared network resources in ways that actually preserve reasonable access for all other users.
De la Vega used the word "crowd out" to describe such contention, and it is a legitimate issue. Anti-competitive actions certainly are to be protected against. But there are valid network resource managment issues that obviously have to be addressed as well, especially in the wireless domain.
Beyond that, there are valid reasons for wanting competition protected, but without stifling consumer access to new products that offer mass market customers features enterprise users take for granted, such as the ability to prioritize their own use of bandwidth to perserve performance of mission-critical applications. If any consumer end user wants to prioritize their own video, voice or other bits, they ought to be able to do so.
There is nothing anti-competitive about this, so long as any applications in the class can receive such prioritization. Consumer advocates are right to note that issues can arise if voice bits sold by the ISP can be prioritized, but not voice bits sold by other competing service providers.
Some approaches will work better than others, and that is an issue one would hope policymakers take seriously into account as new "neutrality" rules are crafted.
Labels:
att,
network neutrality
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
FCC Chair Promises More Mobile Spectrum
"What happens when every mobile user has an iPhone, a Palm Pre, a Blackberry Tour or whatever the next device is?" asks Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski."What happens when we quadruple the number of subscribers with mobile broadband on their laptops or netbooks?"
"The short answer: we will need a lot more spectrum," he says. So look for the FCC to explore ways to promote spectrum efficiency and use of Wi-Fi, for example.
"Wi-Fi allows carriers to offload to fixed broadband as much as 40 percent of traffic in the home, freeing up capacity of licensed spectrum," he says.
But even efficiency measures do not alleviate the need for more spectrum. So the FCC chairman says he will work on reallocating spectrum currently being used for other purposes.
"The short answer: we will need a lot more spectrum," he says. So look for the FCC to explore ways to promote spectrum efficiency and use of Wi-Fi, for example.
"Wi-Fi allows carriers to offload to fixed broadband as much as 40 percent of traffic in the home, freeing up capacity of licensed spectrum," he says.
But even efficiency measures do not alleviate the need for more spectrum. So the FCC chairman says he will work on reallocating spectrum currently being used for other purposes.
Labels:
broadband,
business model,
mobile
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
U.S. Wireless Data Hits New High
Wireless data service revenues climbed to more than $19.4 billion for the first half of 2009, CTIA-The Wireless Association says. This represents a 31 percent increase over the first half of 2008. In addition, wireless data revenues were more than 25 percent of all wireless service revenues.
The survey also found that more than 246 million data-capable devices are in use, while more than 40 million of these devices are Ssmartphones or wireless-enabled PDAs. More than 10 million are wireless-enabled laptops, notebooks or aircards.
More than 740 billion text messages carried on carriers’ networks during the first half of 2009, roughly 4.1 billion messages per day. That’s nearly double the number from last year, when only 385 billion text messages were reported for the first half of 2008.
Wireless subscribers are also sending more pictures and other multi-media messages with their mobile devices—more than 10.3 billion MMS messages were reported for the first half of 2009, up from 4.7 billion in mid-year 2008.
As of June 2009, the industry survey recorded more than 276 million wireless users. This represents a year-over-year increase of nearly 14 million subscribers.
Wireless customers used more than 1.1 trillion minutes in the first half of 2009—breaking down to 6.4 billion minutes-of-use per day—and six-month wireless service revenues of nearly $76 billion.
The survey also found that more than 246 million data-capable devices are in use, while more than 40 million of these devices are Ssmartphones or wireless-enabled PDAs. More than 10 million are wireless-enabled laptops, notebooks or aircards.
More than 740 billion text messages carried on carriers’ networks during the first half of 2009, roughly 4.1 billion messages per day. That’s nearly double the number from last year, when only 385 billion text messages were reported for the first half of 2008.
Wireless subscribers are also sending more pictures and other multi-media messages with their mobile devices—more than 10.3 billion MMS messages were reported for the first half of 2009, up from 4.7 billion in mid-year 2008.
As of June 2009, the industry survey recorded more than 276 million wireless users. This represents a year-over-year increase of nearly 14 million subscribers.
Wireless customers used more than 1.1 trillion minutes in the first half of 2009—breaking down to 6.4 billion minutes-of-use per day—and six-month wireless service revenues of nearly $76 billion.
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Study Finds Consumers Do Not Want Targeted Ads
“Contrary to what many marketers claim, most adult Americans (66 percent) do not want marketers to tailor advertisements to their interests, s new study from the Annenberg School for Communication, University of California Berkeley School of Law and the Annenberg Public Policy Center suggests.
“Moreover, when Americans are informed of three common ways that marketers gather data about people in order to tailor ads, even higher percentages— between 73 percent and 86 percent—say they would not want such advertising,” the Annenberg study says.
Respondents showed somewhat more interest in receiving personalized discounts and news, but still, less than one-half of Americans wanted any tailored Web content at all.
That was true of consumers in every age group—even young adults ages 18 to 24 were more likely to say no to behavioral targeting than to accept it, except for discounts.
More than two thirds of respondents to the Annenberg/Berkeley study felt they had lost control over their personal information. At the same time, however, they believed businesses handled their data well and that they were already protected by current regulations.
One suspects the responses might be different if consumers are asked whether they would be willing to receive tailored messages in exchange for some other tangible benefit, such as lower Internet access costs, free text or lower-cost voice, discounts or other tangible benefits.
The precedent is TV commercials. Just about everybody says they do not like commercials. But if asked whether they would rather watch TV without commercials, if the cost were higher, most people then say they will choose an ad-supported service.
“Moreover, when Americans are informed of three common ways that marketers gather data about people in order to tailor ads, even higher percentages— between 73 percent and 86 percent—say they would not want such advertising,” the Annenberg study says.
Respondents showed somewhat more interest in receiving personalized discounts and news, but still, less than one-half of Americans wanted any tailored Web content at all.
That was true of consumers in every age group—even young adults ages 18 to 24 were more likely to say no to behavioral targeting than to accept it, except for discounts.
More than two thirds of respondents to the Annenberg/Berkeley study felt they had lost control over their personal information. At the same time, however, they believed businesses handled their data well and that they were already protected by current regulations.
One suspects the responses might be different if consumers are asked whether they would be willing to receive tailored messages in exchange for some other tangible benefit, such as lower Internet access costs, free text or lower-cost voice, discounts or other tangible benefits.
The precedent is TV commercials. Just about everybody says they do not like commercials. But if asked whether they would rather watch TV without commercials, if the cost were higher, most people then say they will choose an ad-supported service.
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Monday, October 5, 2009
New AT&T Mobile Browser
AT&T has developed its own mobile browser, providing customers three windows to the Web. From the homepage, users can easily browse the global Internet as well as assign bookmarks and shortcuts or set other preferences so they have quick access to their favorite content.
A second window gives users location-aware local news and weather; one-click results for nearby restaurants, nightlife venues, ATMs and other points of interest; and access to maps, driving directions and traffic information.
A third window delivers the latest headlines from popular news, sports and entertainment sites.
Additionally, customers accessing att.net from their PC can customize their mobile att.net page by sending shortcuts to popular Web sites through a "Send to Mobile" feature.
"The new browser powering the att.net service brings the best of the open Web to consumer feature phones while making the mainstay of the mobile Web easy to find and also delivering local tools and bookmarking management," says Ted Woodbery, vice president of Wireless Data, Voice and Ancillary Products for AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets.
The custom browser suggests one way service providers can optimize mobile Web experiences for users by making navigation easier. AT&T also is introducing new phones late this fall, including the Samsung "Flight," which features both a touchscreen and a QWERTY keypad.
A second window gives users location-aware local news and weather; one-click results for nearby restaurants, nightlife venues, ATMs and other points of interest; and access to maps, driving directions and traffic information.
A third window delivers the latest headlines from popular news, sports and entertainment sites.
Additionally, customers accessing att.net from their PC can customize their mobile att.net page by sending shortcuts to popular Web sites through a "Send to Mobile" feature.
"The new browser powering the att.net service brings the best of the open Web to consumer feature phones while making the mainstay of the mobile Web easy to find and also delivering local tools and bookmarking management," says Ted Woodbery, vice president of Wireless Data, Voice and Ancillary Products for AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets.
The custom browser suggests one way service providers can optimize mobile Web experiences for users by making navigation easier. AT&T also is introducing new phones late this fall, including the Samsung "Flight," which features both a touchscreen and a QWERTY keypad.
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Does Net Neutrality Posse Credit Risk for U.S. Wireless Providers?
While there is still uncertainty around potential new rules regarding net neutrality and its impact on wireless operators, Fitch Ratings does not believe potential regulatory changes will materially affect the credit profiles of wireless companies over the longer term.
Fitch does believe the controversial plans outlined by the FCC chairman could face process delays and potential legal challenges once there is clarity about the proposed rules. In other words, there will be no clarity for some time after promulgation of new rules.
In Fitch's opinion, the competitive environment would have likely dictated that the wireless industry naturally evolve in this direction but the conditions and rules currently contemplated by the FCC will likely accelerate the pace at which this transition occurs and place more definitive regulatory restrictions on wireless operators.
Consequently, carriers will likely need to adapt access plans to mitigate the impact that devices with more data intensive applications could have on network quality.
Since nearly all markets experience lower demand when prices are raised, it is likely that access pricing will evolve in ways that generally match consumption to usage, though that does not have to take the form of strict metering of usage, but more likely will take the form of buckets of use, one would suspect.
Fitch also believes that 4G networks offer the potential to generate additional revenue from several new sources like machine-to-machine applications which could more than offset pressure from further erosion of voice related average revenue per user.
From a credit perspective, Fitch believes the dominant market share, higher margins, strong free cash flow, and robust spectrum portfolios of Verizon Wireless and AT&T Wireless strongly position the companies to capture additional share and future market growth opportunities, at least partially offsetting structural changes that could pressure certain revenue and cash flow streams.
However, the market strength of Verizon and AT&T has implications for the remaining national, regional and niche wireless operators, which will likely face increasing credit risk as the wireless industry evolves to 4G and the competitive market intensifies for certain products and services.
Fitch does believe the controversial plans outlined by the FCC chairman could face process delays and potential legal challenges once there is clarity about the proposed rules. In other words, there will be no clarity for some time after promulgation of new rules.
In Fitch's opinion, the competitive environment would have likely dictated that the wireless industry naturally evolve in this direction but the conditions and rules currently contemplated by the FCC will likely accelerate the pace at which this transition occurs and place more definitive regulatory restrictions on wireless operators.
Consequently, carriers will likely need to adapt access plans to mitigate the impact that devices with more data intensive applications could have on network quality.
Since nearly all markets experience lower demand when prices are raised, it is likely that access pricing will evolve in ways that generally match consumption to usage, though that does not have to take the form of strict metering of usage, but more likely will take the form of buckets of use, one would suspect.
Fitch also believes that 4G networks offer the potential to generate additional revenue from several new sources like machine-to-machine applications which could more than offset pressure from further erosion of voice related average revenue per user.
From a credit perspective, Fitch believes the dominant market share, higher margins, strong free cash flow, and robust spectrum portfolios of Verizon Wireless and AT&T Wireless strongly position the companies to capture additional share and future market growth opportunities, at least partially offsetting structural changes that could pressure certain revenue and cash flow streams.
However, the market strength of Verizon and AT&T has implications for the remaining national, regional and niche wireless operators, which will likely face increasing credit risk as the wireless industry evolves to 4G and the competitive market intensifies for certain products and services.
Labels:
broadband,
business model,
network neutrality,
wireless
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Net Neutrality Structurally Flawed, Entropy Economics Says
Network neutrality has deep structural flaws, says Bret Swanson, Entropy Economics president.
Though aiming to ensure equal treatment of applications on the best-effort Internet, network neutrality would ban packet prioritization that might actually benefit consumers, denying them the ability to voluntarily buy services that ensure best performance for voice and video, or any other applications they may deem equally important.
Network neutrality as envisioned by the Federal Communications Commission also would prohibit creation and offering of new differentiated services, he argues.
The FCC seems to argue that although the Internet and the Web have been wild successes, the market cannot be counted on to take the Internet to the next level, Swanson argues.
"The events of the last half-decade prove otherwise," he says. Since 2004, bandwidth per capita in the U.S. grew to three megabits per second from just 262 kilobits per second, and monthly Internet traffic increased to two billion gigabytes from 170 million gigabytes—both tenfold leaps.
The FCC's desire to extend wireline rules to wireless likewise is dangerous, he argues. No sector has boomed more than wireless, yet the FCC wants to extend new regulations to the technically complicated and bandwidth-constrained realm of wireless, he argues.
Wireless carriers invested $100 billion in just the past three years, and the United States vaulted past Europe in fast 3G mobile networks while Americans enjoy mobile voice prices 60 percent cheaper than foreign peers, he argues.
The danger is that heavy-handed new rules will stifle needed investment in new networks.
"My research suggests that U.S. Internet traffic will continue to rise 50 percent annually through 2015, and hundreds of billions of dollars in fiber optics, data centers, and fourth-generation mobile networks will be needed," Swanson says. "But if network service providers can't design their own networks, offer creative services, or make fair business transactions with vendors, will they invest these massive sums to meet, and drive, demand?"
"If you don't build it, they can't come," he says. And that is the danger.
Though aiming to ensure equal treatment of applications on the best-effort Internet, network neutrality would ban packet prioritization that might actually benefit consumers, denying them the ability to voluntarily buy services that ensure best performance for voice and video, or any other applications they may deem equally important.
Network neutrality as envisioned by the Federal Communications Commission also would prohibit creation and offering of new differentiated services, he argues.
The FCC seems to argue that although the Internet and the Web have been wild successes, the market cannot be counted on to take the Internet to the next level, Swanson argues.
"The events of the last half-decade prove otherwise," he says. Since 2004, bandwidth per capita in the U.S. grew to three megabits per second from just 262 kilobits per second, and monthly Internet traffic increased to two billion gigabytes from 170 million gigabytes—both tenfold leaps.
The FCC's desire to extend wireline rules to wireless likewise is dangerous, he argues. No sector has boomed more than wireless, yet the FCC wants to extend new regulations to the technically complicated and bandwidth-constrained realm of wireless, he argues.
Wireless carriers invested $100 billion in just the past three years, and the United States vaulted past Europe in fast 3G mobile networks while Americans enjoy mobile voice prices 60 percent cheaper than foreign peers, he argues.
The danger is that heavy-handed new rules will stifle needed investment in new networks.
"My research suggests that U.S. Internet traffic will continue to rise 50 percent annually through 2015, and hundreds of billions of dollars in fiber optics, data centers, and fourth-generation mobile networks will be needed," Swanson says. "But if network service providers can't design their own networks, offer creative services, or make fair business transactions with vendors, will they invest these massive sums to meet, and drive, demand?"
"If you don't build it, they can't come," he says. And that is the danger.
Labels:
broadband,
business model,
network neutrality
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Enterprise Telecom Spend Now $1500 to $2000 Per Employee, Says Gartner
North American enterprises spent between $1,500 and $2,000 per employee on telecoms services in 2008, say analysts at Gartner. Total telecom spending represents about 20 percent of IT budgets. Wireless spending represents about 15 percent to 30 percent of total telecom spending but remains both the strongest growth category.
Fixed services continue dominate spending primarily due to enterprise spending on data networks.
But enterprises are shifting the way they buy services. Wireline services generally are sourced from multiple providers, as you might expect, given the regional nature of fixed access networks.
Wireless services ncreasingly are sourced on a national basis, when possible. That also makes sense since the tier one mobile providers offer nationwide service.
Contracts that combine buying of fixed and wireless service are more popular when possible, as they generally lead to volume discounts.
MPLS rates fell by double digits in 2008 as enterprises squeeze their VPN transport accounts, Gartner says.
The average North American fixed services contract is a three-year deal with an incumbent provider, although cost concerns have proven a boon for alternative providers and technologies such as audioconferencing.
Enterprises increasingly are bundling wireless with wired services to gain volume discounts, Gartner says. As a result, enterprises have reduced total communicatons spending.
Fixed services continue dominate spending primarily due to enterprise spending on data networks.
But enterprises are shifting the way they buy services. Wireline services generally are sourced from multiple providers, as you might expect, given the regional nature of fixed access networks.
Wireless services ncreasingly are sourced on a national basis, when possible. That also makes sense since the tier one mobile providers offer nationwide service.
Contracts that combine buying of fixed and wireless service are more popular when possible, as they generally lead to volume discounts.
MPLS rates fell by double digits in 2008 as enterprises squeeze their VPN transport accounts, Gartner says.
The average North American fixed services contract is a three-year deal with an incumbent provider, although cost concerns have proven a boon for alternative providers and technologies such as audioconferencing.
Enterprises increasingly are bundling wireless with wired services to gain volume discounts, Gartner says. As a result, enterprises have reduced total communicatons spending.
Labels:
broadband,
business VoIP,
marketing,
mobile
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Access Network Limitations are Not the Performance Gate, Anymore
In the communications connectivity business, mobile or fixed, “more bandwidth” is an unchallenged good. And, to be sure, higher speeds have ...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...

