Nokia Ditches Barcelona

Nokia apparently will not be exhibiting at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona in February 2010. MWC is generally considered the paramount global mobility event, so the move probably is one more indicator of potential change of marketing emphasis by equipment and software providers.

It is no surprise that nearly all communications trade shows and conferences have been under pressure for a couple of years as the recession has forced travel cutbacks, as tier one carriers and enterprises have clamped on severe travel restrictions and some enterprises actually seem to be looking to "prove" that videoconferencing actually saves money by reducing travel expenses.

One way to demonstrate such a business case is to force employees to use videoconferencing and other conferencing tools while restricting travel.

Such changes have been occurring rather broadly on the wired network side of the business for a decade or more. In part, global consolidation means suppliers have fewer customers to sell to. Using direct sales channels typically makes more sense in concentrated markets, compared to fragmented markets.

But other changes have occurred as well. Quite aside from those changes, online communication channels obviously have reduced the need for indirect marketing venues, and have allowed for more use of direct channels. Many firms are shifting spending from legacy channels to their own Web channels, for example.

The deep global recession has had an effect as well, but that is a temporary trend. What remains to be seen is the longer term change of marketing techniques and approaches based on use of Web and IP technologies. Among the bigger changes are a shift from "push" to "pull" marketing, for example.

Mobile Video the Next Big Thing?

Mobile video is considered by many to be among the next big things in mobility use and service provider revenue.

It likely also will be a big driver of consumption calculators, bigger data plans and at-home or Wi-Fi connections.

The reason is physics. Video requires two orders of magnitude worth of bandwidth compared to most other applications. That's a 100 times greater load placed on a network and a user's bandwidth cap.

Some people think Wi-Fi is a transitional access technology, to be replaced by mobile broadband connections. That's not likely. In the business world, Wi-Fi is replacing Ethernet wired networks on a permanent basis.

In the consumer space, Wi-Fi is replacing wired connections as well. And in the public space, Wi-Fi is getting much more use by mobile handsets, where the original connected device was a PC. As video consumption grows, users quickly are going to figure out they can reduce pressure on their bandwidth caps by using Wi-Fi as often as possible, and especially for video streaming or downloads.

Mobile video might be the next big thing in any number of ways.

Online and Mobile Video Still Incremental to TV

It still appears that online and mobile video consumption is incremental to regular TV viewing, The Nielsen Company says.

“Although we have seen the computer and mobile phone screens taking on a significant role, their emergence has not been at the cost of TV viewership,” says Jim O’Hara, The Nielsen Co. president. The reason is that consumers simply are increasing the total amount of video they consume.

“The entire media universe is expanding so consumers are choosing to add elements to their media experience, rather than to replace them,” O'Hara says.

Nielsen data also shows Americans are using DVRs more than ever, watching one hour more of timeshifted TV each month than a year ago. Currently, 30 percent of homes in the U.S. have DVR devices.

During the second quarter of 2009, the number of people watching mobile video increased 70 percent from last year and people who watch video online increased their viewing by 46 percent compared to a year ago. In addition, the average American TV consumption remains at an all-time high (141 hours per month) compared to the same time frame last year.

Online usage is relatively flat since last year, though more people are viewing video online than ever before. But adults 18 to 24 watch more than five hours each month.

Short form video (such as YouTube clips) still makes up 83 percent of online video viewing, while name-brand TV network content comprises the majority of mobile video viewing.

Mobile video viewing continues its upward trend, with over 15 million Americans reporting watching mobile video in the second quarter of 2009, an increase of 70 percent versus last year and the largest annual growth yet seen, Nielsen says.

Service Provider Finds Online Portal Really Works

Telecom service providers need to be more active about using Web channels to build awareness of, and purchases of, new services, says Michael Philpott, Ovum practice leader, says.

As matters now stand, most service providers have few on-going consumer touch points, except for the monthly bill, and one might question whether that is the right time to engage a customer's attention in a positive way.

“Often the main points of customer contact for the broadband service provider is when the customer first signs up from the broadband service, and when something goes wrong, with only the odd e-mail flyer in-between,” says Philpott.

"Those few service providers that still have a successful Internet portal are starting to innovate around that as a way of entertaining, helping, communication with and up-selling services to existing clients," he says.

One pilot by a tier-one player in the U.S. market found that such a strategy increased its marketing success rate over traditional methods by 200 percent.

That service provider also found a 615 percent increase in Web traffic fror a music service, as well as a 55 percent increase in new security subscriptions, plus a 20 percent in security service churn.

Impressive numbers, indeed.

Youth Mobile Market Saturated?

In developed markets, mobile ownership has surpassed saturation, says Graham Brown, Mobile Youth analyst. High levels of prepaid ownership combined with multiple handsets and SIMs means that in some markets, such as the Middle East, it’s not unusual to see penetration rates of 300 percent in specific age groups such as students and young adults.

In most developed markets, youth spend 10 percent to15 percent of their disposable income on mobile phone services. Some 15 years ago, the figure was zero. Brown says That means they’ve forfeited spending on other goods and services.

In particular, you can track the decline of cigarettes, chocolates and CD spending against the rise of mobile spending and suggest that those areas have suffered as consumers shifted spending towards mobility.

Global recorded music sales peaked in 1999 at $40 billion. Cigarette use by teens in the United States peaked in 1998. Those might be direct consequences of greater mobility spending. The flipside of this is that to grow, mobile needs to displace spending on other products.

A direct consequence, Brown argues, is that further growth in youth segment telecoms must face a natural spending ceiling. For the most part, that means an emphasis on churn control. And on that score, most younger subscribers are much more tolerant than one might suppose.

"They want a service that is inconspicuous enough to work consistently in the background without their attention," says Brown. While a small percentage, less than five percent, are motivated by the latest offers and handsets, the majority of youth switch only when the network hits the “annoy” button.

"Teens Don't Tweet?" Not True

One of the most actively discussed topics in the Twitterverse over the past couple months has been the idea that teens don’t tweet as much as older demographics, and certainly not as actively as teens who use other popular social networking sites. But that might have changed, abruptly over the last few months.

According to new data from comScore, younger users – specifically those in the 12-17 and 18-24 year-old demographics – are Twitter’s fastest growing audience segment.

The share of visitors to Twitter under the age of 35 is increasing at a breakneck pace. The most notable positive shifts are evident among the 12-17 and 18-24 year old segments, which are coming at the expense of the 35+ segments, comScore says.

“Teens don’t tweet”? In just a few months, that seems to have changed.

What Paid Online Newspaper Access Might Mean for Telcos

Sometimes one can gain useful insight into the business impact IP services pose for one industry, such as communications, by looking at other industries that also are in the throes of a transition to IP-based services that challenge legacy approaches.

One example is the way newspapers are attempting to create new "for free" versions of their products online, as physical distribution remains under great pressure. While some point to the Wall Street Journal as the preeminent example of an online product that has been successful, most newspapers do not have the scale or unique readership to copy that model in a straightforward way.

That is similar to the difference between firms such as AT&T and Verizon Communications, compared to most other providers in the communications market. Strategic options are hugely different for those two firms and the hundreds to thousands of smaller firms without the assets those two firms possess.

So what about newspapers in smaller, often rural markets? Some point out that the online editions tend to cost about 75 percent of the print product prices, and tend to have smallish readership levels (perhaps five percent or less of the print base).

TheDaily Gazette in Schenectady, New York has a paid print circulation of about 44,000, and offers online-only subscriptions for $2.95 a week; while print subscribers pay $3.00 a week for home delivery, can get unlimited online access for just an additional cent a week. Some limited features remain free to view.

After a conversion to paid online viewing, Web site traffic has plummeted by 40 percent in the three weeks since the Gazette started charging for most of its online content.

The Newport Daily News in Newport, R.I. has a paid print circulation of about 12,000.Online-only subscriptions cost $5 a day, $10 a week, $35 a month, or $345 a year. Print and online combo subscriptions cost $11 a month or $100 a year.

Since converting to paid online access, Web site traffic is down by about 30 percent. But the Daily News says the goal is not to generate online revenue but rather drive readers back to print. That might be working, as single-copy paper sales are up about eight percent. In fact, the online product costs more than the print product.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in Little Rock, Ark. has a paid print circulation of about 183,000 readers. Online-only subscriptions, which include access to an electronic edition, are available for $5.95 a month or $59 a year. Print subscribers get online access for free. Apparently print circulation is down about one percent since the paid online program was started.

Revenue from online subscription sales amounts to only about $200,000 a year, modest compared to print revenues.

The Albuquerque Journal in Albuquerque, New Mexico has about 102,000 paid print readers. The Journal charges $110 a year (or $38.25 for three months) for full access to the paper’s website, along with an electronic edition of the paper.

Readers can also pay $185 a year for a subscription to the print edition, the electronic edition and online access. Alternatively, they can pay $153 a year for home delivery and online access.

Between 1,500 and 2,000 people pay extra each month for some sort of additional online access, a number that has “remained fairly consistent” over the past eight years. Paid daily circulation is down about six percent since the newspaper instituted the paid online plans.

The Bend Bulletin in Bend, Oregon has paid circulation of 32,682. Online-only subscriptions are available for $8 a month or $96 a year. Print subscribers pay $11 a month or $132 a year for home delivery, in addition to online access.

There are 1,200 online-only subscribers, or about 3.6 percent of the print base.

Based on those examples, one might conclude that paid alternatives to print circulation have had modest success, and that is partly or primarily intentional. The newspapers want online access to remain expensive enough that it simply makes more sense to pay for the paper version.

Communication servicer providers likely do not have even that option. Unlike newspapers, telcos and cable companies cannot "wall off" customers who have broadband connections from using "over the top" voice or applications. Charging higher prices for VoIP than for legacy voice, for example, therefore is not an option. Unlike newspapers, third party VoIP providers also can supply a fully-functional substitute to legacy voice. That is not the case for local newspapers, for which there is no convenient content.substitute.

But there is one similarity. Daily newspapers, like landline voice, seem to be products for which there is declining demand. Newspaper readership has been declining for more than a decade or two. Landline voice subscriptions have been declining since 2000.

Current newspaper policies about charging for online access might only delay further decline. Likewise, charging higher prices for VoIP service compared to legacy voice likewise seems unfruitful, as users have other functional substitutes. What remains unclear is the long-term consequences of charging identical prices either for VoIP or legacy voice service. Up to this point, dominant service providers have tended to price both products in similar ways.

Unlike newspapers, telcos already have other replacement products to sell, namely wireless voice, wireless data and broadband. So a rational strategy might be to harvest much of the legacy voice business as long as possible, then shifting to a lower-priced VoIP service at some point, when a lower-priced VoIP product can compete well with third party alternatives and the providers actually make less money by sticking with legacy pricing.

Right now, a telco executive would rationally conclude that firms make more money by sticking to higher prices for legacy voice and losing market share to lower-price VoIP services, especially when many see landline voice as a product in the declining years of its life cycle.

That doesn't mean major changes couldn't happen. Nobody yet knows whether service providers can shift to a new features-driven model where the basic access costs little, but powerful new features are what people pay for.

Consider what is happening in the mobile business. In many cases, mobile users pay more for data access, features and service than they do for voice usage, for example.

Still, telcos are better placed than newspapers. Newspapers are in the ad-supported content business. Newspaper execs seem to be using paid online to prop up the legacy business.

Telcos already are multi-product businesses. They are growing new businesses to replace their older business, and only need to harvest their original business, while experimenting with applications that are replacements for that older business.

Unified communications could be the revenue driver, not the minutes of use, in other words.

That's a better place to be.