Sometimes one can gain useful insight into the business impact IP services pose for one industry, such as communications, by looking at other industries that also are in the throes of a transition to IP-based services that challenge legacy approaches.
One example is the way newspapers are attempting to create new "for free" versions of their products online, as physical distribution remains under great pressure. While some point to the Wall Street Journal as the preeminent example of an online product that has been successful, most newspapers do not have the scale or unique readership to copy that model in a straightforward way.
That is similar to the difference between firms such as AT&T and Verizon Communications, compared to most other providers in the communications market. Strategic options are hugely different for those two firms and the hundreds to thousands of smaller firms without the assets those two firms possess.
So what about newspapers in smaller, often rural markets? Some point out that the online editions tend to cost about 75 percent of the print product prices, and tend to have smallish readership levels (perhaps five percent or less of the print base).
TheDaily Gazette in Schenectady, New York has a paid print circulation of about 44,000, and offers online-only subscriptions for $2.95 a week; while print subscribers pay $3.00 a week for home delivery, can get unlimited online access for just an additional cent a week. Some limited features remain free to view.
After a conversion to paid online viewing, Web site traffic has plummeted by 40 percent in the three weeks since the Gazette started charging for most of its online content.
The Newport Daily News in Newport, R.I. has a paid print circulation of about 12,000.Online-only subscriptions cost $5 a day, $10 a week, $35 a month, or $345 a year. Print and online combo subscriptions cost $11 a month or $100 a year.
Since converting to paid online access, Web site traffic is down by about 30 percent. But the Daily News says the goal is not to generate online revenue but rather drive readers back to print. That might be working, as single-copy paper sales are up about eight percent. In fact, the online product costs more than the print product.
The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in Little Rock, Ark. has a paid print circulation of about 183,000 readers. Online-only subscriptions, which include access to an electronic edition, are available for $5.95 a month or $59 a year. Print subscribers get online access for free. Apparently print circulation is down about one percent since the paid online program was started.
Revenue from online subscription sales amounts to only about $200,000 a year, modest compared to print revenues.
The Albuquerque Journal in Albuquerque, New Mexico has about 102,000 paid print readers. The Journal charges $110 a year (or $38.25 for three months) for full access to the paper’s website, along with an electronic edition of the paper.
Readers can also pay $185 a year for a subscription to the print edition, the electronic edition and online access. Alternatively, they can pay $153 a year for home delivery and online access.
Between 1,500 and 2,000 people pay extra each month for some sort of additional online access, a number that has “remained fairly consistent” over the past eight years. Paid daily circulation is down about six percent since the newspaper instituted the paid online plans.
The Bend Bulletin in Bend, Oregon has paid circulation of 32,682. Online-only subscriptions are available for $8 a month or $96 a year. Print subscribers pay $11 a month or $132 a year for home delivery, in addition to online access.
There are 1,200 online-only subscribers, or about 3.6 percent of the print base.
Based on those examples, one might conclude that paid alternatives to print circulation have had modest success, and that is partly or primarily intentional. The newspapers want online access to remain expensive enough that it simply makes more sense to pay for the paper version.
Communication servicer providers likely do not have even that option. Unlike newspapers, telcos and cable companies cannot "wall off" customers who have broadband connections from using "over the top" voice or applications. Charging higher prices for VoIP than for legacy voice, for example, therefore is not an option. Unlike newspapers, third party VoIP providers also can supply a fully-functional substitute to legacy voice. That is not the case for local newspapers, for which there is no convenient content.substitute.
But there is one similarity. Daily newspapers, like landline voice, seem to be products for which there is declining demand. Newspaper readership has been declining for more than a decade or two. Landline voice subscriptions have been declining since 2000.
Current newspaper policies about charging for online access might only delay further decline. Likewise, charging higher prices for VoIP service compared to legacy voice likewise seems unfruitful, as users have other functional substitutes. What remains unclear is the long-term consequences of charging identical prices either for VoIP or legacy voice service. Up to this point, dominant service providers have tended to price both products in similar ways.
Unlike newspapers, telcos already have other replacement products to sell, namely wireless voice, wireless data and broadband. So a rational strategy might be to harvest much of the legacy voice business as long as possible, then shifting to a lower-priced VoIP service at some point, when a lower-priced VoIP product can compete well with third party alternatives and the providers actually make less money by sticking with legacy pricing.
Right now, a telco executive would rationally conclude that firms make more money by sticking to higher prices for legacy voice and losing market share to lower-price VoIP services, especially when many see landline voice as a product in the declining years of its life cycle.
That doesn't mean major changes couldn't happen. Nobody yet knows whether service providers can shift to a new features-driven model where the basic access costs little, but powerful new features are what people pay for.
Consider what is happening in the mobile business. In many cases, mobile users pay more for data access, features and service than they do for voice usage, for example.
Still, telcos are better placed than newspapers. Newspapers are in the ad-supported content business. Newspaper execs seem to be using paid online to prop up the legacy business.
Telcos already are multi-product businesses. They are growing new businesses to replace their older business, and only need to harvest their original business, while experimenting with applications that are replacements for that older business.
Unified communications could be the revenue driver, not the minutes of use, in other words.
That's a better place to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment