Monday, June 6, 2016

Sri Lanka Launches Smart City Project

Sri Lanka's central hill capital of Kandy will be developed as the first smart city on the island, Sri Lanka Minister of Town Planning and Water Resources Rauf Hakeem said.

Generally speaking a smart city could include intelligent management and monitoring of water, electrical systems and sanitation systems; public transportation or housing automation. Other smart city efforts focus on controlling or monitoring air pollution, street light system or promoting home automation systems.


Siemens also will be working on the smart cities project. That might include use of Siemens systems for smart power grids or energy-efficient buildings.

The Korean government signed a memorandum of understanding with Sri Lanka to participate in the planned $63.2 billion smart city development project.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Korean government plans to share its expertise in several issues including smart water management, intelligent transport systems and smart home systems such as home automation and digital parking systems.

The project is part of Sri Lanka’s plan to develop nine new towns in Colombo and its adjacent areas by 2030.

The plan is to develop nine new cities including one near an airport and other cities specialized in science, industries, tourism and logistics.

In Rural Asia, Internet Access Has to Be Marketed; It Does Not Sell Itself

source: Brookings
In both developed and emerging economies, people remain digitally unconnected for a variety of reasons.

In many cases, access networks literally are not present. In other cases, local-language services and content are unavailable.

Some potential users have poor computer skills or disabilities such as blindness.

In other cases, potential users simply do not understand the benefits, said Jay Chen, Huawei India CEO.

Also, Internet access “does not sell itself.” It “must be marketed.”

“There is an old saying about life insurance: that it isn’t bought, it’s sold, meaning few people want the product unless someone explicitly spells out its benefits,” said Chen. “Connectivity is like that with some populations.”

But connectivity, though necessary, is not sufficient to drive extensive adoption. “Huawei’s research also shows that the world’s most digitally connected countries aim to enhance user experience and stimulate demand, rather than focusing exclusively on providing cheaper connections,” said Chen.

Others note that digital illiteracy (people do not know how to use smartphones, computers), language barriers, literacy, taxes, fees, access prices and lack of perceived relevant content are barriers to wider use of the Internet, even if access facilities are not the issue.

That is another way of noting something very important about the Internet ecosystem. Access is necessary. But the reason access to the Internet is necessary is that people want to do things with apps, and use services.

And controversial though the practice remains, zero rating does work. In a number of countries, zero rating services have enabled people to get access to the Internet who otherwise had no access, a study by Brookings has found.

Globe found zero rating doubled Internet users and grew Globe Internet access customer base 25 percent.

In Paraguay, “the number of people using the internet by 50 percent over the course of the partnership and [an] increase [in the] daily data usage by more than 50 percent,” after zero rating of Internet Basics was introduced.

The number of Facebook users rose 154 percent in Nigeria, 85 percent in Ghana, and 50 percent in Kenya after Internet Basics was introduced.


For the continent of Africa as a whole, there was a reported 114 percent increase in Facebook users after the launch of zero rating , Brookings says.

U.S. Media Consumption Approaching Zero Sum Game

source: eMarketer
Up to this point, U.S. consumer media consumption has not literally been a zero sum game, as total hours of consumption have grown, even as new media formats have emerged.

Though multitasking has resulted in growing amounts of media consumption by U.S. adults, there will come a point where additional media consumption is not possible because people need to work, eat, sleep and commute to work.

We might be nearing that point, where growth will stop and gains by one type of media will have to come at the expense of others.

On average, U.S. residents interact with media for 12 hours, 5 minutes each day.

But the daily total is expected to grow by just three minutes between 2016 and 2018. That is going to intensify competition between media formats, since, in a zero sum game, a contestant can win only if another contestant loses.


Sunday, June 5, 2016

Will a 3rd Mobile Operator Ever Try to Attack the Philippines Mobile Market?

Reasonable people--not to mention communications regulators--might well agree that duopolies, though better than monopolies--do not always deliver the benefits of competition in a robust way. That is not to say there is no competition: typically there is rather serious competition.

There simply is not the degree of disruption that happens when a third strong player enters a market.

So it is that some question the wisdom of San Miguel Corp. selling its spectrum assets to Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. and Globe Telecom, the two dominant providers in the Philippines telecom market.

The deal raises more than $1 billion for San Miguel, and both PLDT and Globe acquired half of the assets.

The two operators, which together have a 99 percent market share of mobile connections, will pay a total of PHP52.8 billion ($1.13 billion) for assets including 700MHz spectrum.

Though San Miguel had tried to launch its own mobile business, it eventually decided to sell its spectrum assets to the two dominant providers, after failing to secure a needed operating  partner. In that regard, San Miguel had negotiated for a year with Telstra, but could not reach an agreement.

The Foundation for Economic Freedom  has urged the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) to review the deal.

“The PCC should take into account that it is mandated by Republic Act No. 10667 or the Philippine Competition Act to implement the national competition  policy and prohibit anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and merger or acquisition agreements that substantially prevent, restrict or lessen competition in the market,” FEF said.

About 20 MHz of 700-MHz spectrum apparently will be returned to the government for eventual auction, to encourage market entry by a third competitor.

That might not be so easy. Japan and South Korea also have been trying to encourage a third provider to enter their mobile markets, and have been repeatedly unsuccessful. One might guess that potential entrants see little chance of significantly cutting into the market share of the leaders in those markets.

That appears to have been the case in the Philippines as well.

IoT Forecasts are Wrong, History Suggests

All present “Internet of Things” forecasts are likely to be wrong, and wrong on the high side, especially in the early years. That simply is the pattern when new technologies and markets emerge. 

Almost always, when new technology is adopted, expectations are too high for the early deployments, but often too low in the later years.

There is a chance the forecasts will be correct in terms of magnitude, but wrong in terms of timing. 

A complicating matter is that different definitions are used, either inflating or deflating the estimates. Some of the confusion is understandable. The broad notion of devices connected to the Internet makes sense.

But some major categories of devices fitting that definition by excluded, to avoid confusion. Internet-connected phones, PCs and tablets are generally excluded. Mostly everything else is included.

Even so, the number of product categories and functions is diverse enough to confuse most of us, most of the time, about where the growth exists.

Eventually, we will reach some common understanding. But possibly not soon.

Present estimates of IoT deployment vary widely, in part because definitions vary.

There might be 35 billion to 50 billion IoT devices in use by 2020. But the higher estimate often includes smartphones, tablets and personal computers (devices that many do not consider IoT devices).

If that is the case, even the more-conservative forecasts--all other trends developing as forecast--are too high, because they include many billions of "non-IoT" devices. And even if the forecasts prove correct in terms of magnitude, they are likely to prove wrong in terms of timing.

The market will take far longer to develop, than many seem to anticipate.



Precisely which segments will develop first, and substantially, is a big unknown. Some seem to believe consumer wearables or connected home appliances will lead; others think business devices will drive most of the adoption. Yet others think "government-mandated" apps, devices and connections will lead.

By some estimates, the industrial IoT might already have largely arrived. The bad news for industrial IoT proponents is that, if that is correct, industrial IoT growth will not be so robust as many expect, and most of the deployments will happen in the consumer appliances area. That largely is driven by home automation or home security apps.


Others think the volume of deployments will be by businesses and governments (“smart city” apps, broadly defined).




Saturday, June 4, 2016

Virtualized Networks Will Disrupt Supplier Business Models

The shift to virtualized networks, as you would expect, will disrupt the telecom infrastructure supplier market. That pattern already is happening in the data center market as well, as open source, virtualized and “do it yourself” approaches to data center infrastructure have taken hold.  

"Part of the challenge for the vendors is that it certainly upset the vendor business model, because instead of buying boxes we were now going to buy software and buy it in smaller chunks, and we've been vocal about having open source play a key role in the ecosystem," says Krish Prabhu, AT&T CTO.

More is coming. The Telecom Infra Project, initiated by Facebook but now supported by a number of leading telecom infrastructure suppliers, also is working to essentially commoditize hardware and create more functionality on an open and “computing-style model.”  

The project aims to to “develop new technologies and approaches to building and deploying telecom network infrastructure,” according to Jay Parikh, Facebook global head of engineering and infrastructure.

Facebook, Intel, and Nokia have pledged to contribute an initial suite of reference designs, while other members such as operators Deutsche Telekom and SK Telecom will help define and deploy the technology as it fits their needs, said Parikh.

Telecom Infra Project  members will work together to contribute designs in three areas including  access, backhaul, and core and management.

Significantly, the effort will apply Open Compute Project models of openness and disaggregation as methods of spurring innovation. In other words, in addition to relying on open source, the Project also will rely on use of standard, “commodity” hardware.

“In what is a traditionally closed system, component pieces will be unbundled, affording operators more flexibility in building networks,” Parikh says.

The net result is that telecom networks will cost less in the future. Not only are service providers moving to adopt virtualized approaches to network gear, with firms such as Facebook pushing that model, but rival platforms, including cable TV networks and coming fixed wireless and mobile networks already are suggesting that lower-cost access models are possible.

The AT&T  Domain 2.0 program, based on use of software-defined networks (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV), is part of that shift.

Friday, June 3, 2016

India Authorizes MVNOs, Will New Business Models Emerge?

Allowing operation of  mobile virtual network operators in the Indian mobile market will be a game changer, says Ravi Shankar Prasad, Communications, and IT minister.

Others are not so sure, given the intensely-competitive nature of the Indian mobile market and the entry of Reliance Jio into the market.

Perhaps paradoxically, the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India believes the new MVNOs will primarily focus on services for customers in rural areas, since that is an underserved niche.

Much could depend on the full details of the enabling regulations, which appear to allow a significant amount of owned facilities, though MVNOs will not be allowed to be assigned spectrum by the underlying carriers or build or least their own “core network” facilities.

It is not immediately clear whether MVNOs will be allowed to separately acquire spectrum.
The definitions will matter.

In any scenario, it appears India could be part of a new  trend for MVNO business models.

Traditionally, MVNOs have rented virtually everything they need from an underlying carrier, without building their own facilities or acquiring spectrum.

But new possibilities are emerging as cable TV operators, for example, explore “Wi-Fi first” models that are a blend of rented capacity and owned infrastructure.

So the interesting angle in India will be whether new forms of wholesale services and owned facilities will emerge.

For example, would a fiber connection from a village to the furthest optical node operated by an existing facilities-based mobile operator be considered “core” or facilities allowed under the rules for MVNOs?

That, of course, assumes MVNOs can own their towers, radios and associated infrastructure, something that typically is not part of the MVNO licensing regime in other countries. But such nuances would not be new.

As in the past, the difference between resellers and MVNOs was sometimes hard to define with precision. In some cases, the distinction turned on such nuances as whether the MVNO had its own billing system, while a reseller used the underlying carrier’s billing system.

So, too, might the difference between an MVNO and a facilities-based mobile operator become a bit more porous.

Will Generative AI Follow Development Path of the Internet?

In many ways, the development of the internet provides a model for understanding how artificial intelligence will develop and create value. ...