As policymakers and service providers ponder the implications of a future “shut down” of the public switched telephone network, they will face a new series of questions.
Since the robustness of investment in new networks will hinge on expectations about profits, many of the questions will flow directly from the more challenging business model. As the regulatory framework had to change in the shift from a monopoly model to a competitive model, so the framework arguably will have to change again with a shift to all-IP networks.
When service providers worry about the implications fo “dumb pipe” or “over the top” business models, they simply acknowledge a key change in the foundation of the networks business, namely that network access and applications now are logically distinct.
Whatever else might be said, it is obvious that “certainty” is not a key feature of the fixed network business anymore. That’s a problem since uncertainty is the enemy of investment.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Questions About Investment Return for IP Networks as PSTN Shutdown is Pondered
Gary Kim was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes, ranked second in the world for coverage of the mobile business, and as a "top 10" telecom analyst. He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top two percent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes, Follow the Data. Even if it Does Not Fit Your Agenda
When people argue we need to “follow the science” that should be true in all cases, not only in cases where the data fits one’s political pr...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment