At least so far, no firm that has dominated one era of computing technology has had similar leadership in the following era. This comparison has to be seen in context, given the huge run up in equity values during the "dot com" years.
The best illustration is the drop in equity value of AOL, which mostly reflects a drastic change in market valuation, not the underlying fundamentals of the business.
Still, the equity valuation of Apple, Google and Facebook in 2013 tells you something about perceptions of leadership a decade after the peak of the Internet bubble in 2001.
Monday, August 26, 2013
The Difference Between 2000 and 2013
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Will AI Actually Boost Productivity and Consumer Demand? Maybe Not
A recent report by PwC suggests artificial intelligence will generate $15.7 trillion in economic impact to 2030. Most of us, reading, seein...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment