Do businesses and consumers in the United States need one more fourth-generation nationwide wireless network, aside from the existing Clearwire, soon-to-be-built Verizon and AT&T networks, as well as regional networks being created by regional mobile providers and cable companies, not to mention high-speed 3G networks running at top speeds of 22 Mbps?
Though no firm answer can be given to that question, we might find out relatively soon whether investors think there is a need for another facilities-based 4G network of national coverage.
Harbinger Capital, which recently merged with SkyTerra, proposes to build a fully integrated satellite-terrestrial network to serve North American mobile users, with a national 4G terrestrial network covering 260 million people by the end of 2013.
The planned network would launch before the third quarter of 2011 and cover nine million people, with trials set initially for Denver and Phoenix. The next milestone is that 100 million people have to be covered by the end of 2012, 145 million by the end of 2013 and at least 260 million people in the United States by the end of 2015. Harbinger told the FCC that all major markets will be installed by the end of the second quarter of 2013.
The original thinking has been that wireless services within a number of vertical markets that are highly dependent upon the ubiquitous coverage and redundancy to be provided by its satellite network would be the core of the business strategy. But Harbinger might think there is a market broader than that as well.
Harbinger actually is required by the Federal Communications Commission to provide wholesale access to third parties, and also to restrict total Verizon Wireless and AT&T traffic to no more than 25 percent of total, to provide more competition in the market.
The big issue is whether there is substantial need for additional spectrum at this point. One might argue that industry requests, as well as FCC proposals, for allocation of an additional 500 megaHertz of spectrum for mobile broadband are clear evidence of need.
But there are other issues of market structure and competition. Assuming hundreds of new megaHertz of spectrum can eventually be relocated, most observers think the buyers of such spectrum would be the largest mobile providers such as AT&T and Verizon.
The Harbinger network, by definition, would largely be a platform for other providers, as it would operate as a wholesale provider.
The key business issue is whether there actually is sufficient business demand for another national 4G terrestrial network, though. Sprint and Clearwire both have relatively lavish amounts of spectrum already, and both have shown a willingness to sell wholesale capacity.
One might argue the key differentiator would be the satellite roaming features that would be available on handsets that normally default to the terrestrial network. But the bigger test will be of investor sentiment, as Harbinger will have to raise billions to build the new terrestrial network.
The 36,000 base stations that Harbinger plans to use, along with the tower sites, backhaul and other gear associated with a terrestrial network will require billions of dollars worth of investment.
Analyst Chris King at Stifel Nicolaus estimates that Verizon’s LTE network will cost about $5 billion to deploy. Clearwire has also spent billions on its network, with analyst estimates ranging from $3 billion to about $6 billion. There is no particular reason to think the ubiquitous terrestrial network Harbinger expects to build would cost less.
Investors will have to be found first, before there is a chance to test the thesis that another facilities-based 4G network is needed.
