Most Computing Now Requires Communication

Communications have been important for some enterprise data communications since the days of mainframes, but computing now fundamentally relies on communications, making the old phrases "computing and communications" or "information and communications technology" a functional reality underpinning nearly all computing instances and workloads.

In early mainframe days, only a relatively few businesses required communications support for their computing needs. But communications gradually has become a foundational requirement for computing.

Telcos in the 1950s began using their own networks for internal purposes, eventually creating the T1 standard for data communications in 1958.

Communications arguably became more important for computing with the development of ARPANET in the 1960s, with the emergence of Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol in the 1970s, and in the 1980s the ability to use dial-up telephone networks to support ARPANET.

Communications became even more important in the 1990s with the invention of the World Wide Web and the emergence in the 2000s of the Internet and WWW as staples of consumer experience.

The smartphone and the web illustrate the centrality of communications for computing, as remote computing requires communications. A similar observation can be made about business and enterprise computing, which now also relies on remote server access and public and private cloud computing.

So it should come as no surprise that public cloud spend is quickly becoming a significant new line item in information technology budgets, especially among larger companies, a survey sponsored by RightScale suggests. 

Among all respondents, 23 percent spend at least $2.4 million annually ($200,000 per month) on public cloud while 33 percent are spending at least $1.2 million per year ($100,000 per month). 

Among enterprises the spend is even higher, with 38 percent exceeding $2.4 million per year and half (50 percent) above $1.2 million per year. 

Small and medium businesses generally have fewer workloads overall and, as a result, smaller cloud bills (just over half spend under $120,000 per year). However, 11 percent of SMBs still exceed $1.2 million in annual spend, RightScale says. 

source: RightScale 

Enterprise respondents run 79 percent of workloads in cloud, with 38 percent of workloads in public cloud and 41 percent in private cloud. Workloads running in private cloud may include workloads running in existing virtualized environments or bare-metal environments that have been “cloudified,” says RightScale. 

Non-cloud computing comprises about 21 percent of respondent workloads. 

Small and mid-sized businesses report running 43 percent of workloads using public cloud and also run 35 percent of workloads on private cloud. Some 22 percent of workloads remains on non-cloud platforms. 

source: RightScale

Western Union Partners with Airtel for Mobile Payments

Western Union is partnering with Bharti Airtel to launch real-time mobile payments in India and across 14 countries in Africa, using Airtel Payments Bank and Airtel Africa.

Airtel Payments Bank customers will soon be able to direct a Western Union money transfer into their bank accounts 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Global senders can use Western Union’s digital services in 75 countries plus territories, or the walk-in Agent network across more than 200 countries and territories.

The collaboration with Airtel Africa will enable more than 15 million Airtel Money mobile wallet users in Nigeria, Uganda, Gabon, Tanzania, Zambia, DRC, Malawi, Madagascar, Kenya, Congo, Niger, Tchad, Rwanda and Seychelles to simply route any money transfer received from across the world into their wallets. 

It will also allow senders around the world to push funds directly to an Airtel Money mobile wallet in real-time and store value or pay for goods and services. Service launch is expected in 2020.

India is the world’s largest remittance-receiving country, according to the World Bank.

Australian Connectivity Prices Dropped in 2019

Between 2018 and 2019, Australian consumer connectivity prices dropped: down 1.5 percent for fixed network internet access; lower by 6.6 percent for mobile subscriptions and minus 16.4 percent for mobile broadband prices, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. 

source: ACCC

As always, methodology matters. The most basic approach for creating a price index is to measure the change in prices from one year to the next in an average price of a basket of products. 

There is a problem with this basic approach, the ACCC notes. If rapid increases in technology are improving the quality of the products,  then the increases in prices should not be interpreted as price inflation because the price changes partly reflect changes to the product. 

In other words, product quality changes also must be considered. That includes changes in usage allowances or access speeds, for example. It therefore is possible that specific plans might cost more, but represent better value.

Frontier Communications Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

When the world began to deregulate and privatize telecommunications, a new question arose: what would happen if an incumbent service provider proved unable to compete, and was forced out of business? 

Around the turn of the century we saw many bankruptcies of non-dominant service providers, especially those providing long distance capacity services. Since then we have seen a few restructurings of smaller legacy service providers, among them Windstream. 

Now it appears Frontier Communications will enter bankruptcy under laws that allow it to shed debt but continue operating. 

Since national governments consider their core communications facilities to be “national assets” in a real sense, it still seems quite a remote possibility that a failed national service provider would really be allowed to go out of business. 

In many countries, there is more than one service provider which plausibly could continue to serve a whole nation, even if a single major provider went out of business. 

Still, the possible bankruptcy of a former national telco remains a possibility unimaginable a few decades ago. 

Why the Need for "Agility?"

Agility, an organization’s ability to rapidly respond to change, is a highly-recommended organizational capability. Like all such recommended business values, agility arguably matters most when markets are changing substantially and rapidly; when competition is fierce; when customers and their demand have evolved.

In fact, agility is most important for industries and firms that have faced deregulation, globalization and internet-based competition. That applies almost classically to the telecom industry, which many would argue must replace half its current revenue every decade. 

That might seem unlikely, but is a simple reflection of the fact that product cycles exist for every communications product, as such cycles exist for every product.

source: University of Michigan Information and Technology Services

Microsoft gets cited as a firm that managed to create a culture of agility, arguably leading to an ability to adapt to a changing market. The point, to be clear, is business results. 

source: Yahoo Finance

For South Korean FTTH, Definitions Matter

Sometimes definitions matter; sometimes they are less relevant. In the U.S. market, it does not much matter whether access media is fiber to the premises or hybrid fiber coax or wireless. The issue is how much bandwidth consumers can buy, and at what cost, irrespective of access media.

In the South Korean internet access market, one is confronted by apparently contradictory statistics: fiber to premises supply is quite high, but take rates for fiber to home services is relatively low. 

On one hand, fiber to the premises is said to reach 80 percent to 98 percent of locations. On the other hand, take rates are said to be as low as 10 percent, 38 percent or as high as 98 percent. 

The other issue is speed. Just because a connection uses optical fiber media does not mean the supplied services run at especially high speeds. Some telcos that installed FTTH systems back in the late 1990s were supplying service at 10 Mbps. In South Korea, in 2017, average FTTH speeds were as low as 29 Mbps. 

In 2019, according to Ookla, South Korea average internet access speeds were about 144 Mbps downstream. 

source: FTTH Council Asia Pacific

So something odd has to be explained: FTTH supply is quite high, and yet average speeds are perhaps lower than one might expect. That explanation probably has to rely on the high percentage of multiple dwelling units in South Korea. 

Apartments represent perhaps 52 percent to 60 percent of dwellings in South Korea, and arguably is as high as 70 percent in Seoul. And that is likely a key to understanding the data. By definition, an optical fiber connection to a high-rise building goes into the basement, with actual end user access over a copper connection. 

source: FTTH Council Asia Pacific

In a strict sense, one might argue that the actual end user connection therefore uses copper cables, not optical fiber.

Slow Revenue Growth Remains Key Industry Problem

Revenue growth continues to be the big connectivity industry issue, with key markets looking at one percent to two percent annual revenue increases, according to S&P Global. 

source: S&P Global

Microsoft Plans to be Carbon Negative

By 2030 Microsoft will be carbon negative, and by 2050 Microsoft will remove from the environment all the carbon the company has emitted either directly or by electrical consumption since it was founded in 1975, Microsoft says. 

Microsoft aims to  cut its carbon emissions by more than half by 2030, “both for our direct emissions and for our entire supply and value chain,” the firm says. “We will fund this in part by expanding our internal carbon fee, in place since 2012 and increased last year, to start charging not only our direct emissions, but those from our supply and value chains.”

It also is noteworthy that Microsoft intends to ground its efforts in “ongoing scientific advances and an accurate reliance on the basic but fundamental mathematical concepts involved.”

How Well is U.S. Fixed Network Business Doing?

In the U.S. market, there is a fairly clear bifurcation between fixed network connectivity providers doing relatively well, and those which are not doing so well, even if an argument can be made that the segment as a whole is challenged. 

Tier-one cable operators are generating more revenue and profits from their wireline operations than most telcos are. Large tier-one telcos are doing better than smaller telcos. But AT&T fixed network revenue is slowly declining. 

Verizon fixed network revenue also has been declining slowly. 

source: Verizon

The broader traditional telco market is doing less well, as revenue is dropping. 

S&P Global Ratings

Cable internet service revenue growth arguably exceeds telco growth, which is flat to negative. And cable revenue from fixed network operations is growing. “Overall, we expect top-line growth of about five percent with weighted average margins improving by about 50 bps to approach 39 percent, S&P Global estimates. 

S&P Global Ratings

“We believe cable companies can continue to increase high-margin broadband revenue for the next two years through a combination of subscriber growth and higher prices as subscribers demand faster internet speeds with rising data consumption,” says S&P Global. “We expect that the average number of broadband subscribers will increase by about four percent in 2020.”

S&P Global Ratings

WAN Costs Might be a Bigger Edge Computing Driver than Latency

By 2025, perhaps 75 percent of enterprise data will be generated outside enterprise data centers or cloud data centers, according to Cisco. 

While today only 10 percent of all data is handled at the edge, analysts expect in three years between 50 percent and 75 percent of all data to be produced and processed at the edge,” said Paul Morgan, Global Sales for Manufacturing, Automotive & IoT, at HP Enterprise (HPE).  “Gartner puts the figure at 75 percent.”

And even if latency is an issue for some edge applications, conrtainment of bandwidth costs also matters. If much of that data can be processed locally, wide area network bandwidth costs are lower.

Spectrum Per Customer Matters

One always has to take marketing claims with a grain of salt. So it is with U.S. mobile operator spectrum holdings.

AT&T recently has claimed a dramatic lead in low-band spectrum. This chart shows why AT&T makes the claim. 

AT&T has about 176 MHz worth of low-band and mid-band spectrum, compared to Verizon’s 117 Mhz, Sprint’s 212 Mhz, T-Mobile’s 11o MHz and Dish Network’s 92 MHz. 

Of course, Verizon and AT&T have the most subscribers, so bandwidth per subscriber is less than for Sprint, T-Mobile US or Dish Network. 

source: Wells Fargo Securities

The “spectrum per subscriber” picture is different, though, because one also has to factor in the network load. Operators with more customers "need" more spectrum. And since Verizon and AT&T have "most of the customers," that should affect spectrum available "per customer."

source: Mobile Experts

Spectrum holdings matter, of course. But subscriber loading also matters. Looked at on a bandwidth per subscriber basis, AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile US are not far apart. Only Sprint has an unusually high amount of spectrum. Dish Network has not launched yet, and will be starting with modest network loading, so it should have relatively high spectrum per customer.

Verizon has 35 percent share of subscriptions. AT&T has 34 percent market share. So those two service providers have a combined 69 percent share of market. T-Mobile US has 17.5 percent share, while Sprint has about 12 percent share, according to Statista.

5G Subscription Forecasts Suggest Asia Will Lead

Market forecasts always are contingent on one’s assumptions, and that is no different for 5G subscription forecasts. It would take a brave leap or unusual definition to conclude anything other than that Asia will have the greatest number of 5G connections in the future, simply because Asia has the most people and the most mobile subscribers. 

Juniper Research anticipates that over 75 percent of global 5G connections will be in the Far East and China. This is due to the early launches in South Korea by all tier one operators, which was followed by significant launches of commercial 5G networks in China. 

GlobalData, on the other hand, suggests that Asia will account for about 65 percent of global 5G subscriptions by 2024 and about 44 percent of revenue. North America will account for 32 percent of revenue by 2024.

At the end of 2019, there were an estimated 4.5 million 5G users in the Far East, roughly 80 percent of the global total, nearly all of them in South Korea, Juniper Research estimates. 

But Juniper also predicts the United States and South Korea will be the fastest adopters of 5G, with 75 percent of all 5G subscribers attributable to these two countries by the end of 2020. That does not make sense to me, but that is what Juniper says. 

By 2025, Asia will still have more than 60 percent of 5G connections, Ericsson predicts. 

source: Ericsson

Is Structural Separation Still Relevant?

Australia, New Zealand and Singapore are among nations that have instituted a structurally separated telecom network environment, especially regarding the legacy national telecom networks. 

Infrastructure sharing is a more common trend, as when mobile operators agree to share the cost of cell towers. 

Municipal broadband networks represent a similar effort to create more competition, or higher-quality consumer services, using a wholesale approach where one entity builds and operates the network, and any number of retail providers are allowed to use the network to create their own retail efforts.

Compared to two decades ago, there seems less talk about structural separation as a method for either increasing capital investment or limiting the cost of such investment. Municipal networks, building brand new facilities, seems to be the bigger trend in some markets, such as the United States. 

While it might be too early to draw final conclusions, there already is some mixed evidence of the value of such decisions. Some three decades ago, I was part of a study team looking at a proposal by Rochester Telephone Company to divest its local communications monopoly, creating a wholesale framework, in return for which RTC would be granted freedom to enter the long distance business, at that point.

Rochester Telephone won permission from state regulators to split into separate companies: a regulated wholesaler of telephone services named Rochester Telephone Corp. and an unregulated retailer named Frontier Communications of Rochester.

After approval, RTC become Frontier Corp. in 1995. In August 1995 Frontier Corp. merged with ALC Communications Corp., acquiring in that move Confer Tech International, the world's largest dedicated multimedia teleconferencing company. 

Later in the year Frontier acquired LINK-VTC, a videoconferencing services company. A month earlier, Frontier had purchased Schneider Communications Inc., a long-distance voice and data carrier, and its 81 percent interest in LinkUSA Corp., a long-distance services provider, for $127 million. 

Other 1995 acquisitions were WCT Communications, a West Coast long-distance company; Enhanced TeleManagement, Inc., offering integrated telecommunications services in six states; American Sharecom, Inc., a Minneapolis-based long-distance company; and Minnesota Southern Cellular Telephone Co. Frontier also established its first international subsidiary for integrated services, London-based FronTel Communications Ltd.

In 1999 the company was acquired by Global Crossing. In 2001, Global Crossing North America's local exchange assets, including Frontier Telephone of Rochester and Frontier Subsidiary Telco, and ownership of the Frontier name were sold to Citizens Communications Company, which in 2008 renamed itself Frontier Communications.

I have no idea how well the wholesale model actually has worked out in the former Rochester Telephone service area, but it is not clear to me that competition or investment has been significantly different after the structural separation. 

If I had to guess I’d say the emergence of Charter Communications as a telecom services supplier has had more impact on prices and the quality of service than the structural separation.

AT&T Acqusitions Still Controversial, if Necessary

It never is hard to find critics of the Time Warner acquisition or DirecTV before that. While acknowledging that DirecTV has underperformed expectations, one can make the argument that the cash flow advantages still outperformed other assets AT&T might have acquired. 

Organic revenue growth often is tough, and a firm such as AT&T requires huge amounts of free cash flow to support its dividend payments, debt reduction and capital investment needs. Sure, the video entertainment business is changing. But you would be hard pressed to name any other acquisitions AT&T might have made that boosted free cash flow as much as DirecTV. 

Also, AT&T could not have afforded many other high-growth, high cash producing assets that were substantial enough to move the free cash flow needle. Even if mobility and business services produce higher profit margins, AT&T was not in position to acquire more mobile market share, because of antitrust concerns. 

Nor is it clear whether any business segment assets could be acquired domestically or internationally that would be big enough to move the cash flow needle, and also fit a strategic rationale. 

Keep in mind that AT&T always has grown principally by acquisition; only then secondarily by organic growth. Also, there are relatively few consumer services that are highly purchased, and video entertainment is one of those. 

The right declining businesses can throw off lots of free cash flow, and might serve as a foundation to create a next generation of products that have growth prospects. AT&T was betting this would be the case with DirecTV. 

Still, free cash flow is a big driver of AT&T thinking. Sure, now debt reduction is a priority, but that happens when a company’s growth strategy virtually requires big acquisitions.