Hollywood Tries One More Way to Embrace Streaming Without Cannibalizing Legacy Business

Lots of people are hoping that streaming and over the top delivery of professional content will somehow lead not only to more "on demand" access, but somehow lead to lower prices. That might happen, but not if content owners and distributors have success creating "sell through" requirements that link streaming to purchase of legacy products.

The "Ultraviolet" initiative is one more example. Some have dubbed the streaming service the “Giant Media DRM Cloud Coalition Featuring Everyone Except Apple and Disney and Amazon."

The service allows users to buy movies first on DVD or Blu-Ray, providing a code that will let users stream or download the film on other devices, like iPads, Android phones and laptops. Hollywood Hopes "Ultraviolet" Will Save DVDs

Nearly 7 Percent of U.S. Content is Consumed on Mobile Devices

U.S. consumers are increasingly connecting to digital content using a variety of devices such as smart phones, tablets and other mobile devices. In August 2011, the share of non-computer traffic for the U.S. increased to 6.8 percent from just 6.2 percent at the end of the previous quarter.

The largest percentage from this share came from mobile devices, which drove 4.4 percent of total digital traffic in the U.S.

The second largest driver of non-computer traffic was the tablet category, contributing nearly two percent of total traffic. Nearly 7 Percent of U.S. digital content now consumed on mobiles

Marketing is Business Driver for Mobile Wallets

Possibly the most meaningful impact that Google Wallet will have is on the advertising and marketing communities. Google offers will be Google’s application for deals, coupons, and offers that will inform you of promotions based on your location.

In that sense, the business case for mobile wallet apps will be location based advertising, the ability to view and compare the deals of local vendors, and coupons that do not have to be cut out of magazines or newspapers.

Local-targeted advertising will sound like Living Social and Groupon, and that's essentially correct.

Google shows mobile "payment" is about marketing

Is Information Technology Like Railroads? If So, What Does That Mean?

For those of you who believe the Internet will be a transforming technology, it might also be helpful to keep in mind that such transformations can be hugely unsettling, and take quite a long time to become obvious.

Still, there is something out of character with job growth coming out of the last handful of recoveries from recessions.

What we historically expect to see is a sort of "shark fin" pattern of job growth. Since 2000, though the fin was almost non-existent after the early 2000s recession.

It is an inverse fin after the "recovery" from the 2008 recession. Does that relate to a broader economic transformation? If so, we are in for a jarring, unpleasant ride, in the medium term.

In 1850, a decade before the Civil War, the United States’ economy was small, in fact not much bigger than Italy’s. Forty years later, it was the largest economy in the world. What happened in-between was the railroads.

Deep changes like this are not unusual. Every so often—every 60 years or so—a body of technology comes along and over several decades, quietly, almost unnoticeably, transforms the economy and creates a different world for business. So the issue is whether mobility, applications and the Internet might be such a wave. The second economy

If so, the changes will take decades to play out.

If something that big is going on with information technology, something that goes well beyond the use of computers, social media, and commerce on the Internet, a second economy is being built. But there will be casualties. When the shift of developed economies "from farm to factory" occurred, there was widespread dislocation. Think of the United Kingdom in the mid-1980s, "A Christmas Carol" and all that.

In the early 20th century, U.S. farm jobs became mechanized and there was less need for farm labor, and some decades later manufacturing jobs became mechanized and there was less need for factory labor.

Now business processes—many in the service sector—are becoming “mechanized” and fewer people are needed, and this is exerting systematic downward pressure on jobs. We don’t have paralegals in the numbers we used to. Or draftsmen, telephone operators, typists, or bookkeeping people.

A lot of that work is now done digitally. We do have police and teachers and doctors; where there’s a need for human judgment and human interaction, we still have that. But the primary cause of all of the downsizing we’ve had since the mid-1990s is that a lot of human jobs are disappearing into the second economy. Not to reappear.

Perhaps that is why recoveries from recessions starting in 2000 have been so different.

What Kindle Fire Means for Telcos

The Amazon Kindle Fire launch, with the simultaneous release of three new versions of the Kindle designed more as e-readers, likely illustrates a fundamental change in consumer electronics ecosystems, just as the application ecosystem also has changed around smart phones.

Needless to say, network access providers also face the need to create entirely new businesses based on partners of various types, all working within a larger context where devices, applications, commerce, advertising and cloud-based applications all are essential parts of the value consumers and businesses pay for.

The content and communications businesses these days are fundamentally different from those same businesses of 30 years ago in one fundamental way. Unlike the situation several decades ago, when value almost completely could be controlled by vertically-integrated providers, value now is derived from loosely coupled ecosystems.

In other words, where a telco in the past could control and vertically integrate every part of the “voice delivery” business, these days network-delivered applications with high value can be delivered to end users (both business and consumer) without any formal business relationship with an access provider. Razorsight | Corporate Blog

U.S. Consumers Not Convinced they Need Mobile Payments

A new survey finds that most U.S. consumers are not eagerly awaiting mobile payments. Lightspeed Research surveyed 10,000 credit card customers, including some 2,400 smartphone users, and found that half of those with smartphones described the ability to make mobile payments as "very unimportant" to them. Americans greet mobile payments with a yawn


Only 15 percent of those surveyed said mobile payment was very or somewhat important. The findings should come as no surprise. The payments process is not broken. Cash, check, credit and debit card payments are well understood, reliable, safe and easy to use.

On the other hand, there appear to be brighter prospects for new types of credit cards co-branded with daily deal sites. The Lightspeed research reveals that more than one quarter (27 percent) of Living Social customers would be interested in a Living Social-branded credit card, while more than one third (34 percent) of Groupon customers would be interested in a Groupon-branded card. 

Further, the research determined that daily deal customers’ creditworthiness and overall spending behaviors make them an attractive target from a credit product standpoint. Relative to the overall U.S. credit cardholder population, Groupon and Living Social customers are lucrative. Life for credit card

Users of the two leading daily deal services are about 50 percent more likely to have household incomes above $75,000, have higher credit scores, make three times as many credit card purchases and are about twice as likely to pay their monthly credit card balances in full. 

Steve Jobs Plans: How Far Do They Go?

Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Jobs reportedly left behind plans for four more years worth of Apple products when he died last week.

The Daily Mail reported over the weekend that Jobs worked for the last year of his life on a plan for more products to ensure his Cupertino company's success after his death.

The report cites unnamed Apple sources who said that while he knew his end was near, Jobs was outlining new versions of the iPad, iPhone, iPods and Macbooks, as well as working on iCloud, the automatic remote backup of photos, music and other files.

Apple does not pre-announce what it is working on, so those reports, though having the ring of authenticity, do not make clear whether Apple now has plans only to tweak its existing products, or whether there is some additional roadmap for products that could create whole new markets, something Steve Jobs uniquely was able to do.

That's the big issue for Apple. Its ability to manage its current business is not really in doubt. The issue is whether Apple in the future can create additional brand new markets without Steve Jobs. You might use the analogy of Disney. It has a profitable business long after its founder, Walt Disney, died. But you might also note that much of its recent success is due to ownership of the ABC network and its properties, such as ESPN.

It is harder to see how Disney, without Walt Disney, has "created" and "innovated" in quite the same way without Walt Disney.

Steve Jobs left plans for more from Apple