Jon Brokkin does a nice job of explaining peering and interconnection agreements between Internet service providers can interfere with user experience.
There are business issues of several types, some related to revenue models, others related to the more-prosaic details of how carriers historically have compensated each other for exchanging traffic.
Disputes between ISPs over settlement-free interconnection sometimes directly resemble the disputes between cable companies and programming networks over new contract terms, and generally for the same reason: money earned by one of the parties, and money paid by one of the parties.
Read it here. Often, one of the parties to such a dispute tries to position a dispute as an attack on network neutrality. It isn't. The disputes are about interconnection of networks. But that does not mean there are no business issues. Those issues can be genuine.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Network Interconnection Explained
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Will AI Fuel a Huge "Services into Products" Shift?
As content streaming has disrupted music, is disrupting video and television, so might AI potentially disrupt industry leaders ranging from ...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment