Thursday, March 5, 2009

The Outcome Might be Inescapable, But Plan on 20 Years

If the newspaper and magazine business model increasingly is "toast," is TV next? You will find no shortage of observers who say the answer is "yes;" that over time, more content will shift to some Internet-delivered modality. 

It might also be worth keeping in mind that transitions of this sort typically take decades. As a journalism graduate student I worked on a Gannett-funded project on the future of journalism education as electronic forms of media became more important. Keep in mind, the World Wide Web had not yet been invented at the time we conducted that exercise. 

I hate to admit it, but that was nearly 30 years ago. Only this year have we seen massive signs that the transition is hitting print media on a permanent basis. 

So the direction might be there, but the transition will take far longer than most expect. In fact, most technology-driven displacements of this sort take longer than most observers expect. If the Internet TV displacement follows the typical curve, progress will be far more stubborn than people expect, in the early years. And "early years" can last for decades. Once the inflection point is hit, change will occur faster than people expect, though.

For those of us who have been anticipating a major shift to electronic forms of all media for quite some time, it has taken quite a long time to get here. Now that we have, watch out. The structural change now will occur far more rapidly than anybody suspects. 

That you are reading this on a blog is but one example. 

I do not think it will take 30 years for stunning change to occur in the packaged, linear video business. But neither do I think anything other than relatively incremental changes in revenue volume will occur in the near term, if only because technology substitution, and the changes in industry structure technology enables, take time to unfold.

I do believe the inflection point for print media already has been reached, and do expect massive changes on a scale and pace most practitioners are not expecting. That is one reason why I began to shift gears two years ago. Well, maybe shifting gears is too incremental an analogy.  Jumping ship is the better, if imperfect, analogy. 

Somehow, I still find myself doing "print" content. But it is not the future. 

A similar inflection point for mainstream replacement of multi-channel video services by Internet replacements is far off, yet, even though we now can see the change coming. It might be inevitable or inescapable. It will not be transformative for some time to come, though. Think decades, not years. History suggests that is the right time frame.




No comments:

Many Winners and Losers from Generative AI

Perhaps there is no contradiction between low historical total factor annual productivity gains and high expected generative artificial inte...