BlackBerry App World Launches: Implications for Service Creation, Business Models Clear

Research In Motion has opened its new online application store, called BlackBerry App World, according to UPI. BlackBerry App World accepts PayPal for payments and starts prices at $2.99. That move might be an effort to screen apps for quality, something some believe is an issue for Apple's AppStore.

Price options also run up to $999, suggesting RIM will push high-end downloads through the store. To access the store, BlackBerry users will need to have a least a Version 4.2 operating system on their phones.

RIM appears to be negotiating back end revenue shares with vendors of applications that generate revenue through advertising or other means. It’s unclear what the share is, but language in developer contracts suggests that a revenue share is part of the model, Alec Saunders, Iotum CEO, notes.

The broad emergence of app stores, distributing or selling a wide variety of entertainment, utility or business apps, mostly Web related or data related rather than voice related, does raise some questions about the voice "service creation environment."

It is becoming possible to assemble apps rather than "create" them, using open and loosely-coupled processes. The problem would seem to be that "assembled" apps more nearly resemble the old "over-the-top" or loosely-coupled model rather than the high-availability, vertically-integrated model that has in the past been typical of voice applications.

There are obvious business model implications. Independent software developers and device manufacturers obviously participate in the revenue stream. It is less clear how access providers participate, and, if so, to what degree.

The longer-term implications are equally momentous. Up to this point the bulk of revenue has been generated by using "big iron" or "big code." And that might continue to be true for quite some time. Value, though, increasingly is realized by assembling new apps using building blocks essentially abstracted from the "big iron" or "big code" platforms.

That isn't to say that incremental "value" is equivalent to "revenue" in a linear way. Still, it is hard to see where the trajectory leads. To some extent, access, transport, computing, storage or basic features are--though not commodities--perhaps viewed as "table stakes." The new applications, though creating relatively small amounts of revenue, increasingly are viewed as the "secret sauce."

For service providers, there's a sort of inversion of value here. Most of the cost and even the value is provided by the basic infrastructure and connectivity. Yet the "sizzle" is coming from the new apps that represent little incremental revenue. The good news is that given enough sizzle, it will be easier to keep users using the "basic" features.