The conventional wisdom is that high-speed broadband access is becoming a commodity bought by consumers primarily on the basis of speed and price.
A recent survey by Parks Associates also showed that there is not all that much difference between consumer satisfaction with any of the broadband network types.
With cable modem service and digital subscriber line as the baseline, consumers said they were a bit more happy with fiber to the home, and a bit less happy with either satellite broadband or fixed wireless broadband.
So the differences are a matter of performance, or speed or price, right? Well, maybe, and maybe not.
The Parks Associates survey also found that consumers were more satisfied with any broadband service purchased as part of a bundle, less happy when broadband was purchased a la carte. Since the primary end user benefit from buying any bundle is the cost savings, one might conclude that consumer satisfaction has less to do with the technical parameters (speed and reliability) and mostly to do with "saving money."
Since satellite broadband and fixed wireless services rarely are purchased as part of a multi-service bundle, that fact alone would explain lower satisfaction with either satellite or fixed wireless services.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Is Broadband "Satisfaction" Directly Related to "Bundle" Savings?

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Internet and AI: It's "Different This Time"
Investors, as all humans, tend to see the future through the lens of the past. And the thinking that "it is different this time" t...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
No comments:
Post a Comment