While data traffic is growing, signaling traffic is outpacing actual mobile data traffic by 30 to 50 percent, if not higher, 4G Americas says. As another example, a web-based IM user may send a message but then wait a couple of seconds between messages. To preserve battery life, the smartphone moves into idle mode. When the user pushes another message seconds later, the device has to set up a signaling path again, 4G Americas notes in a new white paper.
For real-time Internet applications, the logical always-on connection between the
server and client is required, resulting in frequent or periodic small heartbeat packets to be sent as a keep-alive message to maintain the connection.
“Push” services and “always on” apps add more load. All of that is in addition to the “bearer” traffic. Heavy users of apps illustrate what could happen to network demand as “early adopter” or “heavy user” behaviors become more mainstream. Today, heavy video or audio streamers consume about 2 Gbytes a day worth of video, or 1 Gbyte each day for audio streaming.
In other words, optimizing a mobile network for bearer traffic is one issue, while optimizing for signaling traffic is a different problem.
General computing these days revolves around content consumption and sharing, and heavy users of social networks can consume 7.5 Gbytes a month up to about 14 Gbytes a month. Cloud storage, for early adopters, now ranges from less than a gigabyte a month, up to about 5.5 Gbytes a month.
Leading users of gaming can consume gigabytes a day. The upshot is that total U.S. data traffic could grow 47 times over the next five years, unless wi-fi offload is available. If Wi-Fi offload is available, demand grows by “only” 24 times over the next five years.
The point, 4G Americas suggests, is that improvements to network, device platform, and application design can all help alleviate capacity issues, but there can be no lasting success without understanding end user behavior.
There is no question that end users are using more and more data every year. In 2011, 44 percent of mobile subscribers owned smartphones, which is more than double the market penetration of two years.
According to Nielsen, more than 50 percent of U.S. mobile phone users now use smart phones, in the first quarter of 2012.
Between 2010 and 2011, the numbers of smartphone subscribers engaged in various rich media
activities other than mobile video have all grown by 45 percent or more. Numbers of subscribers
performing game downloads and playing online games both increased more than 80 percent each in the same year, Nielsen also has reported.
Friday, June 29, 2012
Mobile Signaling Growing 30% to 50% Faster than End User Traffic
Gary Kim has been a digital infra analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology, pre- and post-internet. He sees a similar evolution coming with AI. General-purpose technologies do not come along very often, but when they do, they change life, economies and industries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Will Generative AI Follow Development Path of the Internet?
In many ways, the development of the internet provides a model for understanding how artificial intelligence will develop and create value. ...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
One recurring issue with forecasts of multi-access edge computing is that it is easier to make predictions about cost than revenue and infra...
2 comments:
Do all those signaling packets count against a user's data cap? I assume the answer is "of course they do" but it would be nice to know for sure.
Actually, the answer is "sort of," but only in the sense that an email client "ping" looking for any new messages might result in those messages being downloaded, which do count against a usage cap. But as far as I know, the signaling overhead, as such, does not count against a usage cap.
Post a Comment