It's too early to contemplate an artificial intelligence "killer app." Indeed, some will be tempted to argue there will be lots of killer use cases, and less likely an identifiable killer app.
Indeed, that is characteristic of "general-purpose technologies" that affect whole economies.
GPTs are technologies that have the potential to transform multiple sectors and industries, such as the steam engine, electricity, and the internet. By definition, such technologies affect the entire economy.
Given the broad applicability and versatility of GPTs, it's unlikely that a single killer app would be the primary driver of adoption. Instead, GPTs often enable a wide range of innovative use cases across various industries.
The Internet: enabled e-commerce, online education, remote work, social media, and has affected the entire economy, virtually every industry to some extent and life in general.
Other compuing technologies which are not GPTs, also by definition, have some “killer app” or “killer use case” that drove mass adoption. The spreadsheet drove business adoption of personal computers, for financial modeling. Graphic design software (and desktop publishing) arguably propelled adoption of the Macintosh.
Word processing arguably drove widespread adoption of PCs by non-financial personnel. The web browser and World Wide Web’s multimedia capabilities spurred mass adoption of all sorts of visual, auditory and interactive applications (aided by broadband, which made visual content possible).
Computing “in your pocket or purse” drove smartphone adoption beyond business users whose killer app was mobile email access.
No comments:
Post a Comment