Service Providers Now Will Have to Contend with Decades of Belt-Tightening

As if forecasting telecom, cable and Internet spending were not hard enough, it is about to become much-more uncertain, for reasons most of us probably could never have expected: a decades-long suppression of end user consumption to re-balance structural deficits.

Developed countries with big budget deficits--including the United States--must start now to prepare public opinion for the belt-tightening that will be needed starting next year, John Lipsky, says International Monetary Fund first deputy managing director.

Gross general government debt in the advanced economies will rise from an average of 75 percent of gross domestic product at end-2007 to 110 percent of GDP at end-2014, even assuming that temporary, crisis-related stimulus steps are withdrawn in coming years.

Reducing the ratio to the pre-crisis average of 60 percent by 2030 would require raising the structural primary balance -- before interest payments -- from a deficit of about four percent of GDP in 2010 to a surplus of about four percent of GDP in 2020 and keeping it at that level for the following decade.

That clearly implies an eight percent swing in balances, before interest payments.

Lipsky also says the scale of the adjustment is so vast that less-generous health and pension benefits, government spending cuts and increased tax revenues are needed.

The drops in government services to individual citizens and businesses could be unprecedented, some therefore suggest.

The obvious danger is that the U.S. Congress seems hell-bent on making the problem worse by continuing to spend as though it had the means to pay for its spending. The IMF has for decades both scolded and disciplined developing nations unable to balance their budgets.

Now it appears the United States, for the first time, is headed that way as well. The ramifications are not entirely certain, but slower economic growth is likely and social strife virtually inevitable.

It is not immediately certain what all of this fundamental change will mean for providers of communication and other services to businesses and consumers, but it probably will a mixed impact.

If one assumes consumers will have less disposal income, one would expect pressure on overall revenues and profit margins. But consumers will also have to make choices about discretionary spending, and past behavior suggests that communications and entertainment services are high priorities.

All indications are that broadband access will become, with mobility, anchor and foundational services, the key issues for service providers being the cost of delivering those and other services, as well as creating a sustainable new role in the revenue chain for application usage.

It is not so clear what will happen to demand for today's packaged multi-channel video services. So far, mobile and online video usage seems incremental to other existing forms of video consumption, but much depends on what content owners decide is in their best long-term interests. Major change in distribution methods is possible, but not likely in the short term.

But businesses also will be forced to operate more frugally, which could have a variety of effects. In the recent recession business revenue dropped, except for providers taking market share.

The upshot is that most consumers will have less to spend, though. That could send the United States and other developed nations into a downward spiral where muted consumer activity undermines GDP growth.

The point is that our historical experiences with post-recession recoveries will be stressed in new ways this time around, specifically because the macro-economic stresses are so novel. The United States never before has had to be told by the IMF to adopt austerity measures, and people have not had to live through such a period.

But we are about to. And means everybody who tries to forecast revenue for telecom, cable and Internet companies, as well as others in the ecosystem, must face increased uncertainty. That doesn't necessarily mean the underlying assumptions will change. They might not. But it is not clear at the moment what could change, and we might not know for several years what the nature of those changes are.

Reuters article