Thursday, August 16, 2012

Which is the Bigger Cloud Opportunity, Business Process or Software "As a Service?"

It isn't clear whether software as a service or "business process as a service" is the biggest cloud computing opportunity. Gartner has in the past argued that SaaS is the biggest opportunity. But Gartner now seems to believe BPaaS is the single biggest opportunity.

"Major trends in client computing have shifted the market away from a focus on personal computers to a broader device perspective that includes smart phones, tablets and other consumer devices," says Steve Kleynhans, Gartner VP. "Emerging cloud services will become the glue that connects the web of devices that users choose to access during the different aspects of their daily life."

To be sure, there also are ramifications for enterprise users as well as consumers. And that explains the huge interest in cloud computing, on the part of service and application providers.

Still, most of the revenue upside appears likely to accrue to hardware and software suppliers, according to a Morgan Stanley analysis. In the telecom space, the analysts expect key winners to include Rackspace, Equinix and competitive local exchange carriers and metro bandwidth suppliers.

Also, pubic cloud computing is likely to reduce traditional telco enterprise service revenues. Morgan Stanley further suggests that among IT decision makers, the large telcos remain behind Amazon and others in terms of “cloud mindshare.”

How much overlap there is between hosting and cloud computing services is an important issue for service providers. At one level, hosting is about server real estate and amenities. But cloud computing is about some other things, namely rental of computing cycles and storage, rental of operating systems and platforms, and rental of actual business apps.

Though service providers have embraced the hosting business and content delivery networks as “valued added parts of the transport and business,” it remains unclear how far they might ultimately go in the core cloud computing business.

The increasing number of devices used by any single consumer to access and use cloud computing resources means more access revenue, to be sure.

Gartner predicts that, by 2014, the personal cloud will replace the personal computer at the center of users' digital lives. That implies heavy and growing need for broadband access.

What also is clear is that service providers now see content delivery networks and cloud computing as new business opportunities, with ramifications for enterprise users as well as consumers. And that explains the huge interest in cloud computing, on the part of service and application providers.

Still, most of the revenue upside appears likely to accrue to hardware and software suppliers, according to a Morgan Stanley analysis, even as enterprises start to shift workloads to cloud approaches.

According to the Morgan Stanley survey, 79 percent of information technology workloads are running at on-premise data centers today, but over the next few  years, respondents expect that only 64 percent of workloads will run at in-house data centers.

What’s more, 51 percent of respondents are running their entire infrastructure on premises today, but in three years some 70 percent of companies will have moved at least some workloads to managed hosting or public cloud environments, including infrastructure as a service, (IaaS), platform as a service, (Paas) or software as a service (SaaS).

That does not mean each of those ways of “doing cloud computing” represents the same amount of potential revenue for suppliers of the services. In the relatively near term, software as a service probably will represent most of the actual revenue for suppliers of cloud computing apps and services.

In fact, one might ask whether, on a global basis, cloud computing will be a significant revenue driver for anything but software as a service. According to Forrester Research, for example, by 2020 SaaS might represent $133 billion in annual revenue, while the other forms of cloud computing will register only in single-digit billions or low double digits.

In a similar way, some will argue that hosting and CDN services are more of a  “value add” for connectivity services, rather than big new revenue drivers for service providers, in their own right.

The issue is which cloud computing suppliers or even data centers will benefit, particularly since cloud computing services today are more logically provided by Amazon and other suppliers, not “data center” suppliers.

On the other hand, AT&T hopes to capitalize on its position as a “one-stop shop” for IT and connectivity needs. The company has said that it is already number two in hosting globally, with more than 2.5 million square feet of data center space (38 data centers, with 15 outside the US, primarily in Europe and Asia).

Verizon’s  purchase of Terremark likewise is expected to boost Verizon’s connectivity sales, not simply “hosting” revenue, especially with small and mid-sized businesses. Verizon operates 220 data centers in 23 countries, as well.

Metro fiber providers and independent hosting firms also will benefit, it is reasonable to conclude. What isn’t so clear at the moment is how much share telcos might gain in the IaaS, PaaS and SaaS business segments, which are less “real estate” plays and more “computing services” offers.

Cloud computing gets lots of attention these days in the service provider business. But it might be helpful to keep in mind that the actual amount of new revenue data center hosting or cloud computing actually will generate is likely to be modest, from a service provider perspective.

The more important angle is the “value add” for the other core connectivity solutions. Essentially, data center hosting services and content delivery networks "make the bits more valuable." And value is the antidote to commodity pricing.


The point is that although there are good reasons for service providers to see cloud computing as a viable and interesting new revenue stream, it is important to be careful and rational about the huge numbers one tends to see thrown around, related to cloud computing.

Gartner, for example, now expects enterprise spending on public cloud services to grow from $91 billion worldwide in 2011 to $109 billion in 2012, while by 2016, enterprise public cloud services spending will reach $207 billion.

That’s a substantial market, but a market with distinct segments, not all of which are easily adaptable to telco provisioning. So among the issues is the question of which of these markets are most congruent with what telcos already do.

Looking only at the segment names, it might seem as though infrastructure as a service is most congruent, and there is logic to that thought.

The largest segment, though, is “business process as a service.” Gartner says that BPaaS will grow from $84.1 billion in 2012 to $144.7 billion in 2016, generating a global compound annual growth rate of 15 percent.

BPaaS includes cloud-based enterprise processes such as cloud payments, cloud advertising  and “industry operations” such as e-commerce enablement.

In terms of revenue generated, cloud advertising is projected to grow from  $43.1 billion in 2011 to $95 billion in 2016, generating 17.1 percent CAGR in revenue growth through 2016.

Cloud payments are forecast to grow from $4.7 billion in 2011  to $10.6 billion in 2016, generating a CAGR of 17.8 percent worldwide.

E-commerce enablement using BPaaS-based platforms is expected to grow from $4.7 billion in 2011 to $9 billion in 2016, generating a 13.6 percent CAGR in revenue globally.

One might argue that payments, advertising and e-commerce are not necessarily areas where telcos have natural present advantages.

Software as a service will be a $26.5 billion market in 2016. SaaS-based applications include such functions as customer relationship management, enterprise resource planning, web conferencing, teaming platforms and social software suites, for example. SaaS-based CRM will grow from $3.9 billion in 2011 to $7.9 billiion in 2016.

Web conferencing, teaming platforms and social software suites will grow from $2 billion in 2011 to $3.4 billion in 2016. SaaS-based ERP will grow from $1.9 billion  in 2011 to $4.3 billion in 2016.
Supply chain management will grow from  $1.2 billion in 2011 growing to $3.3  billion in 2016.

Platform as a service might be just a $2.9 billion business in 2016. PaaS generally includes development environments, and also generally is the smallest of the opportunities. PaaS includes application development, database management systems, business intelligence platforms and application infrastructure and middleware.

Infrastructure as a service is forecast to grow to $24.4 billion in 2016. Gartner argues, and has the most obvious fit with competencies service providers already possess.

(IaaS) is a highly automated offering where compute resources, complemented by storage and networking capabilities, are offered to the customer on-demand, Gartner says.

With a projected CAGR of 41.7 percent, IaaS is the fastest growing of the public cloud segments. From $4.2 billion in revenue generated in 2011, IaaS is forecast to hit $24.4 billion in 2016. That includes computing services, storage and print server functions.

The computing subsegment is expected to see the greatest revenue growth globally, growing from $3.3 billion in 2011 to $20.2 billion in 2016.

The point is simply that the cloud computing opportunity is large, but also consists of segments that might be harder or easier for service providers to compete within. Very few of the cloud segments, even when using bandwidth, access and data centers, rely at the retail level on expertise in those areas.



4 comments:

Buy CRM Software said...

Very Good Information shared. . Sales crm is the best for sales company maintain our own record.Today some small scale and large scale company's willing to used this kind of software.
Regards Brian

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
office24by7 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
office24by7 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Many Winners and Losers from Generative AI

Perhaps there is no contradiction between low historical total factor annual productivity gains and high expected generative artificial inte...